Merchant Security, Tokenization and the Fairy Tale of Outsourcing PCI published by Mercator Advisory Group, Inc. in March, 2009. This report consists of 28 pages, 6 exhibits & 4 tables. and the price starts from US $ 2950.
Abstract
Boston, MA. - March 18, 2009 - Given the high cost of compliance and
the operational risk of non-compliance, merchants are between the proverbial
rock and hard place. Merchants are looking at how to mitigate both the cost of
compliance and their risk profile. With Data breaches, fraud and the scope of
PCI Compliance expanding, tokenization of card numbers has emerged as a
trade-off rich approach for merchants.
A new report from Mercator Advisory Group' s Emerging Technologies Practice,
Merchant Security, Tokenization and the Fairy Tale of Outsourcing PCI looks at
merchant strategies to meet and lower their PCI compliance burden and examines
tokenization in great detail.
Based on the findings of this research report, it' s Mercator Advisory Group' s
position that merchants can improve their risk profile and lower PCI
compliance costs through third party storage of card data. That said, choosing
the tokenization vendor to provide that service requires careful selection and
evaluation of the trade-offs involved.
"Going down the tokenization path requires an eyes-wide-open process to
balance PCI compliance cost avoidance against business continuity risk,"
comments George Peabody, Director of Mercator Advisory Group' s Emerging
Technologies Advisory Service and author of the report. "Not only are there
risks with reliance on third party operations, the decision should be made
considering the enterprise' s information security strategy and with the
expectation that end-to-end encryption of card data may well become a PCI
requirement in the future."
For merchants anxious to change their PCI compliance profile, Peabody states
that the growing number of tokenization vendors and the range of delivery
models that include card processing give merchants plenty of choices.
Tokenization does require, however, varying levels of integration by the
merchant running from the simple to months of recoding line of business
applications.
Report Highlights Include:
- As hackers continue to breach the payment network, the average cost per
data breach now exceeds $6.65 million.
- As new attack vectors are identified, the cost of PCI compliance rises in
parallel, into the millions per year for large merchants.
- Tokenization and the outsourcing of card number storage is a leading
technique to limit the scope of a merchant' s PCI audit and to outsource
liability in the event of a data breach, an appealing combination to cost
conscious merchants.
- Tokenization is available through multiple delivery models and a growing
variety of vendors, from licensed software to outsourced providers including
card processors.
- End-to-end encryption may well be the end game recommendation of PCI and,
if data breaches continue to plague the payments industry and occupy
headlines, that recommendation may become a mandate within two years.
Companies Mentioned in This Report:
Shift4, Braintree Payment Solutions, Merchant Link, Electronic Payment
Exchange (EXP), Paymetric, nuBridges, Elavon, Southern Data Comm, Heartland
Payment Systems, RBS Worldpay, VeriFone, Semtek, Magtek, Magensa, Hypercom,
Ingenico, Hannaford, TJX, Verizon, Oracle and Microsoft
This report contains 28 pages, 6 exhibits and 4 tables.
Table of Contents
Introduction
- Outsourcing PCI is a Fairy Tale
- End to End Encryption is Another Path
- Not Just for Card Numbers
The Cost of Data Breaches
- Reminder where the Problems Lie
The PCI Challenge
- Keeping Up with PCI Requirements
- Managementfs View on Security
- Deciding What's Worse: PCI Enforcement or a Data Breach
- The Never-ending Game of "Security Whack-a-Mole"
Tokenization
- How Does Tokenization Work?
- Encrypting the Pre Authorization
- Tokenization in e-Commerce
- Number Formats
Deploying Tokenization
- Not Necessarily a Simple Switch
The Upsides of Tokenization
- PCI Scope Reduction
- Shifting the Liability and Risk
- Saving the Merchant Money at the POS
- Tokenization when Sharing Keys is Impossible
Tokenization Considerations
Changing Course is Hard to Do
- It's MY Data
- Not Another Third Party
- It's a New Approach
- The Fat New Target or Centralizing the Risk
- So Many Token Types to Choose From
- More than Token Account Control?
- The Buffer in the Gateway
Costs and Savings
Vendor Considerations
Conclusions
- What problem are we solving? PCI Compliance or data security?
- Someone Else's Problem
- Sustainability
- What Else Is There to Protect?
- The New Target?
- Where Are We Headed?
Table of Figures
- Figure 1: Hacker Attacks are Just 18% of Record Loss
- Figure 2: Third Party Control Carries Risks
- Figure 3: Tokenization at the POS
- Figure 4: A Tokenization Scheme that circumvents the POS terminal
- Figure 1: Hacker Attacks are Just 18% of Record Loss
- Figure 2: Third Party Control Carries Risks
- Figure 3: Tokenization at the POS
- Figure 4: A Tokenization Scheme that circumvents the POS terminal
- Figure 5: e-Commerce Tokenization is Straightforward