Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Medical Device > Orthopedic > U.S. MARKETS FOR SPINAL DISC REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Category
Medical Device (4399)
Cardiovascular Device (252)
Catheter Equipment (209)
CT and MRI and X ray (146)
Dental Equipment (177)
Disposable Medical Device (83)
Endoscopy Equipment (114)
Healthcare IT (310)
In Vitro Diagnostics Equipment (436)
Medical Imaging (425)
Molecular Imaging/Agents (29)
Nuclear Medical (76)
Ophthalmic Equipment (105)
Orthopedic (343)
Patient Monitoring (384)
Ultra Sound (50)
Wound Care (120)
Market Research Report

U.S. MARKETS FOR SPINAL DISC REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT TECHNOLOGIES

Published by Life Science Intelligence, Inc.
Published May, 2008 Product code 74173
Content info 103 Pages / 40 Exhibits
Price
US $ 3900 Hard Copy (Single Site User License) Read Only
US $ 3900 PDF by E-mail (Single Site User License) Read Only
US $ 4650 Hard Copy & PDF by E-mail (Single Site User License) Read Only
US $ 7020 Hard Copy (Corporate License) Read Only
US $ 7020 PDF by E-mail (Corporate License) Read Only
US $ 7770 Hard Copy & PDF by E-mail (Corporate License) Read Only


U.S. MARKETS FOR SPINAL DISC REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT TECHNOLOGIES published by Life Science Intelligence, Inc. in May, 2008. This report consists of 103 Pages / 40 Exhibits and the price starts from US $ 3900.

Introduction

Abstract

U.S. MARKETS FOR SPINAL DISC REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT TECHNOLOGIES

To date, the growth of the U.S. market for artificial disc replacements has been disappointing. Initially, these technologies were expected to rapidly penetrate the market for spinal fusion patients due to their potential to: preserve motion, limit further degeneration, and avoid the need for fusion. Since the approval of DePuy Spines' Charite for lumbar disc replacement in October 2004 however, growth has been restrained by reimbursement challenges, limited long-term data, and the need to use an anterior approach for lumbar disc replacement.

Despite these challenges, manufacturers continue to pursue the enormous opportunity in artificial discs, and by 2013, a number of products should be approved which will feature different designs and allow alternative approaches to the lumbar spine. According to this new report by Life Science Intelligence (LSI), growth in lumbar disc replacements will increase due to positive developments in reimbursement, favorable clinical results, and the use of alternatives to the anterior approach.

In the market for cervical disc replacements, where growth has also been limited by reimbursement challenges and clinical concerns, the introduction of devices with different designs, the use of a familiar approach, and the increasing performance of multiple-level replacements during a single procedure will drive greater adoption.

As analyzed in this report, emerging markets such as annulus repair and nucleus repair/replacement could begin to limit the growth of artificial discs towards the end of the forecast period. Annulus repair, which can be used as a simple adjunct to discectomy, will see rapid adoption through 2013, particularly among newer surgeons. The market for nucleus replacement products, which should see some steady growth after 2010, is expected to grow substantially after the introduction of biological repair products, which could occur as early as 2012. By reducing the need for total disc replacement, these technologies will contribute to slower growth in the market for artificial discs after 2013.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Total Disc Replacement
    • 1.1.1 Total Disc Replacement in the Cervical Spine
      • 1.1.1.1 Factors Driving Adoption
      • 1.1.1.1.1 Positive Clinical Results
      • 1.1.1.1.2 Potential to Reduce Degeneration
      • 1.1.1.1.3 Familiar Approach
      • 1.1.1.1.4 Multi-Level Disc Replacement
      • 1.1.1.2 Barriers to Adoption
      • 1.1.1.2.1 Reimbursement Challenges
      • 1.1.1.2.2 Clinical Challenges
      • 1.1.1.2.3 Device Longevity and Wear Debris
    • 1.1.2 Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine
  • 1.2 Repair and Replacement Products for the Annulus and Nucleus
    • 1.2.1 Annular Repair
    • 1.2.2 Nuclear Repair/Replacement

2. Total Disc Replacement in the Cervical Spine

  • 2.1 The Procedure
  • 2.2 Clinical Goals and Results to Date
    • 2.2.1 Motion Preservation
    • 2.2.2 Adjacent Level Disease
    • 2.2.3 Multi-Level Disc Replacement
    • 2.2.4 Device Longevity
  • 2.3 Device Approvals
  • 2.4 Reimbursement
    • 2.4.1 Physician Coding and Payment
  • 2.5 Cervical Disc Replacement Companies and Products
    • 2.5.1 Advanced Prosthetic Technologies
    • 2.5.2 Amedica
    • 2.5.3 Biomet
    • 2.5.4 Cervitech
    • 2.5.5 DePuy Spine
    • 2.5.6 Globus Medical
    • 2.5.7 LDR Spine
    • 2.5.8 Medtronic Sofamor Danek
    • 2.5.9 Orthofix/Blackstone Medical
    • 2.5.10 Scient' x USA
    • 2.5.11 SeaSpine
    • 2.5.12 Spinal Kinetics
    • 2.5.13 Spinal Motion
    • 2.5.14 Stryker Spine
    • 2.5.15 Synthes
    • 2.5.16 Vertebron
  • 2.6 Procedure Forecast and Market Analysis
  • Exhibit 2-1: Selected Studies and Conclusions of Cervical Disc Replacement
  • Exhibit 2-2: Conditions and Explanations to FDA Approval for the Bryan Cervical Disc
  • Exhibit 2-3: ICD-9 Codes for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Exhibit 2-4: Diagnosis-Related Groups for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (MDC, Relative Weight, Medicare Payment)
  • Exhibit 2-5: Selected Suppliers and Status of Cervical Disc Replacement Products, 2008
  • Exhibit 2-6: Cervical Disc Replacements, U.S. Procedure Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 2-7: U.S. Cervical Disc Replacements by Level, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 2-8: Cervical Disc Replacement, U.S. Market Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 2-9: Cervical Disc Replacement Units, U.S. Market Forecast by Product Type, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 2-10: Cervical Disc Replacement Sales, U.S. Market Forecast by Product Type, 2007-2013E

3. Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine

  • 3.1 Clinical Goals
    • 3.1.1 Preserving Motion
    • 3.1.2 Reducing the Rate of Degeneration in Adjacent Segments
  • 3.2 The Procedure
  • 3.3 Clinical Results
  • 3.4 Reimbursement
  • 3.5 Companies and Products
    • 3.5.1 Aesculap
    • 3.5.2 AxioMed Spine
    • 3.5.3 Biomet
    • 3.5.4 DePuy Spine
    • 3.5.5 Disc Motion Technologies
    • 3.5.6 Eden Spine/FlexisMed
    • 3.5.7 ErgoSpine
    • 3.5.8 LDR Spine
    • 3.5.9 Medtronic Sofamor Danek
    • 3.5.10 Nexgen Spine
    • 3.5.11 NuVasive
    • 3.5.12 Ranier Technology
    • 3.5.13 Spinal Motion
    • 3.5.14 Stryker Spine
    • 3.5.15 Synthes
    • 3.5.16 Theken Disc
    • 3.5.17 US Spine
  • 3.6 Procedure Forecast
  • 3.7 Market Analysis
  • Exhibit 3-1: Results of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Products in Clinical Trials
  • Exhibit 3-2: U.S. Suppliers of Total Disc Replacements for the Lumbar Spine, 2008
  • Exhibit 3-3: Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine, U.S. Procedure Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 3-4: Lumbar Disc Replacements by Approach, U.S. Procedure Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 3-5: Lumbar Disc Replacements by Level, U.S. Procedure Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 3-6: Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine, U.S. Market Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 3-7: U.S Market for Lumbar Total Disc Replacement, Limiters & Drivers
  • Exhibit 3-8: Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine, U.S. Market Forecast by Product Design, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 3-9: Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine, U.S. Market Forecast by Approach, 2007-2013E

4. Products for the Annulus and Nucleus

  • 4.1 Annular Repair
    • 4.1.1 Clinical Results
    • 4.1.2 Annular Repair Techniques
    • 4.1.3 Reimbursement
    • 4.1.4 Companies and Products
      • 4.1.4.1 Anulex Technologies
      • 4.1.4.2 Intrinsic Therapeutics
      • 4.1.4.3 Orthopeutics
    • 4.1.5 Procedure Forecast
    • 4.1.6 Market Analysis
  • 4.2 Nucleus Repair and Replacement
    • 4.2.1 Types of Nucleus Repair/Replacement
    • 4.2.2 Clinical Results
    • 4.2.3 Reimbursement
    • 4.2.4 Companies and Products
    • 4.2.5 Procedure Forecast
    • 4.2.6 Market Analysis
  • Exhibit 4-1: Selected Studies and Conclusions of Re-Herniation Following Discectomy
  • Exhibit 4-2: Benefits, Disadvantages and Rationale of Annular Repair
  • Exhibit 4-3: Reimbursement Codes for Annular Repair (Inpatient Hospital Codes, Physician Services, Alternative Codes), 2007
  • Exhibit 4-4: Selected Suppliers of Annulus Repair Products, 2008
  • Exhibit 4-5: Anulex Technologies' Xclose Tissue Repair System
  • Exhibit 4-6: U.S. Procedure Volumes for Annular Repair, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-7: Factors Driving the Adoption of Annular Repair Products in the U.S.
  • Exhibit 4-8: Annular Repair Products, U.S. Market Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-9: U.S. Annular Repair Market Forecast by Product Type, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-10: Approaches to Repairing or Replacing the Nucleus
  • Exhibit 4-11: Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Repair/Replacement
  • Exhibit 4-12: Selected Suppliers of Nuclear Repair/Replacement Products, 2008
  • Exhibit 4-13: U.S. Procedure Volumes for Nuclear Repair/Replacement, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-14: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Nuclear Repair/Replacement
  • Exhibit 4-15: U.S. Procedure Forecast by Type for Nuclear Repair or Replacement, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-16: Nuclear Repair/Replacement Products, U.S. Market Forecast, 2007-2013E
  • Exhibit 4-17: U.S. Nuclear Repair/Replacement Market Forecast by Product Type, 2007-2013E

Select Companies Covered

  • 1. Abbott Spine
  • 2. Advanced Prosthetic Technologies
  • 3. Aesculap
  • 4. Amedica
  • 5. Anulex Technologies
  • 6. Arthro Kinetics
  • 7. AxioMed Spine
  • 8. Biomet
  • 9. Cervitech
  • 10. co.don
  • 11. CryoLife
  • 12. DePuy Spine
  • 13. Disc Dynamics
  • 14. Disc Motion Technologies
  • 15. Eden Spine/FlexisMed
  • 16. ErgoSpine
  • 17. Gentis
  • 18. Globus Medical
  • 19. Intrinsic Therapeutics
  • 20. ISTO Technologies
  • 21. LDR Spine
  • 22. Medtronic Sofamor Danek
  • 23. Nexgen Spine
  • 24. NuVasive
  • 25. Orthofix/Blackstone Medical
  • 26. Orthopeutics
  • 27. Pioneer Surgical
  • 28. Ranier Technology
  • 29. Raymedica
  • 30. Replication Medical
  • 31. Scient' x USA
  • 32. SeaSpine
  • 33. Spinal Kinetics
  • 34. Spinal Motion
  • 35. SpineMedica
  • 36. SpineSmith
  • 37. Spine Wave
  • 38. Stryker Spine
  • 39. Synthes
  • 40. Theken Disc
  • 41. TranS1
  • 42. US Spine
  • 43. Vertebral Technologies
  • 44. Vertebron
  • 45. Zimmer Spine

EMT Database Companies. Report purchase includes full electronic access to recent In3 investor/partnering conference presentations and company submitted executive summaries for select companies listed below:

  • 1. AxioMed Spine
  • 2. CryoLife
  • 3. Disc Dynamics
  • 4. Disc Motion Technologies
  • 5. Eden Spine/FlexisMed
  • 6. ErgoSpine
  • 7. Gentis
  • 8. ISTO Technologies
  • 9. LDR Spine
  • 10. Nexgen Spine
  • 11. Orthopeutics
  • 12. Ranier Technology
  • 13. Raymedica
  • 14. Scient' x USA
  • 15. SeaSpine
  • 16. Theken Disc
  • 17. TranS1
  • 18. US Spine
Back to Top