Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Biotechnology > Personalized Medicine > Disruption or Advantage? Update on Companion Diagnostics
Category
Biotechnology (1536)
Antibody & Immunity (193)
Biomarker (169)
Biomaterials (56)
Biotechnology Equipment (359)
Gene Therapeutics & RNAi (115)
Genome-based Drug Discovery (204)
Molecular Targeted Therapeutics (51)
Personalized Medicine (57)
Regenerative Medicine (122)
Market Research Report

Disruption or Advantage? Update on Companion Diagnostics

Published by Decision Resources, Inc.
Published September, 2009 Product code 100335
Content info 25 Pages
Price
US $ 4600 PDF by E-mail (Global License)


Disruption or Advantage? Update on Companion Diagnostics published by Decision Resources, Inc. in September, 2009. This report consists of 25 Pages and the price starts from US $ 4600.

Introduction

Abstract

Introduction

Some naysayers disagree, but we regard companion diagnostics as a win-win scenario for all stakeholders. Companion diagnostics combines drug and diagnostic test development. The potential for effi cient drug development is huge because companion diagnostics can be used to predict drug response and treatment effi cacy - therefore, companion diagnostics are also the perfect means to fulfi llment of the promise of personalized medicine. But the advantages of companion diagnostics are only one side of the equation: they are also seen as disruptors of the pharmaceutical market that could restrict the size of treatable populations. Bringing the differing viewpoints together to form a unifi ed idea of what companion diagnostics really mean to the industry is a challenge, but one that companies must heed because companion diagnostics are making their mark - like it or not.

Questions Answered in This Report

  • Regulatory and payer decisions on certain types of testing are increasingly infl uencing physician, patient, and industry perspectives. For instance, how has the FDA' s recent decision to alter the Vectibix and Erbitux labels affected industry dynamics?
  • Companies that have developed companion diagnostics are viewed as valuable acquisition targets. Which companies are attracting potential buyers? What is the perceived impact of these acquisitions on the overall strategies of pharmaceutical companies?
  • The availability of companion diagnostics in oncology is greater than in other therapy areas. Why is oncology such an attractive area for growth in personalized medicine? In what other areas is development of personalized medicine growing?

Scope

  • Stakeholder analysis: Pharmaceutical companies, diagnostics companies, payers, regulatory agencies, physicians, and patients.
  • Recent trends and decisions: Regulating KRAS mutation tests, identifi cation of genetic markers of response to Vanda' s Fanapt (iloperidone), reimbursement for warfarin testing, partnering and dealmaking in companion diagnostics.
  • Indications: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), breast cancer, heart failure, arthritis, depression, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
  • Company profi les: Pharmaceutical companies - Wyeth, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Pfi zer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, ARCA BioPharma, Amgen, and Abbott. Diagnostics companies - LabCorp, DxS, Dako, and Clinical Data.
  • Outlook: Spectrum Expert Commentary on future growth, therapeutic area emphasis, the promise of personalized medicine.

Mentioned in This Spectrum Report

  • Companies
    • Abbott
    • Abbott Molecular
    • Amgen
    • ARCA BioPharma
    • Arup Laboratories
    • AstraZeneca
    • Asuragen
    • Bayer
    • Biogen Idec
    • BioGenex
    • Boehringer Ingelheim
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb
    • Celera
    • Chugai
    • Clinical Data
    • Dako
    • DiaSorin
    • DxS
    • Eli Lilly
    • Genentech
    • General Electric
    • Genomic Health
    • Genzyme Genetics
    • GlaxoSmithKline
    • ImClone
    • Johnson & Johnson
    • LabCorp
    • Merck & Co.
    • Monogram Biosciences
    • Novartis
    • OSI Pharmaceuticals
    • Pfi zer
    • Prometheus Laboratories
    • Roche
    • Source MDx
    • TcLand Expression
    • Third Wave Technologies (now Hologic)
    • Vanda Pharmaceuticals
    • Ventana Medical Systems
    • Vysis
    • Wyeth

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • Introduction
  • Continued Efforts to Engage Stakeholders
  • Companion Diagnostics by Therapeutic Area: Focus on Oncology
  • Drug-Diagnostics Dialogue - Work in Progress
    • Technological Advances
    • Complex Codevelopment Workfl ows
    • Reimbursement Rules! But Not Without Challenges
    • Is Guidance from Regulators Suffi cient?
  • Building Capacity - Key Companies
    • Pharmaceutical Companies
    • Diagnostics Companies
      • Clinical Data
      • Dako
      • DxS
      • LabCorp
  • Outlook
    • Ugly Myth, Annoying Truth, or Advantage?
    • Bottom Line

Expert Commentary

  • Companion Diagnostics - Looking to the Future
    • by Cheryl Barton, Ph.D., PharmaVision

Tables

  • 1. Select Companion Diagnostic Tests and Corresponding Targets
  • 2. Select KRAS Testing Companion Diagnostics
  • 3. Common Technologies Underlying Companion Diagnostic Tests
  • 4. Recent Companion Diagnostic-Drug Development Collaboration Activity
  • 5. Dako' s Companion Diagnostic Tests
  • A. Examples of Targeted Drugs and Associated Companion Diagnostics Launched in the Past Five Years

Figures

  • 1. The FDA Vision of Drug-Diagnostic Codevelopment
  • 2. Coverage of Select Targeted Cancer Therapies by Private Health Plans
  • 3. Coverage of Select Targeted Cancer Therapies by Medicare Plans
  • 4. Benefi t of the Personalized Medicine Model
Back to Top