Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Pharmaceutical > Pharmaceutical Companies > Key Trends In Drug-diagnostic Co-development: Identifying collaborative opportunities and navigating regulatory challenges
Category
Pharmaceutical (4989)
Bone Disease Treatment (46)
Cancer (883)
Diabetes (159)
Drug Delivery System (184)
Drug Discovery (1403)
Generic Drugs (128)
Infectious Disease (406)
Mental Disease (98)
Neurodegenerative Disease (180)
Obesity Treatment (49)
OTC Drug (149)
Pharmaceutical Companies (562)
Prescription Drugs (120)
Regulation (122)
Vaccines (178)
Veterinary Medicine (28)
Market Research Report

Key Trends In Drug-diagnostic Co-development: Identifying collaborative opportunities and navigating regulatory challenges

Published by Business Insights
Published June, 2009 Product code 92690
Content info 114 pages
Price
US $ 3835 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 14381 PDF by E-mail (Global Site License)


Key Trends In Drug-diagnostic Co-development: Identifying collaborative opportunities and navigating regulatory challenges published by Business Insights in June, 2009. This report consists of 114 pages and the price starts from US $ 3835.

Introduction

Abstract

The development of genomics-based molecular diagnostics that are linked to therapeutic products is critical to targeted drug developments of the future. The potential for molecular diagnostics to be used as companion products for personalized treatments that are based on patient characteristics will contribute to a growing trend for new partnerships between drug companies and diagnostic firms. ' Key Trends in Drug-Diagnostic Co-Development' is a new report published by Business Insights that explores the potential for applying genomic-based diagnostics to new drug developments, and the resultant implications for the pharma/biotech and diagnostic industries. This report examines the commercial and regulatory challenges facing drug-diagnostic combinations and evaluates emerging business models to identify the most effective forms of pharmacodiagnostic partnership. This report also reviews 28 collaborative agreements for the co-development of drug-diagnostics and determines which combinations can be expected to result in commercial products in the near future.

Table of Contents

Executive summary

  • Introduction to drug-diagnostic co-development
  • Regulatory challenges
  • Commercial challenges
  • Emerging business models
  • Rx-Dx collaborations
  • Future trends

Chapter 1 Introduction to drug-diagnostic co-development

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Technology driving change
  • Biomarkers & personalized medicine
  • Convergence of players
  • The role of Dx in personalized medicine
  • Targeted therapeutic developments
  • New industry partnerships
  • Companion test development models

Chapter 2 Regulatory challenges

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • US regulatory landscape
  • Voluntary genomic data submissions (VGDS)
  • Rx-Dx co-development guidance
  • IVDMIA guidance
  • Dx usage determines risk
  • Study design
  • EU regulatory process
  • IVD regulatory framework under discussion
  • Pharmacogenomics in drug development
  • Potential advantages of the EU system
  • Case Study: K-RAS

Chapter 3 Key commercial challenges

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Reimbursement
  • Information requirements
  • European situation
  • Case Study: Oncotype DX
  • Role of health economics
  • Third-party studies
  • Clinical use
  • Different clinical settings
  • Intellectual property

Chapter 4 Emerging business models

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • One-stop shop
  • Case Study: Roche
    • Acquisitions
    • Alignment of business areas
    • Companion Dx programs
  • Rx-Dx industry partnerships
  • Drivers of co-development partnerships
  • Types of agreements
  • Case Study: Pfizer-Monogram Biosciences
  • Collaborations underway

Chapter 5 Rx-Dx collaborations

Summary

  • Introduction

Asuragen

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Merck & Co

BG Medicine

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Cordex Pharma

bioMerieux

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Ispen
    • Merck & Co
  • ADNA project

Celera

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Abbott
    • Merck & Co
    • Ipsen

Curidium

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Takeda

Dako

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • OSI Pharmaceuticals
    • Genentech
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb

DxS

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Amgen
    • Roche Molecular Diagnostics

GE Healthcare

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Eli Lilly

Genomic Health

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Pfizer
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb and Imclone Systems

HistoRx

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Lilly

LabCorp

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • ARCA biopharma
    • Vanda Pharmaceuticals
    • Medco Health Solutions

Monogram Biosciences

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Pfizer HIV partnership
    • Oncology

OncoMethylome Sciences

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Merck KGaA
    • Schering-Plough
    • GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
    • Abbott

Source MDx

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Pfizer

XDx

  • Background
  • Collaboration
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb

Chapter 6 Future trends

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • New paradigm for pharma R&D
  • Rx-Dx combinations in pipeline
  • Changing dynamics of the IVD industry
  • Biomarker discovery for existing drugs
  • Next generation tests
  • Conclusions

Appendix 112

  • Research methodology
  • Glossary
  • Index

List of Figures

  • Figure 1.1: Biomarker discovery is comparable to drug discovery
  • Figure 1.2: Convergence of drug and diagnostic industries
  • Figure 1.3: Main therapy areas for Rx-Dx co-development (number of diagnostic tests)
  • Figure 1.4: Ideal Rx-Dx co-development scenario
  • Figure 1.5: Alternative co-development scenarios
  • Figure 2.6: Regulatory pathways for diagnostics in the US
  • Figure 2.7: Problems when patient accrual is gated via non-final IVD
  • Figure 3.8: Pre and post-approval challenges of Rx-Dx co-development
  • Figure 3.9: Difference between obtaining reimbursement in US and Europe
  • Figure 4.10: Roche Group sales by type (% of revenues), 2008
  • Figure 4.11: Diagnostic input for pharma projects
  • Figure 4.12: Rx-Dx partnership opportunities
  • Figure 6.13: Biomarker R&D expenditure ($bn), 2003 vs 2009
  • Figure 6.14: Forecast sales in IVD market ($bn), 2007-2012

List of Tables

  • Table 1.1: Drugs for which testing is recommended/required in the US
  • Table 1.2: Co-developed Rx-Dx combinations on market
  • Table 4.3: Biomarker strategy for Phase I/II oncology drugs
  • Table 4.4: Summary of Rx-Dx Co-Development Projects
  • Table 5.5: Rx-Dx co-development projects under review
  • Table 6.6: Patient population in whom selected drugs do not work (% population)
Back to Top