Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Medical Device > Orthopedic > The Plastic Surgery Opportunity Index: Capitalizing on Market Gaps
Category
Medical Device (4399)
Cardiovascular Device (252)
Catheter Equipment (209)
CT and MRI and X ray (146)
Dental Equipment (177)
Disposable Medical Device (83)
Endoscopy Equipment (114)
Healthcare IT (310)
In Vitro Diagnostics Equipment (436)
Medical Imaging (425)
Molecular Imaging/Agents (29)
Nuclear Medical (76)
Ophthalmic Equipment (105)
Orthopedic (343)
Patient Monitoring (384)
Ultra Sound (50)
Wound Care (120)
Market Research Report

The Plastic Surgery Opportunity Index: Capitalizing on Market Gaps

Published by Valid Results, Inc
Published November, 2006 Product code 55684
Content info 66 pages
Price
US $ 3500 Hard Copy (Single User License)
US $ 3500 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 3500 PDF On CD-ROM (Single User License)
US $ 4200 Hard Copy (Global Site License)
US $ 4200 PDF by E-mail (Global Site License)
US $ 4200 PDF On CD-ROM (Global Site License)


The Plastic Surgery Opportunity Index: Capitalizing on Market Gaps published by Valid Results, Inc in November, 2006. This report consists of 66 pages and the price starts from US $ 3500.

Introduction

Abstract

Introduction:

The results feature a summary of surgeons' perceptions regarding the importance of specific features in evaluating manufacturers, as well as the relative performance of featured manufacturers. The analysis includes a multivariate metric to compare the relative positioning of competing manufacturers. Also included is a positioning of competitive manufacturers based on the perceived strength of association with listed qualities.

The results of the data analysis indicate Mentor, Inamed, Ethicon and Allergan are perceived to be superior to the other featured companies. Product efficacy, clinical data and cost are identified as the attributes most important in determining preferences. The relative performance of the companies varies on the featured attributes, as well as their perceived positioning on general considerations. The product surgeons most strongly associate with each featured company is identified, and for some companies the strength of association is much greater.

The information has applicability to advertising, sales, communications, product launches, forecasting, and strategic planning, as well as other business functions.

Methodology and Purpose of this Research

100 American Medical Association (AMA) board certified plastic surgeons were randomly selected from a list of 6300 surgeons to participate in a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) featured on the internet. Upon completion of the SAQ, 20 of the participants were selected to participate in a follow-up depth interview conducted via the telephone.

The purpose of the study is to develop an overview of the perceived positioning of featured companies and the considerations associated with determining a company' s position.

Measurement Objectives

  • Importance of various considerations in determining product preferences
    • Rating of featured considerations
    • Importance weighting of various categories of considerations
      • Product quality
      • Pricing
      • Innovation
      • Training / Continuing education
      • Sales reps
      • Surgeon support / Customer service
      • Clinical data
      • Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
  • Manufacturer awareness and experience
    • Allergan
    • Bard / Davol
    • BioForm
    • Byron Medical
    • Candela
    • Ethicon
    • Implantech
    • Inamed
    • Integra
    • Medicis
    • Mentor
    • Spectrum
    • Thermage
    • Tyco
  • Measure overall perception of manufacturers (top-of-mind word associations)
    • First-to-mind product for various manufacturers (listed above)
    • Manufacturers associated with featured considerations
      • Traditional
      • Up and coming
      • Declining
      • Cutting edge
      • Flexible
      • Professional
      • Established

Table of Contents

  • Introduction & Report Overview
    • Abstract
    • Measurement Objectives
    • Sample design and distribution
    • Measurement & Data Collection design
    • How to read this report
  • Executive Summary & Key Findings
  • Detailed Findings
    • I. Importance of various considerations for plastic surgeons in selecting product preference
      • a. Important considerations influencing product preferences for plastic surgeons
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
      • b. Plastic Surgeons ratings of importance considerations
        • (1= No Importance...5= Very Important)
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
    • II. Awareness & Associations of Plastic Surgery Product Manufacturers
      • a. Plastic Surgeons Awareness and experience with featured manufacturers
        • (Unaware)
        • (Aware but don' t use)
        • (Currently use)
        • (Used in the past but discontinued)
        • i. Allergan
        • ii. Bard / Davol
        • iii. BioForm
        • iv. Byron Medical
        • v. Candela
        • vi. Ethicon
        • vii. Implantech
        • viii. Inamed
        • ix. Integra
        • x. Medicis
        • xi. Mentor
        • xii. Spectrum
        • xiii. Thermage
        • xiv. Tyco
      • b. Top of mind products for featured manufacturers to plastic surgeons
      • c. For plastic surgeons, which manufacturer comes to mind given the following terms
        • i. Traditional
        • ii. Professional
        • iii. Established
        • iv. Flexible
        • v. Up and Coming
        • vi. Declining
        • vii. Cutting Edge
    • III. Plastic Surgeons Perceptions of Manufacturer Performance
      • a. Which of these companies is the best overall according to plastic surgeons
        • i. Allergan
        • ii. Bard / Davol
        • iii. BioForm
        • iv. Byron Medical
        • v. Candela
        • vi. Ethicon
        • vii. Implantech
        • viii. Inamed
        • ix. Integra
        • x. Medicis
        • xi. Mentor
        • xii. Spectrum
        • xiii. Thermage
        • xiv. Tyco
      • b. Which of these companies is the worst overall according to plastic surgeons
        • i. Allergan
        • ii. Bard / Davol
        • iii. BioForm
        • iv. Byron Medical
        • v. Candela
        • vi. Ethicon
        • vii. Implantech
        • viii. Inamed
        • ix. Integra
        • x. Medicis
        • xi. Mentor
        • xii. Spectrum
        • xiii. Thermage
        • xiv. Tyco
      • c. Manufacturer performance ratings on the following considerations
        • i. Product quality
        • ii. Pricing
        • iii. Innovation
        • iv. Training / Continuing education
        • v. Sales reps
        • vi. Surgeon support / Customer service
        • vii. Clinical data
        • viii. Business assistance (marketing, advertising)
      • d. Derived positioning ratings by featured manufacturers
      • e. Derived performance ratings by featured considerations
  • Conclusions
    • Recommendations
    • Suggested Analysis
  • About the Author / Valid Results

Table of Figures

  • Figure A-1 Geographical Spread of Respondents
  • Table 1-1 Considerations Influencing Product Preferences
  • Table 1-2 Categories of Considerations Influencing Product Preferences
  • Figure 1-1 Top 3 Important Considerations
  • Table 1-3 Importance of Considerations
  • Figure 1-2 90% Confidence Intervals Importance Means
  • Table 2-1 Company Product Experience
  • Table 2-2 Allergan ? Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-3 Bard/Davol Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-4 Bioform Medical Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-5 Byron Medical Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-6 Candela Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-7 Ethicon Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-8 Implantech Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-9 Inamed Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-10 Integra Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-11 Medicis Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-12 Mentor Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-13 Spectrum Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-14 Thermage Top of Mind Product
  • Table 2-15 Tyco Top of Mind Product
  • Figure 2-1 Summary of Manufacturer and Product Associations
  • Table 2-16 Top of Mind Company
  • Table 2-17 Top of Mind Company continued
  • Figure 2-2 Relative Positioning of Various Companies
  • Table 3-1 Best Companies Overall
  • Table 3-2 Worst Companies Overall
  • Figure 3-1 90% Confidence Interval Overall Opinion Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-2 90% Confidence Interval Quality Mean Rating
  • Figure 3-3 90% Confidence Interval Pricing Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-4 90% Confidence Interval Innovation Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-5 90% Confidence Interval Training/Education Means Ratings
  • Figure 3-6 90% Confidence Interval Sales Rep Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-7 90% Confidence Interval Support Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-8 90% Confidence Interval Clinical Data Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-9 90% Confidence Interval Business Assistance Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-10 90% Overall Value Mean Ratings
  • Figure 3-11 Allergan Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-12 Bard/Davol Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-13 BioForm Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-14 Byron Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-15 Candella Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-16 Ethicon Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-17 Implantech Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-18 Inamed Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-19 Integra Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-20 Medicis Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-21 Mentor Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-22 Spectrum Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-23 Thermage Derived Performance
  • Figure 3-24 Tyco Derived Performance
Back to Top