Market Research Report

US Markets for Urological Devices 2012

cover Published by Millennium Research Group
Published Product code 239831
Price

Introduction

Abstract

The US urological device market will experience moderate growth over the forecast period, largely fueled by the aging population in the US, which will promote a greater need for the devices covered in this report. The market for urinary incontinence (UI) devices generated the largest revenues in 2011 and is characterized by its large amount of competitors (many of which are multinational firms) and the presence of competing alternatives. Reimbursement changes that took effect in 2008 will continue to fuel unit growth in the intermittent catheter segment of the UI device market. The adoption of new devices that are less invasive and/or offer superior efficacy will promote growth in all device segments over the forecast period. Physicians and patients prefer minimally invasive procedures because of the fast recovery times, shorter hospital stays, and reduced pain associated with these procedures. Despite competition from pharmaceuticals that treat conditions such as UI, kidney stones, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and erectile dysfunction, the US urological device market will experience moderate growth through 2016.

METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted. These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.

Secondary sources include

  • Government sources:
    • Securities and Exchange Commission filings
    • Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
    • National Center for Health Statistics data
  • Urological device companies:
    • Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
  • Internal databases and reports:
    • Previous reports on similar/related sources
  • General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine searches:
    • Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might provide leads for primary research

The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.

The primary research methodology has four steps:

Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the report.

Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the implications of the information for the various urological device market segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as market shares).

Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research phase, industry and medical experts are identified.

These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important questions are asked of all experts.

The questions are largely based on the assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented, discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market numbers.

Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points finalized.

MARKETRACK METHODOLOGY

Millennium Research Group's Marketrack methodology involves recruiting hospital personnel responsible for the management of urological devices and procedures to participate by providing procedure volumes, device usage data, and brand-level pricing information on an ongoing basis. Hospital respondents include facility managers, nurses, administrators, and physicians.

FORECAST METHODOLOGY

In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following “bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions for the report.

A comprehensive breakdown of various urological device procedures and unit sales is prepared using data from several sources, including professional associations, government statistics, and private research/media sources. Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through annual reports and other sources are compared against modeled industry revenues.

Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.

Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.

Companies mentioned in this report:

  • AbbeyMoor Medical
  • AllMed Systems
  • AMS (acquired by Endo Pharmaceuticals)
  • Amsino
  • Applied Medical
  • Astra Tech
  • Best Medical
  • Biocompatibles
  • BioDerm
  • Boston Scientific
  • Caldera Medical
  • Cardinal Health
  • CL Medical
  • Coloplast
  • Convergent Laser Technologies
  • Cook Urological
  • Core Oncology
  • Covidien
  • C. R. Bard
  • DirexGroup
  • Dornier MedTech
  • DraxImage
  • Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG
  • EDAP TMS
  • ETHICON
  • FMD
  • Fossa Medical
  • Galil Medical
  • HealthTronics
  • Hollister
  • IsoAid
  • IsoRay
  • KARL STORZ
  • Kitalpha Med
  • Laser Peripherals
  • LISA laser products
  • Lumenis
  • Medispec
  • Medline Industries
  • Medtronic
  • Mpathy Medical
  • Neomedic International
  • New Star Lasers
  • NORTECH
  • Nucletron
  • Olympus/Gyrus-ACMI
  • Oncura
  • PENTAX Medical
  • PercSys
  • Promedon
  • ProSurg
  • Quanta Systems
  • Richard Wolf
  • Rochester Medical
  • RUSCH (a Teleflex Medical company)
  • Siemens Healthcare
  • Theragenics
  • Trimedyne
  • UROCARE Products
  • Urologix
  • Uroplasty

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

  • 1.1. Background
    • 1.1.1. Urinary Incontinence
    • 1.1.2. Urinary Stones
    • 1.1.3. Prostate Cancer
    • 1.1.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    • 1.1.5. Erectile Dysfunction
  • 1.2. Diagnosis and Referral Patterns
    • 1.2.1. Urinary Incontinence
    • 1.2.2. Urinary Stones
    • 1.2.3. Prostate Cancer
    • 1.2.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    • 1.2.5. Erectile Dysfunction
  • 1.3. Procedure Overview
    • 1.3.1. Urological Device Procedures
      • 1.3.1.1. Urinary Incontinence Treatments
      • 1.3.1.2. Stone Management Procedures
      • 1.3.1.3. Prostate Cancer Treatments
      • 1.3.1.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments
      • 1.3.1.5. Erectile Dysfunction Treatments
    • 1.3.2. Competing Treatments
      • 1.3.2.1. Urinary Incontinence
      • 1.3.2.2. Urinary Stones
      • 1.3.2.3. Prostate Cancer
      • 1.3.2.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
      • 1.3.2.5. Erectile Dysfunction
  • 1.4. Clinical Guidelines
  • 1.5. Country Overview
    • 1.5.1. Demographics and Economy
    • 1.5.2. Health Care System
    • 1.5.3. Regulatory Environment

2.0 PRODUCTS

  • 2.1. Overview
    • 2.1.1. Products Covered
  • 2.2. Urinary Incontinence Devices
    • 2.2.1. Functions
      • 2.2.1.1. Urinary Catheters
        • Intermittent Catheters
        • Male External Catheters
        • Foley Catheters
      • 2.2.1.2. Urine Drainage Bags
      • 2.2.1.3. Vaginal Slings
        • By Material Group
        • Commercial Vaginal Slings
        • Autologous Vaginal Slings
        • By Technique
        • Midurethral Vaginal Slings
        • Bladder-Neck (Traditional) Vaginal Slings
      • 2.2.1.4. Artificial Urinary Sphincter
      • 2.2.1.5. Male Slings
      • 2.2.1.6. Urethral Bulking Agents
    • 2.2.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.2.3. Emerging Products
      • 2.2.3.1. Electrical Stimulation and Magnetic Innervation Devices
  • 2.3. Stone Management Devices
    • 2.3.1. Functions
      • 2.3.1.1. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Devices
      • 2.3.1.2. Ureteral Stents
      • 2.3.1.3. Retrieval Devices
      • 2.3.1.4. Holmium Lasers
        • Holmium Laser Systems
        • Holmium Laser Fibers
      • 2.3.1.5. Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
        • Combination Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
        • Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
        • Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
        • Electrohydraulic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
    • 2.3.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.3.3. Emerging Products
  • 2.4. Prostate Cancer Treatment Devices
    • 2.4.1. Functions
      • 2.4.1.1. Brachytherapy Seeds
      • 2.4.1.2. Cryoablation Devices
      • 2.4.1.3. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Devices
    • 2.4.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.4.3. Labeled Indications
  • 2.5. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Devices
    • 2.5.1. Functions
      • 2.5.1.1. Holmium Lasers
      • 2.5.1.2. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Devices
      • 2.5.1.3. Prostatic Stents
      • 2.5.1.4. Radiofrequency Devices
      • 2.5.1.5. Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate Devices
      • 2.5.1.6. Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy Devices
      • 2.5.1.7. Thulium Lasers
    • 2.5.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.5.3. Emerging Products
  • 2.6. Urological Endoscopes
    • 2.6.1. Functions
    • 2.6.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.6.3. Emerging Products
  • 2.7. Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Devices
    • 2.7.1. Functions
      • 2.7.1.1. Inflatable Penile Implants
      • 2.7.1.2. Malleable Penile Implants
    • 2.7.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.7.3. Labeled Indications

3.0 CLINICAL TRIALS

  • 3.1. Completed Clinical Trials
  • 3.2. Ongoing Clinical Trials

4.0. BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

  • 4.1. Overview
    • 4.1.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.1.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.1.3. Market Shares
  • 4.2. Urinary Incontinence Device Market
    • 4.2.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.2.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.2.3. Current Market Shares
  • 4.3. Stone Management Device Market
    • 4.3.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.3.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.3.3. Current Market Shares
  • 4.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Device Market
    • 4.4.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.4.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.4.3. Current Market Shares
  • 4.5. Urological Endoscope Market
    • 4.5.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.5.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.5.3. Current Market Shares
  • 4.6. Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market
    • 4.6.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.6.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.6.3. Current Market Shares
  • 4.7. Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Device Market
    • 4.7.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 4.7.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
    • 4.7.3. Current Market Shares

5.0 MARKET OUTLOOK

  • 5.1. Overview
    • 5.1.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.1.2. Detailed Market Overview
  • 5.2. Urinary Incontinence Device Market
    • 5.2.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.2.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.2.2.1. Urinary Catheter Market
        • Intermittent Catheter Market
        • Foley Catheter Market
        • Male External Catheter Market
      • 5.2.2.2. Vaginal Sling Market
      • 5.2.2.3. Urine Drainage Bag Market
      • 5.2.2.4. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market
      • 5.2.2.5. Male Sling Market
      • 5.2.2.6. Urethral Bulking Agent Market
  • 5.3. Stone Management Device Market
    • 5.3.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.3.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.3.2.1. Ureteral Stent Market
      • 5.3.2.2. Holmium Laser Market
      • 5.3.2.3. Retrieval Device Market
      • 5.3.2.4. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Device Market
      • 5.3.2.5. Other Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market
        • Combination Lithotripsy Device Market
        • Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market
        • Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Device Market
        • Pneumatic Lithotripsy Device Market
  • 5.4. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Device Market
    • 5.4.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.4.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.4.2.1. Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate Device Market
      • 5.4.2.2. Holmium Laser Market
      • 5.4.2.3. Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy Device Market
      • 5.4.2.4. Prostatic Stent Market
      • 5.4.2.5. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Device Market
      • 5.4.2.6. Thulium Laser Market
      • 5.4.2.7. Radiofrequency Ablation Device Market
  • 5.5. Urological Endoscope Market
    • 5.5.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.5.2. Detailed Market Overview
  • 5.6. Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market
    • 5.6.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.6.2. Detailed Market Overview
    • 5.6.3. Brachytherapy Seed Market
    • 5.6.4. Cryoablation Device Market
    • 5.6.5. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device Market (Qualitative Discussion Only)
  • 5.7. Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Device Market
    • 5.7.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.7.2. Detailed Market Overview

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Figure 1: Urological Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 1: Urological Device Market Landscape, US (US$), 2011 and 2016
  • Table 2: Urological Device Market Leaders, by Product Type and Revenue, US, 2011
  • Table 3: Expected Key Events in the Urological Device Market, US, 2012 - 2016
  • Table 4: Factors Impacting the Urological Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 5: Companies Mentioned in This Report
  • Table 6: Key Report Updates, 2012

1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

  • Table 7: Types of UI
  • Table 8: Selected Urinary Stones, by Cause and Composition
  • Table 9: UI Treatment Providers and Referral Patterns, by Treatment Phase
  • Table 10: Urinary Stone Treatment Providers and Referral Patterns, by Treatment Phase
  • Table 11: BPH Treatment Providers and Referral Patterns, by Treatment Phase
  • Table 12: ED Treatment Providers and Referral Patterns, by Treatment Phase
  • Table 13: Selected Indications for Urinary Catheterization
  • Table 14: Stone Management Treatment Options
  • Table 15: Selected Prostate Cancer Treatment Options
  • Table 16: Competing UI Treatments
  • Table 17: Competing Urinary Stone Treatments
  • Table 18: Competing Prostate Cancer Treatments
  • Table 19: Competing BPH Treatments
  • Table 20: Competing ED Treatments, Europe
  • Table 21: Urological Condition Treatment Guidelines, by Indication
  • Table 22: Key Health and Economic Indicators, US

2.0 PRODUCTS

  • Table 23: Urological Device Market, by Product Type and Subtype, US
  • Table 24: UI Device Functions, by Product Subtype
  • Table 25: Types of Urinary Catheters
  • Table 26: Advantages and Disadvantages of UI Devices, by Product Subtype
  • Table 27: Advantages and Disadvantages of Urinary Catheters, by Product Feature
  • Table 28: Selected Advantages and Disadvantages of Vaginal Slings, by Material
  • Table 29: Emerging Products in the UI Device Market
  • Table 30: Stone Management Device Functions, by Product Subtype
  • Table 31: Advantages and Disadvantages of Stone Management Devices, by Product Type
  • Table 32: Advantages and Disadvantages of Holmium Lasers, by Product Feature
  • Table 33: Advantages and Disadvantages of Holmium Laser Fibers, by Durability
  • Table 34: Advantages and Disadvantages of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices, by Product Feature
  • Table 35: Advantages and Disadvantages of Retrieval Devices, by Material
  • Table 36: Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Functions, by Product Subtype
  • Table 37: Advantages and Disadvantages of Prostate Cancer Treatment Devices, by Product Subtype
  • Table 38: BPH Device Functions, by Product Subtype
  • Table 39: Advantages and Disadvantages of BPH Devices, by Product Subtype
  • Table 40: Urological Endoscope Functions, by Product Feature
  • Table 41: Advantages and Disadvantages of Urological Endoscopes, by Product Subtype
  • Table 42: Advantages and Disadvantages of ED Treatment Devices, by Product Subtype

3.0 CLINICAL TRIALS

  • Table 43: Summary of Comparative Study of Intermittent Catheters and Occurrence of Urinary Tract Infections
  • Table 44: Summary of PIVOT
  • Table 45: Summary of Focal Cryoablation in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
  • Table 46: Summary of a Post-Market Study of the AMS AdVance Male Sling System for the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence
  • Table 47: Summary of the Altis Single Incision Sling System for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Study
  • Table 48: Summary of PROPPER

4.0 BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

  • Table 49: Leading Competitors in the Urological Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 50: Leading Competitors in the UI Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 51: Leading Competitors in the Urinary Catheter Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 52: Leading Competitors in the Urine Drainage Bag Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 53: Leading Competitors in the Stone Management Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 54: Leading Competitors in the BPH Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 55: Leading Competitors in the Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 56: Leading Competitors in the Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 57: Leading Competitors in the Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
  • Table 58: Leading Competitors in the ED Treatment Device Market, as a % of Total, US, 2011

5.0 MARKET OUTLOOK

  • Figure 2: Urological Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010-2016
  • Table 59: Factors Impacting the Urological Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 60: Urological Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 3: UI Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 61: Urinary Incontinence Device Procedures, by Product Subtype, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 62: Urinary Incontinence Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 63: Urinary Catheter Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 64: Intermittent Catheter Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 65: Intermittent Catheter Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 66: Intermittent Catheter Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 67: Intermittent Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 68: Intermittent Catheter Strip Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 69: Intermittent Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 70: Intermittent Catheter Closed System Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 71: Intermittent Catheter Closed System Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 72: Intermittent Catheter Closed System Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 73: Intermittent Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 74: Intermittent Catheter Tray Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 75: Intermittent Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 76: Foley Catheter Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 77: Foley Catheter Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 78: Foley Catheter Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 79: Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Material, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 80: Foley Catheter Tray Market Growth, by Material, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 81: Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 82: Latex Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 83: Latex Foley Catheter Tray Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 84: Latex Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 85: Silicone Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 86: Silicone Foley Catheter Tray Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 87: Silicone Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 88: Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Material, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 89 Foley Catheter Strip Market Growth, by Material, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 90: Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 91: Latex Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 92: Latex Foley Catheter Strip Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 93: Latex Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 94: Silicone Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 95: Silicone Foley Catheter Strip Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 96: Silicone Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 97: MEC Market, by Material, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 98: MEC Market Growth, by Material, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 99: MEC Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 100: Vaginal Sling Procedures, by Material, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 101: Vaginal Sling Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 102: Vaginal Sling Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 103: Vaginal Sling Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 104: Urine Drainage Bag Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 105: Urine Drainage Bag Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 106: Urine Drainage Bag Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 107: AUS Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 108: Male Sling Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 109: UBA Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 4: Stone Management Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 110: Stone Management Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 111: Stone Management Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 112: Stone Management Device Market Growth, by Product Subtype, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 113: Stone Management Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 114: Ureteral Stent Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 115: Holmium Laser Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 116: Holmium Laser Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 117: Holmium Laser Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 118: Holmium Laser Fiber Market, by Durability, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 119: Holmium Laser Fiber Market Growth, by Durability, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 120: Holmium Laser Fiber Market, by Durability, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 121: Retrieval Device Market, by Material, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 122: Retrieval Device Market Growth, by Material, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 123: Retrieval Device Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 124: ESWL Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 125: ESWL Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 126: ESWL Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 127: Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 128: Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 129: Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 130: Combination Lithotripsy Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 131: Combination Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 132: Combination Lithotripsy Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 133: Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 134: Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 135: Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 136: EHL Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 137: EHL Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 138: EHL Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 139: Pneumatic Lithotripsy Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 5: BPH Device Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 140: BPH Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 141: BPH Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 142: PVP Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 143: PVP Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 144: PVP Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 145: Holmium Laser Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 146: Holmium Laser Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 147: Holmium Laser Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 148: TUMT Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 149: Prostatic Stent Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 150: Prostatic Stent Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 151: Prostatic Stent Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 152: TURP Device Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 153: TURP Device Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 154: TURP Device Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 155: Thulium Laser Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 156: Thulium Laser Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 157: Thulium Laser Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 158: RF Ablation Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 6: Urological Endoscope Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2011 and 2016
  • Table 159: Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 160: Rigid Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 161: Rigid Urological Endoscope Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 162: Rigid Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 163: Flexible Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 164: Flexible Urological Endoscope Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 165: Flexible Urological Endoscope Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 166: Urological Endoscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 167: Rigid Cystoscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 168: Rigid Cystoscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 169: Rigid Cystoscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 170: Semirigid Ureteroscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 171: Semirigid Ureteroscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 172: Semirigid Ureteroscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 173: Rigid Resectoscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 174: Rigid Resectoscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 175: Rigid Resectoscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 176: Rigid Nephroscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 177: Rigid Nephroscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 178: Rigid Nephroscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 179: Flexible Ureteroscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 180: Flexible Ureteroscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 181: Flexible Ureteroscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 182: Flexible Cystoscope Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 183: Flexible Fiber Cystoscope Market, by Origin, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 184: Flexible Fiber Cystoscope Market Growth, by Origin, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 185: Flexible Fiber Cystoscope Market, by Origin, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 186: Video Flexible Cystoscope Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 7: Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 187: Prostate Cancer Treatments, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 188: Radiation Prostate Cancer Treatments, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 189: Prostatectomies, by Approach, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 190: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Product Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 191: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Product Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 192: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Product Type, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 193: Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market, by Product Type, by Product Subtype, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 194: Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market Growth, by Product Subtype, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 195: Prostate Cancer Treatment Device Market, by Product Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 196: Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 197: Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 198: Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 199: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 200: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 201: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 202: I-125 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 203: I-125 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 204: I-125 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 205: I-125 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 206: I-125 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 207: I-125 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 208: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 209: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 210: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 211: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 212: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 213: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 214: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 215: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 216: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 217: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 218: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 219: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 220: Cryoablation Device Market, by Base & Components, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 221: Cryoablation Device Market Growth, by Base & Components, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 222: Cryoablation Device Market, by Base & Components, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 8: ED Treatment Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 223: ED Treatment Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 224: ED Treatment Device Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 225: ED Treatment Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

  • MRG Acronyms and Initialisms

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

US Markets for Urological Devices 2012 published by Millennium Research Group in April 30, 2012. This report price starts from US $ 7195.

The contents of this page may be different from the latest version. Please contact us for details.

Back to Top