Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Pharmaceutical > Drug Discovery > Rethinking Pharmaceutical R&D: Will New Strategies Yield a Pipeline Payoff?
Category
Pharmaceutical (4993)
Bone Disease Treatment (46)
Cancer (884)
Diabetes (159)
Drug Delivery System (184)
Drug Discovery (1403)
Generic Drugs (128)
Infectious Disease (407)
Mental Disease (98)
Neurodegenerative Disease (180)
Obesity Treatment (49)
OTC Drug (149)
Pharmaceutical Companies (562)
Prescription Drugs (120)
Regulation (122)
Vaccines (178)
Veterinary Medicine (28)
Market Research Report

Rethinking Pharmaceutical R&D: Will New Strategies Yield a Pipeline Payoff?

Published by Decision Resources, Inc.
Published September, 2009 Product code 100337
Content info 24 Pages
Price
US $ 4600 PDF by E-mail (Global License)


Rethinking Pharmaceutical R&D: Will New Strategies Yield a Pipeline Payoff? published by Decision Resources, Inc. in September, 2009. This report consists of 24 Pages and the price starts from US $ 4600.

Introduction

Abstract

Introduction

Can radical changes to the structures and strategies of pharmaceutical R&D operations - such as creating more entrepreneurial environments modeled upon biotech companies - increase their productivity? Many major companies are reorganizing the research branches of their businesses and fi nding creative ways to partner with biotech companies and with each other to access or acquire promising technologies and pipelines. Their goal is to reinvigorate R&D and combat the effects of patent expirations, generics competition, and other industry pressures.

Questions Answered in This Report

  • In recent years, drug developers have invested heavily in various R&D technologies. Is this investment increasing R&D productivity? What technology strategies are most promising? What new approaches are pharmaceutical companies using to access enabling technologies for drug discovery?
  • Pharmaceutical companies are seeking to reinvigorate R&D organizations to improve productivity. What steps are leading companies taking to change R&D? What structures and strategies have already been implemented within Big Pharma R&D organizations? Can pharmaceutical companies replicate the innovation of biotech companies by reforming R&D?
  • Biotech companies are an important source of novel technologies and drug candidates. How do acquisitions of and collaborations with biotech companies fi t into Big Pharma' s R&D strategies? How can companies use business development activities to build up technological capabilities and pipelines?
  • Several Big Pharma companies are charting new territory in early-stage pharma-pharma dealmaking. Which companies have recently formed innovative partnerships that include early-stage development? What are the key features of these arrangements? How do these ventures meet the strategic needs of both partners?

Scope

  • Technology strategies: Use of high-throughput technologies and R&D productivity, biologics platforms, pharma-pharma ventures for enabling technology development.
  • Organizational structures and strategies: Restructuring R&D, emulating biotech, case studies of R&D reorganization.
  • Building R&D through business development: M&As, collaborations, R&D strategies.
  • Pharma-pharma partnering: Strategic alliances among Big Pharma companies, Phase I codevelopment collaboration, therapeutic area joint venture.
  • Outsourcing R&D: China, India, potential advantages and disadvantages.
  • Outlook for pharmaceutical R&D: Changing business models, personalized medicine, pursuing novel targets, collaboration, high-throughput strategies, translational medicine.

Mentioned in This Report

  • Adnexus Therapeutics
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca
  • BiPar Sciences
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Cambridge Antibody Technology
  • Coley Pharmaceutical
  • CovX Research
  • Dyax
  • Eli Lilly
  • Endra
  • Enlight Biosciences
  • Exelixis
  • Genentech
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • GlycoFi
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • KAI Pharmaceuticals
  • Kosan Biosciences
  • Medarex
  • MedImmune
  • Merck
  • Nissan Chemical Industries
  • Novartis
  • Oxford BioMedica
  • PDL BioPharma
  • Pfi zer
  • PureTech Ventures
  • Regeneron
  • Renovis
  • Rinat Neurosciences
  • Roche
  • Sirtris
  • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Teijin Pharma
  • Wyeth
  • Zymogenetics

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • Introduction
  • Technology Strategies - Will They Pay Off?
    • The Industrialization of Drug Discovery
    • Biologics Platforms
    • Enlight Biosciences: Big Pharma' s Technology Collaboration
  • Organizational Structures and Strategies
    • GlaxoSmithKline
    • Novartis
    • Pfi zer
    • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Building R&D Through Business Development
  • Pharma-Pharma Partnering
    • AstraZeneca and Merck: Early-Stage Development for Cancer
    • GlaxoSmithKline and Pfi zer: A Joint Venture for HIV
  • Moving R&D to China and India
  • Outlook for Pharmaceutical R&D

Tables

  • 1. Top-Selling Biologic Drugs
  • 2. Bristol-Myers Squibb' s “String of Pearls” Deals
  • 3. GlaxoSmithKline/Pfi zer HIV Joint Venture Portfolio

Figures

  • 1. Combined R&D Expense vs. New Molecular Entity Approvals for 15 Top Pharmaceutical Companies, 2000-2008
  • 2. Business Model for Enlight Biosciences
  • 3. Simplifi ed Scheme of the Mechanisms of Action of MK-2206 and AZD-6244
Back to Top