Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Telecom & IT > Digital Broadcasting > Taking the temperature of mobile TV
Category
Telecom & IT (11444)
Broadband (398)
Contact Centers (152)
Contents (612)
Convergence (197)
Data Center (351)
Digital Broadcasting (309)
E-commerce (204)
IT Outsourcing (321)
IT Security (495)
LBS (150)
Mobile Device (721)
Mobile Subscribers (128)
Network (632)
Network & Access Devices (256)
Next Generation Wireless Com (538)
NFC (148)
Online Marketing (138)
Operator Company Profile (766)
Optical Network (266)
RFID (250)
Satellite Telecom (130)
Set-Top Box (61)
Software (1025)
UC (299)
Web-Service (487)
Wireless LAN/WiMAX (547)
Market Research Report

Taking the temperature of mobile TV

Published by Ovum, Ltd.
Published April, 2009 Product code 90780
Content info 37 pages
Price
US $ 2175 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 5438 PDF by E-mail (Global License)


Taking the temperature of mobile TV published by Ovum, Ltd. in April, 2009. This report consists of 37 pages and the price starts from US $ 2175.

Introduction

Abstract

Mobile TV over 3G is well established in developed markets, and is bedding down in fast-track developing markets such as India and Russia. Mobile operators have put a lot of effort into launching and promoting mobile TV and video.

Table of Contents

  • Executive summary
  • In a nutshell
  • Scope of the report
  • Key messages
  • Are mobile TV and video worth all the effort?
  • Scope for improvement
  • Broadening the range of device types
  • Device availability: Japan and South Korea versus Europe
  • The case for and against new mobile broadcast networks
  • Supporting free content: various business models
  • Mobile TV: the state of play
  • Mobile broadcast TV services have made very uneven progress
  • More trials - and tribulations
  • Mobile DTV on the horizon in the US
  • Consumer perspective
  • Ovum' s end-user surveys
  • Mobile phones still low on the list for viewing online video
  • Regional view
  • Cost continues to be an issue for consumers
  • Mobile TV: towards a mass-market service
  • Mobile TV still not ‘mass' in most markets
  • Ease of use; quality viewing experience
  • Selection of channels and content
  • Wide selection of affordable mass-market devices
  • Think outside the mobile phone box
  • Simple, attractive service packaging and pricing
  • Sustainable business model
  • A complex value chain in which relationships can be fraught
  • The continuing struggle to make money
  • Does mobile DTV help or hinder carriers?
  • Orange France: mobile TV 3G success story
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Service overview
  • Performance
  • Service evolution
  • Service offering
  • Content partners
  • Electronic service guide
  • Pricing model
  • 3 Italy: leader in a European DVB-H hotbed
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Service overview
  • The service proposition
  • Comparison cases in Italy
  • TIM and Vodafone
  • Business models: MNO-integrated versus partnership
  • MediaFLO mobile broadcast TV services in the US market
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • MediaFLO' s wholesale model
  • Service overview
  • Coverage
  • Close-up on Verizon
  • Close-up on AT&T
  • Service developments
  • Usage
  • Room to build the service
  • A threat on the horizon
  • DMB in South Korea: challenging times for pioneer services
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Market and service overview
  • T-DMB service
  • S-DMB service
  • Performance
  • T-DMB service performance
  • Launch of paid-for interactive services
  • S-DMB service

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Summary of selected mobile broadcast TV services (part I)
  • Table 2: Summary of selected mobile broadcast TV services (part II)
  • Table 3: Summary of mobile TV content formats
  • Table 4: T- DMB service providers in South Korea
  • Table 5: Tariff plans of TU Media

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Global view: frequency of video viewing by device type
  • Figure 2: The foundations for mobile TV
  • Figure 3: The mobile broadcast value chain
  • Figure 4: Contrasting approaches of 3 and Mediaset
  • Figure 5: The MediaFLO business model
  • Figure 6: Shareholder structure of TU Media (December 2008)
  • Figure 7: T-DMB and S-DMB compared
Back to Top