Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Advanced Material > Packaging & Container > Stand-up Pouches - 2009 to 2012, Global Markets, Economics, and Technologies
Category
Advanced Material (3726)
Adhesives (56)
Carbon (42)
Catalyst (37)
Ceramics (119)
Fire-retardant (27)
Glass (66)
Ink /Printing (37)
Metal (229)
Nanotechnology (200)
Organic Compound (372)
Packaging & Container (484)
Plastic (408)
Polymers (176)
Rare Metal (121)
Market Research Report

Stand-up Pouches - 2009 to 2012, Global Markets, Economics, and Technologies

Published by Allied Development Corp.
Published July, 2009 Product code 92393
Content info 500+ Pages
Price
US $ 4500 Hard Copy (Single License)
US $ 4500 PDF by E-mail (Single License)
US $ 7200 Hard Copy (Corporate License)
US $ 7200 PDF by E-mail (Corporate License)


Stand-up Pouches - 2009 to 2012, Global Markets, Economics, and Technologies published by Allied Development Corp. in July, 2009. This report consists of 500+ Pages and the price starts from US $ 4500.

Introduction

Abstract

Stand-up Pouches - 2009 to 2012 is a global study of the stand-up pouch industry. This 500+ page report is the definitive study of this industry.

The market information in gStand-up Pouchesh provides an up-to-date assessment of the stand-up pouch market including market drivers, consumption volumes, market trends, and competitive products. It also provides a quantitative forecast through 2012.

The Economic and Environmental section provides quantitative analyses of both economic and environmental impact for competing packaging types. Specifically, a spouted stand-up pouch is compared to a PET bottle for liquid soap; a retort stand-up pouch is compared to a can for wet pet food.

The Technology section provides an assessment of stand-up pouch designs, materials, production methods, and emerging technology.

Table of Contents

Section I: Introduction

  • A. Stand-up pouch defined
  • B. The difference between a bag and a pouch
  • C. Geographic regions
  • D. Included in the study
  • E. Methodology and organization of this study
  • F. Conventions

Section II: Executive Summary

  • A. Market forces
    • 1. Differentiation
    • 2. Environmental impact
    • 3. Applications
    • 4. Infrastructure
    • 5. Equipment productivity
    • 6. Competitive response
    • 7. Cost
  • B. Projection
    • 1. End-use
    • 2. Geographic region
    • 3. Spouts
  • C. Conclusion

Section III: Pouch Construction

  • A. Stand-up pouch designs
    • 1. Doyen-style pouch
    • 2. Poucher pouch
    • 3. CornerZip pouch from Hosokawa
    • 4. ID pouch from Fujimori
    • 5. Double Doyen pouch
    • 6. Non-Doyen pouches with top and bottom gussets
    • 7. True flat-bottom pouches
    • 8. SIP pouch
    • 9. Pouch standing on fitment
  • B. Partially stable bags and pouches
    • 1. Side-gusseted pouch
    • 2. Four-corner-seal pouch
    • 3. Cheer Pack pouch
    • 4. Spread-R-Pak pouch
    • 5. SipTop pouch
    • 6. Smartcube k-bottom bag
    • 7. W-bottom or plow bottom pouch
  • C. Standard pouches and bag designs (not stable)
    • 1. Three-side-seal pouch
    • 2. Four-side-seal pouch
    • 3. Center-seal pouch
    • 4. Pillow pouch
    • 5. End-seal bag
    • 6. Side-seal bag
    • 7. Center-seal bag
    • 8. Pillow bag
    • 9. Implications for stand-up pouches
  • D. Rigid packaging concepts
    • 1. Retort Carton
    • 2. Paper cans
    • 3. Aluminum bottle
    • 4. TULC can and aTULC can
    • 5. Implications for stand-up pouches
  • E. Spouts
    • 1. Base design
    • 2. Spout position
    • 3. Spout cost
    • 4. No spill spouts
    • 5. Tamper-evident spouts
    • 6. Flexible spouts
    • 7. Concepts to eliminate spout inserting
    • 8. Specialty
    • 9. One-piece spouts
    • 10. Cut-off spouts
    • 11. Designer spouts
    • 12. Spout summary
  • F. Reclosable zippers
    • 1. Zipper styles
    • 2. Zipper construction
    • 3. Zipper developments
    • 4. Zipper summary
  • G. Vents
    • 1. Vented pouches with rigid vents
    • 2. Vented pouches with flexible vents
  • H. Shapes
  • I. New and emerging technologies
    • 1. Cartridge Pack System
    • 2. Pouches for carbonated products
  • J. Films and laminates
    • 1. Universal requirements
    • 2. Special techniques
    • 3. Pouch suppliers

Section IV: Equipment Technology

  • A. Fabricating pre-formed pouches
  • B. Pre-formed pouch equipment
    • 1. Dedicated pouch machines
    • 2. Pouch machine suppliers
  • C. Filling stand-up pouches
    • 1. Two-step process  making and filling pouches
    • 2. One-step process  horizontal
    • 3. One-step process  vertical
  • D. Filling technology developments
    • 1. Liquid fill/seal
    • 2. Form/fill/seal equipment
    • 3. Ultrasonic sealing equipment
    • 4. Other equipment
    • 5. Filler suppliers
    • 6. Inserting fitments
    • 7. Pouch handling
  • E. Other developments
    • 1. Food processing techniques
    • 2. New designs

Section V: Economics and Environmental

  • F. Case 1: Stand-up pouch manufacturing (Pet food)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • G. Case 2: Aluminum can manufacturing (Pet food)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • H. Case 3: Comparison of Case 1 and Case 2
    • 1. Material cost
    • 2. Labor cost
    • 3. Transportation cost
    • 4. Plant margin and prices
  • I. Case 4: Stand-up pouch filling (Pet food)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • J. Case 5: Aluminum can filling (Pet food)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • K. Case 6: Comparison of Case 4 and Case 5
    • 1. Material cost
    • 2. Labor cost
    • 3. Transportation cost
    • 4. Plant margin and prices
  • L. Case 7: Stand-up pouch LCA
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life
  • M. Case 8: Aluminum can LCA
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life
  • N. Case 9: Comparison of Case 7 and Case 8
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life
  • O. Case 10: Stand-up pouch manufacture (Refill)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • P. Case 11: Manufacture a PET bottle (Refill)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • Q. Case 12: Comparison of Case 10 and Case 11
    • 1. Material cost
    • 2. Labor cost
    • 3. Transportation cost
    • 4. Plant margin and prices
  • R. Case 13: Spouted stand-up pouch filling (Refill)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
    • S. Case 14: PET bottle filling (Refill)
    • 1. Assumptions
    • 2. Economic results
  • T. Case 15: Comparison of Case 13 and Case 14
    • 1. Material cost
    • 2. Labor cost
    • 3. Transportation cost
    • 4. Plant margin and prices
  • U. Case 16: Spouted pouch LCA
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life
  • V. Case 17: PET bottle LCA
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life
  • W. Case 18: Comparison of Case 16 and Case 17
    • 1. Energy
    • 2. Greenhouse gas releases
    • 3. End of life

Section VI: Market Analysis

  • A. Trends
    • 1. Consumers
    • 2. Retailers
    • 3. Consumer product companies
  • B. Market projection
  • C. Liquid food
    • 1. Fruit-flavored drinks
    • 2. Aseptically packaged liquid food
    • 3. Other
    • 4. Projection
  • D. Food
    • 1. Retorted food
    • 2. Frozen food
    • 3. Prepared drinks
    • 4. Dried fruit
    • 5. Confectionery
    • 6. Salty snacks
    • 7. Dry mixes
    • 8. Other
    • 9. Projection
  • E. Pet food
  • F. Non-food
    • 1. Detergent
    • 2. Agricultural and chemical
    • 3. Health and beauty
    • 4. Automotive lubricants
    • 5. Projection
  • G. Geographic
  • H. Retort
  • I. Pouch design
  • J. Reclosable zipper
  • K. Spouts
  • L. Pouch filling concept (pre-made versus form/fill/seal)
  • M. Summary of projection

Section VII: Equipment Supplier Profiles

Section VIII: Producer Profiles

Section IX: Glossary
Back to Top