Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Biotechnology > Building Biotech Technology Transfer Opportunities: Sponsor and developer strategies for success
Category
Biotechnology (1536)
Antibody & Immunity (193)
Biomarker (169)
Biomaterials (56)
Biotechnology Equipment (359)
Gene Therapeutics & RNAi (115)
Genome-based Drug Discovery (204)
Molecular Targeted Therapeutics (51)
Personalized Medicine (57)
Regenerative Medicine (122)
Market Research Report

Building Biotech Technology Transfer Opportunities: Sponsor and developer strategies for success

Published by Business Insights
Published February, 2010 Product code 114753
Content info 137 pages
Price
US $ 3835 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 14382 PDF by E-mail (Global Site License)


Building Biotech Technology Transfer Opportunities: Sponsor and developer strategies for success published by Business Insights in February, 2010. This report consists of 137 pages and the price starts from US $ 3835.

Introduction

Abstract

Drug developers have long been under pressure to introduce new products in an environment of escalating R&D costs, blockbuster patent expiration and resulting generic competition. Current weak economic conditions have exacerbated these challenges with sweeping R&D staff and budget reductions. In order to remain competitive, drug makers must now do more with less. Technology transfer, particularly of new biotechnologies that offer novel means to address unmet medical needs, offer a way to cost effectively address these challenges. They also provide technology developers with a mechanism to monetize their inventions. However, while some drug makers and technology developers have optimized their biotech tech transfer methodologies and have developed sophisticated processes to select, monitor and manage a wide range of relationships, many other biotech tech transfer projects fail. A large proportion of these failures could be averted as many of the most common reasons for failure are preventable problems relating to due diligence failures, shortcomings in deal structure, management changes, cultural challenges, and inappropriate project organization and expectations. This report provides details on how to avoid these common pitfalls with case studies that illustrate best practices.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

  • Overview of biotech tech transfer
  • Why biotech tech transfer deals fail
  • Strategies to ensure successful biotech tech transfer deals
  • The future of biotech tech transfer deals

Chapter 1 Overview of biotech tech transfer

  • Summary
  • The biotechnology industry today
    • Biotechnology technologies and techniques
      • Proliferation of investigational products
    • Funding issues
      • Need to partner to advance product development
    • The emergence of biotechnology brokers
  • Drug development challenges
    • More complicated disease targets
    • Escalating costs
    • Increased regulatory scrutiny
    • Diminished in-house R&D resources
  • Types of biotech tech transfer relationships
    • Academic R&D infusions
    • Biotech biotech deals
    • Pharma biotech alliances
      • Licensing
      • R&D collaborations
      • Sales, distribution and co-marketing agreements
      • Joint ventures
      • Acquisitions
  • Volume of recent deals
  • Relationship trends
    • Volume and value
    • Ownership
  • Conclusion

Chapter 2 Why biotech tech transfer deals fail

  • Summary
  • High failure rates
    • Symptoms of deal failure
    • Factors that do not affect deal failure
  • Implications of deal failure
    • Impact on technology developers
    • Impact on technology sponsors
    • Lost value of failed deals
  • Main causes of biotech tech transfer failure
    • Due diligence failures
      • Technology performance
      • Patent issues
      • Developer organization strength
    • Deal structure
      • Financial compensation
    • Management changes
    • Cultural differences
    • Project organization and expectations
    • Other preventable problems
    • Technology failure
  • Conclusion

Chapter 3 Strategies to ensure successful biotech tech transfer deals

  • Summary
  • Measures of success
    • Success for the technology developer
    • Success for the technology sponsor
  • Key biotech tech transfer strategies
    • Strategies for both technology developers and sponsors
      • Meeting technology challenges
    • Strategies for technology developers
      • Optimizing resources
      • Thinking like a customer
      • Working with professional tech transfer organizations
      • Prolific publishing
    • Strategies for technology sponsors
      • Thorough technology identification and due diligence
      • Structuring innovative deal terms
      • Addressing compensation issues
      • Fostering an entrepreneurial developer environment
      • Ensuring effective alliance management
      • Navigating cultural chasms
      • Addressing international intellectual property challenges
  • Conclusion

Chapter 4 The future of biotech tech transfer deals

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • The future of drug development
    • Impact of the economy
    • US healthcare reform
    • Biosimilars
  • Biotechnology in 2010 - 2015
    • Where biotech fits into Big Pharma
    • Dedicated biotechnology companies
  • Biotech tech transfer deal trends 2010 - 2015
    • Volume and value
    • Ownership
    • Intellectual property issues
    • Success rates
  • Conclusion

Index

List of Figures

  • Figure 1.1: Frequency of biotech tech transfer deals by type of institution
  • Figure 1.2: Number and volume of biopartnering deals, 1997 - 2009
  • Figure 1.3: Acquisitions as a proportion of biotech tech transfer deals,
  • Figure 2.4: Characteristics of biotech tech transfer failure causes
  • Figure 2.5: Relative importance to sponsor of technology developer
  • Figure 3.6: Strategies to optimize biotech tech transfer opportunities
  • Figure 4.7: Biopharmaceutical vs. other pharmaceutical sales, 2009 - 2015
  • Figure 4.8: Impact of industry and economic trends on conventional and biotech drug developers, 2009 - 2015
  • Figure 4.9: Relative importance of biotechnology for leading pharmaceutical companies, 2009 2015
  • Figure 4.10: Number and average size of global biotech companies, 2009 - 2015
  • Figure 4.11: Number and volume of biopartnering deals, 2009 - 2015

List of Tables

  • Table 1.1: Definition of biotechnology techniques
  • Table 1.2: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009
  • Table 1.3: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.4: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.5: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.6: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.7: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.8: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.9: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.10: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.11: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.12: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.13: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.14: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.15: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 1.16: Biotech tech transfer deals, 2009 (Contd.)
  • Table 3.17: Technology transfer areas of interest for Merck & Co., 2010
  • Table 3.18: Technology transfer areas of interest for Merck & Co., 2010 (Contd.)
  • Table 3.19: Novartis private equity fund holdings, 2010
  • Table 3.20: Novartis private equity fund holdings, 2010 (Contd.)
  • Table 3.21: Novartis private equity fund holdings, 2010 (Contd.)
  • Table 3.22: Novartis private equity fund holdings, 2010 (Contd.)
  • Table 4.23: Millions of older and overweight persons in the US and EU, 2009 - 2015
  • Table 4.24: Biosimilars approved in the US and EU, 2010
Back to Top