Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Telecom & IT > Optical Network > Cost Analysis of RBOCs' Advanced Access Architectures: FTTP, FTTN, FTTC
Category
Telecom & IT (11491)
Broadband (400)
Contact Centers (153)
Contents (614)
Convergence (197)
Data Center (350)
Digital Broadcasting (310)
E-commerce (204)
IT Outsourcing (321)
IT Security (498)
LBS (151)
Mobile Device (724)
Mobile Subscribers (128)
Network (634)
Network & Access Devices (256)
Next Generation Wireless Com (538)
NFC (148)
Online Marketing (138)
Operator Company Profile (768)
Optical Network (266)
RFID (250)
Satellite Telecom (130)
Set-Top Box (61)
Software (1026)
UC (299)
Web-Service (489)
Wireless LAN/WiMAX (547)
Market Research Report

Cost Analysis of RBOCs' Advanced Access Architectures: FTTP, FTTN, FTTC

Published by IGI Consulting, Inc.
Published October, 2008 Product code 76320
Content info  
Price
US $ 1995 Hard Copy
US $ 2995 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 3995 PDF by E-mail (Site License)
US $ 5995 PDF by E-mail (Corporate License)


Cost Analysis of RBOCs' Advanced Access Architectures: FTTP, FTTN, FTTC published by IGI Consulting, Inc. in October, 2008. This report price starts from US $ 1995.

Introduction

Abstract

Overview

Approaches to AAAs

There are three predominant Advanced Access Architectures in use by the telcos, and those used by the cable companies are generally similar, only having coax on the last leg. These are the AT&T approach of fiber-to-the-node (FTTN); the Verizon approach of fiber-to-the-premise (FTTP or FTTH): and the BellSouth (now AT&T) approach of fiber-to-the-curb.

This Report

This report will present a model for evaluating the various approaches to AAAs, primarily by analyzing the fiber required for each. This model will also provide a methodology for evaluating moving from one architecture to another (e.g., converting from FTTN to FTTP). This section will also present this author' s forecast for what AT&T will do in the former BellSouth areas. The report will also investigate macro methods to investigate the costs of the various approaches. We will conclude with our forecasts for the total costs involved in the AAA efforts of the RBOCs.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Figures

The Lightwave Network Series of Reports

The Lightwave Network

The Lightwave Series of Reports

  • General Reports on the Network
  • General Market Reports
  • Specific Systems Reports

Introduction

Approaches to AAAs

Costs of AAAs

This Report

Fiber Requirements for Various Advanced Access Architectures

  • BellSouth' s Fiber to the Curb (FTTC)
  • AT&T' s Fiber to the node (FTTN)
  • Verizon' s FTTP (Fiber to the Premise)

Summary of Fiber Requirements

Analysis of Architectural Differences - A Model

Fiber Required for Each Architecture

Cost of Fiber Needed for Each Architecture

AT&T' s New Plans for BellSouth - a Hybrid FTTC/FTTN

Macro-Cost approach to AAA Costs

  • AT&T - Uverse
  • FiOS
  • Qwest

Summary of Costs

Vendors Listing

Summary of Vendors

Detailed Listing of Vendors

  • Acterna (acquired by JDSU)
  • ADC
  • Adtran
  • Advanced Fibre Communications Inc. (AFCI) (Now Tellabs)
  • Alcatel-Lucent
  • Alloptic Inc
  • Amino Technologies plc
  • AOC Technologies
  • Avanex Corporation
  • Broadlight
  • Calix
  • Cisco
  • Conexant
  • Corrigent
  • Entrisphere Inc. (Acquired by Ericsson)
  • Ericsson
  • Fiberxon (Now Source Photonics combined with Luminent)
  • Finisar Corporation
  • FlexLight Networks (Defunct)
  • Fujitsu
  • Genone3 Technologies Inc.
  • Hitachi Communication Technologies Ltd.
  • Humax USA Inc.
  • Iamba Networks
  • JDS Uniphase
  • Kreatel Communications AB (Acquired by Motorola)
  • LG Electronics
  • LightComm Technology
  • Marconi
  • Microsoft
  • Motorola
  • NeoPhotonics
  • Nortel
  • Novera Optics (owned by Nortel / LG JV)
  • OFS
  • O-Net Communications Ltd
  • Oplink Communications, Inc.
  • Optiviva Inc.
  • Optical Solutions (Acquired by Calix)
  • Osaki Electric Co. Ltd.
  • Paceon (Mitsubishi)
  • Passave (Acquired by PMC-Sierra)
  • PMC-Sierra
  • Quantum Bridge Communications (Acquired by Motorola)
  • Salira Optical Network Systems
  • Scientific-Atlanta (Cisco)
  • Siemens
  • Source Photonics (Combined with Fiberxon and Luminent)
  • Tandberg Ltd. (Ericsson)
  • Tellabs
  • Terawave (Acquired by Occam Networks)
  • Tut Systems (Acquired by Motorola)
  • Vinci Systems, Inc. (Acquired by Tellabs)
  • Wave7 Optics
  • Worldwide Packets, Inc. (Acquired by Ciena)
  • Zhone Technologies

Appendix I - Access Architecture

Various Approaches for Fiber-based Access Architecture

Fiber to the “X”

xDSL Versions

Design Details for Current Plans

  • Fiber to the Neighborhood (FTTN)
  • AT&T' s Fiber to the node (FTTN)
  • BellSouth' s Fiber to the Curb (FTTC)

The RFP - PONs Will Set Us Free

  • What Are PONs?
    • The PON Design
  • Status of PON
  • Advantage and Disadvantages of PON
  • Types of PONs
    • BPON
    • EPON
    • GPON
  • The PON in the First RFP
  • GPONs

Architectures to Meet the Needs

Table of Figures

  • Figure 1. Lightwave Network
  • Figure 2. Predominant Advanced Access Architectures
  • Figure 3. BellSouth FTTC
  • Figure 4. AT&T Uverse (FTTN)
  • Figure 5. Verizon FiOS (FTTP)
  • Figure 6. Fibers Required per Year for Each Architecture
  • Figure 7. Amount of Fibers for the Architectures
  • Figure 8. Length of Fiber for the Architectures
  • Figure 9. Fiber Costs of the Three Architectures
  • Figure 10. Fiber Cost per customer - Each Architecture
  • Figure 11. AT&T - BellSouth Hybrid FTTC
  • Figure 12. Fiber Required Upgrading to Hybrid FTTC
  • Figure 13. Annual Costs of AAA
  • Figure 14. Summary of Vendors
  • Figure 15. Fiber to the ‘X' Varieties
  • Figure 16. Chart of Various xDSL Technologies
  • Figure 17. Fiber to the Neighborhood
  • Figure 18. Fiber to the node
  • Figure 19. Fiber to the Curb
  • Figure 20. PON Basic Arrangement
  • Figure 21. RFP PON - Central Office Portion
  • Figure 22. RFP PON - Outside Plant Portion
  • Figure 23. RFP PON Service Assignments
  • Figure 24. BPON/GPON Comparison
  • Figure 25. Typical GPON
  • Figure 26. Bandwidth Needs vs. Capabilities
Back to Top