Home Category Region Publishers About Us Contact Us
Japanese Korean Chinese
Home > Market Research Report > Telecom & IT > Web-Service > Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, 2009 to 2015
Category
Telecom & IT (11491)
Broadband (400)
Contact Centers (153)
Contents (614)
Convergence (197)
Data Center (350)
Digital Broadcasting (310)
E-commerce (204)
IT Outsourcing (321)
IT Security (498)
LBS (151)
Mobile Device (724)
Mobile Subscribers (128)
Network (634)
Network & Access Devices (256)
Next Generation Wireless Com (538)
NFC (148)
Online Marketing (138)
Operator Company Profile (768)
Optical Network (266)
RFID (250)
Satellite Telecom (130)
Set-Top Box (61)
Software (1026)
UC (299)
Web-Service (489)
Wireless LAN/WiMAX (547)
Market Research Report

Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, 2009 to 2015

Published by WinterGreen Research, Inc.
Published April, 2009 Product code 86437
Content info 954 PAGES 333 TABLES AND FIGURES
Price
US $ 3400 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 3400 PDF by E-mail (Single User License) & Hard Copy
US $ 6800 PDF by E-mail (Site License)


Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, 2009 to 2015 published by WinterGreen Research, Inc. in April, 2009. This report consists of 954 PAGES 333 TABLES AND FIGURES and the price starts from US $ 3400.

Introduction

Abstract

LEXINGTON, Massachusetts (April 18, 2009) - WinterGreen Research announces that it has a new study on Worldwide services oriented architecture (SOA) infrastructure markets. The 2009 study has 954 pages, 333 Tables and Figures. Worldwide services oriented architecture (SOA) infrastructure is poised to achieve significant growth as IT seeks to build software that is more flexible, less expensive to buy and operate, and supports flexible response to changing market conditions. The infrastructure markets are poised for rapid growth as companies implements web services in controlled environments.

Services Oriented Architecture SOA Infrastructure Market Strategy, Market Shares, and Market Forecasts, 2009-2015 IBM dominates SOA with 70% of the market, the rest of market is divided between 12 other participants with measurable market share, none of whom have even been able to garner as much as 8% of the market. IBM is the defacto industry standard leader in SOA. IBM dominates the SOA infrastructure markets with an infrastructure offering that can be used to achieve integration in a heterogeneous IT environment and solid services support to permit the large enterprises to change their business model.

IBM stands alone as a leader in SOA, inventing the concept of refining reusable solutions that have been around for a long time, adding a unique component and SOA manner, by making the SOA components work to create a worldwide integrated enterprise. While the IBM SOA is able to be used as a solution that works across a global enterprise, the SOA services as implemented in a middleware infrastructure are flexible enough to provide for local variation.

Innovation is what drives market growth in every industry. IBM and the major SOA vendors are finding new ways to support innovation, providing software that supports flexible response to changing market conditions. SOA reaches into every industry and every segment of the economy. SOA drives innovation. It is equally useful for very large enterprises, mid range size companies, and very small organizations.

Services oriented architecture (SOA) represents a fundamental change in the way automated process is delivered to replace manual process. Service enabling offerings are a response to the fundamental change in IT, where enterprise competitive advantage is gained from having IT flexibility. Software infrastructure companies have ' service enabled' their offerings in response to demand for the flexibility needed to operate a global enterprise. This service enabling of offerings represents a promise that the software vendor has the ability to build solutions that can be modified and updated in response to changing market conditions.

Enterprise IT departments use SOA to tie together the various assets and get more from the existing investment. To accomplish this, systems integration is needed to create ever changing solutions. Software infrastructure vendors need a strong middleware infrastructure as a fundamental underpinning to creating SOA that works. The ability to create and support service enabled offerings depends on having a strong middleware offering.

Innovation is supported by SOA. SOA can be used to change IT environments to support innovation. Issues affecting enterprises relate to IT efficiency. IT is seeking to respond to the decline of the financial markets and the collapse of the economy with cost cutting that still achieves automated process. All enterprises have a multitude of IT systems and applications to meet their varied and growing business requirements.

SOA represents a way to decrease IT costs by a quantum amount. Costs can be reduced by 90%. Implementing SOA needs to be done on an application by application basis. Each of these individual systems and applications has their own way of storing and exchanging business data. Business processes span multiple applications and integrating them to facilitate flow of information using SOA has created challenges for IT.

SOA stacks of decoupled services are purpose built for the enterprise environment that is continuously shifting because of mergers and acquisitions. With decoupled software solutions, the web services and the SOA components can be portable. SOA markets at $3.3 billion in 2008 are anticipated to grow at an average rate of 17.1% per year to $10.3 billion by 2015. Growth is a result of IT department efforts to reduce spending on run time and to spend a higher proportion of their budgets on growing the business.

Research Methodology

WinterGreen Research authors use a structured, consistent, and detailed research approach. The methodology supports an analytical approach to market research. In depth comparisons are made of many aspects of the market. Data relating to Industry segments is developed to permit presentation of forecasts and market share positioned to have substantive value.

Research has been automated using interactive surveys that implement delta trend analysis and instant messaging in combination with e-mail. Automation is made possible because of a proprietary engine that implements multi-layered cell based analysis. Modular systems support dynamic computing that use a graphical configuration engine to reach more people in a research modality.

Full spectrum research and information services, including market reports, customized research, and customer interviewing are available, reports and research are positioned to provide strategic value to industry participants, strategic planners, and product managers.

New systems combine sales tools and independent industry analysis, seeking to leverage the expertise of the sales force and combine it with the skepticism of the analysts to provide accurate return on investment analysis.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

  • SOA Infrastructure Market Driving Forces
    • SOA Market Driving Forces
  • SOA Infrastructure Market Shares
    • IBM Leads SOA Markets
    • IBM Services Oriented Architecture Characterized By
    • The Depth And Breadth Of The Product Line
    • Economic Collapse Issues Affecting Enterprises
    • SOA Brings Business Process to IT
  • SOA Market Forecasts

1. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Description and Dynamics

  • 1.1 Issues Affecting Enterprises
  • 1.2 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Interconnects Siloed Applications
    • 1.2.1 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Improves IT Efficiency
    • 1.2.2 SOA Management Systems
    • 1.2.3 SOA Management and Security
    • 1.2.4 IBMR Positioned As The Market Leader In SOA
    • 1.2.5 SOA Management
    • 1.2.6 Monitor And Manage SOA Application Service Levels
  • 1.3 SOA Security Challenges
  • 1.4 Mission Critical Massaging and SOAP
  • 1.5 SOA Automatic Service Failover Protection
  • 1.6 Benefits of SOA
    • 1.6.1 SOA Facilitates Integration Beyond The Enterprise Network
  • 1.7 SOA Data Integration
    • 1.7.1 Encapsulating Business Logic As Services
    • 1.7.2 Composite Applications
  • 1.8 SOA Creates The Agile Business
    • 1.8.1 SOA Return on Investment (ROI)
    • 1.8.2 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Layers
    • 1.8.3 Service-Oriented Architecture Business Benefits
    • 1.8.4 IBM WebSphere Integration Workflow Support
  • 1.9 Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
    • 1.9.1 Service-Oriented Architecture IT Benefits
    • 1.9.2 SOA Self-Assessment
    • 1.9.3 Service Infrastructure
    • 1.9.4 Infrastructure Implementations Using SOA Products
    • 1.9.5 SOA Technology Principles
    • 1.9.6 Decoupled Services Value
    • 1.9.7 Security
  • 1.10 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Automates Key Business Processes
    • 1.10.1 SOA Virtual Experience
    • 1.10.2 SOA Building a Channel
    • 1.10.3 SOA Integration Platform
    • 1.10.4 SOA Infrastructure Supports Delivery of Information As A Service
  • 1.11 Services Oriented Applications (SOA) Unlock Business Value
    • 1.11.1 Aligning Business Process And Technology
    • 1.11.2 Business Process Challenges
    • 1.11.3 Business Environment
  • 1.12 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Ability To Transform Business
    • 1.12.1 Services Oriented Architecture Works By Abstracting Business Processes
    • 1.12.2 Dynamically Building Application Portfolios
    • 1.12.3 Flexible Application Framework
  • 1.13 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Workflow
    • 1.13.1 Infrastructure for Services Oriented Architectures Services-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • 1.14 Web Services Standards
  • 1.15 SOA Development Methodology
  • 1.16 SOA Creates Transformation Requirements For Document Interchanges
    • 1.16.1 Information Is Mapped From Nodes In A Source Schema To Nodes In The Destination Schema

2. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Shares and Forecasts

  • 2.1 SOA Infrastructure Market Driving Forces
    • 2.1.1 Building a Robust Data Integration Layer
    • 2.1.2 SOA Market Segment
    • 2.1.3 SOA Market Driving Forces
  • 2.2 SOA Market Shares
    • 2.2.1 SOA Company Competitive Analysis
    • 2.2.2 Top Competitors IBM, Tibco, Software AG / WebMethods, and Oracle / BEA SOA Platforms
    • 2.2.3 Value of IBM WebSphereMQ, DataPower, and WebSphereMQ Broker to SOA
    • 2.2.4 IBM SOA Model
    • 2.2.5 SOA Components Use IBM WebSphereMQ
    • 2.2.6 IBM WebSphere Application Server Leverages Java Technology as a Stack
    • 2.2.7 IBM SOA Fabric Across The Enterprise To Reuse IT Assets
    • 2.2.8 IBM WebSphere Adapters
    • 2.2.9 Tibco
    • 2.2.10 Tibco Business Process Management on A SOA Foundation
    • 2.2.11 Tibco SOA Business Process Management, Brokers, and Adapters
    • 2.2.12 Software AG webMethods
    • 2.2.13 Software AG
    • 2.2.14 Software AG Solution For SOA Governance
    • 2.2.15 Software AG / webMethods
    • 2.2.16 Microsoft SOA Positioned To Support Building A SOA Application
    • 2.2.17 Oracle / BEA
    • 2.2.18 Sun
    • 2.2.19 Sybase
  • 2.3 SOA Market Forecasts
    • 2.3.1 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Core Process
    • 2.3.2 WebSphereMQ and Tibco Transport Layer Achieve Mission Critical Functionality
    • 2.3.3 SOA Integration Of E-Business
    • 2.3.4 Market Driving Forces For Real Time Exchange of Information
    • 2.3.5 Typical SOA Integration Projects
    • 2.3.6 SOA Business Environment Market Drivers
  • 2.4 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Market Segment Analysis
  • 2.5 Web Services and Component Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Forecasts
  • 2.6 Competitive Factors Affecting The SOA Market
    • 2.6.1 Services Oriented Architecture Market Trends
    • 2.6.2 System z Significantly Less Expensive Than Distributed Computing Environments
    • 2.6.3 Internet Impact
    • 2.6.4 IT Department Need For SOA
    • 2.6.5 SOA Represents The Implementation Of Process From The Desktop
    • 2.6.6 Stack Based vs. Decoupled WebSphereMQ Mission Critical Messaging Approaches to SOA Solutions
    • 2.6.7 Cost, Time And Resources Required To Create And Maintain Integration In A Rapidly Changing Environment
    • 2.6.8 Application Connectivity Infrastructure Enhances E-Business
    • 2.6.9 SOA Service Oriented Architecture Markets
    • 2.6.10 E-Business
  • 2.7 SOA Regional Analysis
  • 2.8 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) For Back End Systems
    • 2.8.1 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Business Benefits
    • 2.8.2 Network Services
    • 2.8.3 SOA Industry Segments
    • 2.8.4 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) For Front End Systems
    • 2.8.5 Customer Service
    • 2.8.6 Partner Business Drivers
    • 2.8.7 Business Process Integration
    • 2.8.8 Integration Of Business Processes
    • 2.8.9 Impact Of Mergers And Acquisitions
    • 2.8.10 Expand Strategic Partnerships
    • 2.8.11 Electronic Commerce
    • 2.8.12 Vendors With A Broad Suite Of Products
    • 2.8.13 Total Segments By Vendor
    • 2.8.14 SOA Integration Broker Segment Market Analysis
  • 2.9 Services Oriented Architecture Challenges

3. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Product Description

  • 3.1 SOA Business Integration Foundation Systems
  • 3.2 IBM Services Oriented Architecture
    • 3.2.1 IBM WebSphereR SOA Service Registry and Repository
    • 3.2.2 IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
    • 3.2.3 IBM SOA Rational Asset Manager
    • 3.2.4 IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Advanced Lifecycle Edition
    • 3.2.5 IBM SOA Response to Complex IT Challenges
    • 3.2.6 IBM WebSphere SOA Publish, Find, Enrich, Manage, And Govern
    • 3.2.7 WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
    • 3.2.8 IBM WebSphere Enables SOA governance:
    • 3.2.9 IBM WebSphere SOA Policy Management
    • 3.2.10 IBM WebSphere Business Services Fabric
    • 3.2.11 IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository SOA Product Positioning
    • 3.2.12 IBM SOA Foundation
    • 3.2.13 IBM SOA Frameworks Free Siloed Data
    • 3.2.14 IBM Rational SOA Governed Service Lifecycle Management
    • 3.2.15 IBM SOA Governance and Service Lifecycle Management
    • 3.2.16 IBMR SOA Governance Lifecycle
    • 3.2.17 IBMR SOA Identification of Areas For Improved Governance
    • 3.2.18 IBM SOA Governance Measure: Monitor and manage the governance process
    • 3.2.19 IBM SOA Policy
    • 3.2.20 IBM SOA Policy Approach Strategy
    • 3.2.21 IBM SOA Governance Deployment
    • 3.2.22 IBM SOA Governance Management
    • 3.2.23 IBM SOA Governance Service Lifecycle Management
    • 3.2.24 IBM SOA Governance and Management Method (SGMM)
    • 3.2.25 IBM SOA Governance Rational Method Composer
    • 3.2.26 IBM SOA Product Framework
    • 3.2.27 IBM Rational Team Concert
    • 3.2.28 IBM Rational ClearcaseR
    • 3.2.29 IBM Rational ClearquestR
    • 3.2.30 IBM Rational Build ForgeR
    • 3.2.31 IBM Rational Software Architect for WebSphere Software
    • 3.2.32 IBM Tivoli Federate Identity And Access Control Across Services
    • 3.2.33 IBM WebSphere DataPower XML Security Gateway XS40
    • 3.2.34 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager (ITCAM) for SOA
    • 3.2.35 IBM SOA Tivoli Business Systems Manager
  • 3.3 Tibco Services Oriented Architecture SOA
    • 3.3.1 Tibco Service Virtualization
    • 3.3.2 Tibco ActiveMatrix
    • 3.3.3 Tibco SOA Solutions
    • 3.3.4 Tibco Monitor, Filter, Analyze, Correlate, And Respond In Real Time
    • 3.3.5 Tibco SOA For Shipping And Distribution
    • 3.3.6 Tibco SOA Support For The Real-Time Enterprise
    • 3.3.7 Tibco SOA Mainframe Service Suite
    • 3.3.8 Tibco Adapter For z/OS
    • 3.3.9 Tibco Object Service Broker
    • 3.3.10 Tibco Business Process Management Substation ES
    • 3.3.11 Tibco ActiveMatrix Business Works Advantage
    • 3.3.12 Tibco SOA Cost Effective Strategy
    • 3.3.13 Tibco Complete Mainframe SOA Solution
    • 3.3.14 Tibco Rendezvous Low Latency Messaging Product For Real-Time High Throughput
  • 3.4 Microsoft SOA Application Platform
    • 3.4.1 Microsoft Application Platform.NET Framework
    • 3.4.2 Microsoft SOA Built-In Support
    • 3.4.3 Microsoft XML
    • 3.4.4 Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
    • 3.4.5 Microsoft BizTalk Server Write Services
    • 3.4.6 Microsoft BizTalk Legacy Systems Implementation
    • 3.4.7 Microsoft BizTalk Server
    • 3.4.8 Microsoft BizTalk Server and Enterprise Service Bus
    • 3.4.9 Microsoft BizTalk Services Visual Studio Team System
    • 3.4.10 Microsoft Visual Studio Team System
    • 3.4.11 Microsoft SOA Static Code Analyzer
    • 3.4.12 Microsoft Efficient Deployment for Service Oriented Applications
    • 3.4.13 Microsoft System Center to Manage SOA Components
    • 3.4.14 Microsoft Oslo Approach To Modeling
    • 3.4.15 Microsoft Oslo Application Development
    • 3.4.16 Microsoft SOA Dynamic IT Modeling Strategy
    • 3.4.17 Microsoft SOA Dynamics
    • 3.4.18 Microsoft Office Business Applications
    • 3.4.19 Microsoft Office Visio SOA Initiatives
    • 3.4.20 Microsoft SOA Solutions
    • 3.4.21 Microsoft SOA Enterprise Service Bus
    • 3.4.22 Microsoft SOA ESB Design Patterns
    • 3.4.23 Microsoft SOA ESB Capabilities
    • 3.4.24 Microsoft Managed Services Engine
    • 3.4.25 Microsoft Windows Server UDDI Services
    • 3.4.26 Microsoft Enterprise UDDI Services
  • 3.5 Oracle / BEA
    • 3.5.1 Oracle SOA Suite
    • 3.5.2 Oracle SOA Governance
    • 3.5.3 Oracle SOA Asset Management Life-Cycle Workflow Capability
    • 3.5.4 Oracle Fusion Middleware
    • 3.5.5 Oracle SOA Application Integration Architecture
  • 3.6 Software AG
    • 3.6.1 webMethods Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Suite
    • 3.6.2 Software AG webMethods SOA CentraSite
    • 3.6.3 Software AG webMethods Government Gateways Leverage SOA Service Oriented Architecture
    • 3.6.4 Software AG webMethods SOA Governance using CentraSite™
    • 3.6.5 Software AG webMethods SOA Governance
  • 3.7 Progress Software SOA
    • 3.7.1 DataDirect Technologies Oracle Partnership
    • 3.7.2 Progress Software DataDirect Technologies zIIP Engine Return On Investment ROI
    • 3.7.3 Progress Software SOA Innovative Middleware Technology
    • 3.7.4 Progress Software Addresses Critical Challenges of SOA Deployment
    • 3.7.5 Progress Software SOA Infrastructure
    • 3.7.6 Progress Web Services Built With Shadow
    • 3.7.7 Progress Actional BPM Platform Modeling And Management
    • 3.7.8 Progress Enterprise Service Bus
    • 3.7.9 Progress Sonic ESB Product Family
    • 3.7.10 Progress SonicMQ Mission Critical Messaging
  • 3.8 Information Builders iWay Universal Adapter Suite for IBM WebSphere Products
  • 3.9 Hewlett Packard (HP)
    • 3.9.1 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Solutions
    • 3.9.2 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Systinet Governance
    • 3.9.3 Hewlett Packard (HP) Scaling SOA
    • 3.9.4 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Quality Management
    • 3.9.5 HP Quality Management Ecosystem
  • 3.10 SAP Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • 3.10.1 SAP Services for SOA
    • 3.10.2 SAP End-to-End Services Meet SOA Project Requirements
    • 3.10.3 SAP Discovery System for SOA
    • 3.10.4 Evaluating Potential of SAP SOA Discovery System
  • 3.11 Sun Microsystems SOA
    • 3.11.1 Sun SOA Benefits
    • 3.11.2 Sun Java™ Composite Application Platform Suite
  • 3.12 AmberPoint
    • 3.12.1 AmberPoint Abstracting the Management Layer
    • 3.12.2 AmberPoint Focus on SOA Discovery &Cataloging
    • 3.12.3 AmberPoint Leveraging Diverse Data Sources for Rich Service Profiles
    • 3.12.4 AmberPoint Maintaining Service Catalogs to Promote Reuse
  • 3.13 AmberPoint SOA Management Products Capabilities
    • 3.13.1 AmberPoint SOA Management System™
    • 3.13.2 AmberPoint SOA Discovery
    • 3.13.3 AmberPoint SOA Explorer
    • 3.13.4 AmberPoint Tracking Transactions across Multiple Application and Technology Layers
    • 3.13.5 AmberPoint SOA Runtime Management
    • 3.13.6 AmberPoint Policy Enforcement Architecture
    • 3.13.7 AmberPoint SOA Security
    • 3.13.8 Amberpoint Security
    • 3.13.9 Amberpoint SOA Security Features
    • 3.13.10 AmberPoint Integrating with the Security Infrastructure
    • 3.13.11 AmberPoint Service Level Management
    • 3.13.12 AmberPoint Service Level Management
    • 3.13.13 AttachmateWRQ
  • 3.14 BMC SOA
  • 3.15 Workday / Cape Clear
    • 3.15.1 Cape Clear SOA Best Practices
    • 3.15.2 Cape Clear Service Versioning in a SOA
    • 3.15.3 Cape Clear SOA Services Co-existence
    • 3.15.4 Cape Clear SOA Services Message Routing
    • 3.15.5 Cape Clear SOA Services Message Migration Strategy
    • 3.15.6 Cape Clear SOA Services Message Performance Testing
  • 3.16 EMC Documentum
    • 3.16.1 EMC Addresses SOA Challenges
    • 3.16.2 EMC SOA Supports Measurable Outcomes
    • 3.16.3 EMC Business Process Management
    • 3.16.4 EMC Business Process Management Challenges
    • 3.16.5 EMC SOA Information Architecture
    • 3.16.6 EMC SOA Enterprise Assessment
  • 3.17 Envoy Technologies SOA Messaging
    • 3.17.1 Envoy Connect SOA Architecture
  • 3.18 Fiorano
    • 3.18.1 Fiorano SOA Platform®
    • 3.18.2 Fiorano SOA Platform® Components
    • 3.18.3 Fiorano® Business Components & Adapters
    • 3.18.4 Fiorano Pre-Built Services
    • 3.18.5 Fiorano® SOA Process Orchestration Tools
    • 3.18.6 Fiorano® Process Orchestration Tools
    • 3.18.7 Fiorano Event Process Orchestrator
    • 3.18.8 Fiorano Synthesizing Event-Driven Business Processes
    • 3.18.9 Fiorano Deploying Event-Processes
    • 3.18.10 Fiorano Dynamically Modifying And Changing Event-Processes
  • 3.19 Fujitsu SOA
    • 3.19.1 Fujitsu CentraSite SOA Governance
    • 3.19.2 Fujitsu Interstage Service Integrator
    • 3.19.3 Fujitsu SOA Positioning
  • 3.20 GXS
    • 3.20.1 Key SOA Products In The GXS Software Portfolio
    • 3.20.2 GXS SOA Translation Software
  • 3.21 SOA Software
    • 3.21.1 SOA Software Mainframe SOA Solution
    • 3.21.2 SOA Software SOLA Governance

4. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Technology

  • 4.1 Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Technology
  • 4.2 Web Service
    • 4.2.1 Web Services Software Components
    • 4.2.2 Installing the PHP Web Services Extensions
    • 4.2.3 Creating a SOAP Web Service
    • 4.2.4 Creating a SOAP Server
    • 4.2.5 Creating an XML-RPC Web Service
    • 4.2.6 IBM Rational Tester for SOA Quality
    • 4.2.7 IBM Rational Quality Manager
    • 4.2.8 IBM Rational Policy Tester
    • 4.2.9 IBM WebSphere® Datapower SOA Appliance
    • 4.2.10 IBM Rational Appscan®
  • 4.3 War Room SOA Diagnostics and Root-Cause Transaction Tracking Analysis
    • 4.3.1 Composite Application Managers for SOA
    • 4.3.2 SOA Metadata Federation
    • 4.3.3 Synchronizing Policy
    • 4.3.4 Service Metadata
  • 4.4 SOA Exception Management
    • 4.4.1 AmberPoint Exception Manager
  • 4.5 GSX Translation Software and Data Mapping
  • 4.6 SOA Infrastructure Technology
    • 4.6.1 Building a Robust Data Integration Layer
    • 4.6.2 Microsoft Internet Explorer RSS Functionality
    • 4.6.3 SOA Data Integration Layer Supports Developer Access To Metadata To Build Services
  • 4.7 State Machine
    • 4.7.1 SOA Network Strategy
    • 4.7.2 SOA Representational State Transfer Is A Mode Of Communication Accessible To Programs And Humans
  • 4.8 XDMS Technology
    • 4.8.1 Web Services and Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Tier Architecture
    • 4.8.2 TigerLogic FastSOA Architecture
    • 4.8.3 Registry SOA engine
  • 4.9 SOA Dynamic Architecture
    • 4.9.1 Google Search Engine Dynamic Architecture
    • 4.9.2 BigFiles
    • 4.9.3 Repository
    • 4.9.4 Microsoft .Net Defines Reusable Modules Dynamically
    • 4.9.5 Microsoft Combines Managed Modules into Assemblies
    • 4.9.6 Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
    • 4.9.7 IBM SOA Architecture is Dynamic for the Transport Layer
  • 4.10 Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
    • 4.10.1 SOA Technology Issues
    • 4.10.2 Technology Platforms
    • 4.10.3 Existing Enterprise Asset Automated Virtualization
    • 4.10.4 Complexity Of The Underlying IT Technologies
    • 4.10.5 Impact of Platforms
    • 4.10.6 Platforms and Disparate Technologies
  • 4.11 Services Oriented Applications (SOA) Services
    • 4.11.1 Application Integration Professional Services Implementation Strategies
    • 4.11.2 Application Connectivity
    • 4.11.3 Single Vendor Issues
    • 4.11.4 Standards Adoption
    • 4.11.5 SOA Technology Analysis
  • 4.12 SOA Business Benefits
  • 4.13 Business Events
    • 4.13.1 Event Transmission
    • 4.13.2 Business Process Automation
  • 4.14 Process Oriented Architecture
    • 4.14.1 Business Process Automation
    • 4.14.2 Business Process Management Modular Architecture
    • 4.14.3 Business Components
  • 4.15 Advanced E-Business Infrastructure
    • 4.15.1 Application Integration Technical Advantages
    • 4.15.2 Integration System Architecture
  • 4.16 Development Toolset
    • 4.16.1 Infrastructure And System Management
  • 4.17 Web Services
    • 4.17.1 Promise Of Web Services
    • 4.17.2 Java
    • 4.17.3 Java Technology
    • 4.17.4 J2EE
    • 4.17.5 Soap
    • 4.17.6 Apache Soap
    • 4.17.7 Load Balancer With SSL Support
    • 4.17.8 Points Of Failure
    • 4.17.9 Soap Limitations
    • 4.17.10 WSDL
    • 4.17.11 WSDL Service Descriptions
    • 4.17.12 UDDI
    • 4.17.13 UDDI Test Registries
    • 4.17.14 UDDI Distributed Web Service Discovery
    • 4.17.15 UDDI Consortium
    • 4.17.16 WS-Inspection Document Extensibility
    • 4.17.17 XML
    • 4.17.18 Metadata Repository
    • 4.17.19 Metadata Describes Location, Format, Relationships, Transformation, Rules, Cross-Reference
    • 4.17.20 Metadata Drives Creation Of Data Integration Services
    • 4.17.21 Wrappering
  • 4.18 Service Level Challenges
    • 4.18.1 Quality Of Service (QoS) Functions
    • 4.18.2 Network Efficiency
  • 4.19 Business Need
    • 4.19.1 Business Process Management Packaged Solutions for Rapid Deployment
    • 4.19.2 Quality Of Service Control
    • 4.19.3 XML Standards
  • 4.20 Oasis
  • 4.21 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • 4.21.1 IBM Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • 4.21.2 SOA Business Challenge IT Imperative
    • 4.21.3 Services Oriented Architecture And Relevant Standards
    • 4.21.4 XML Family Of Standards
    • 4.21.5 Integration Engines Leverage XML Processing
    • 4.21.6 XML Standards
    • 4.21.7 XML Role In Application Topology
    • 4.21.8 XML Meets The Integration Challenge
    • 4.21.9 XML Standard Communication Language
    • 4.21.10 Web Services Protocols
    • 4.21.11 Web Services Input And Output Formats
    • 4.21.12 Web Services Coupling Versus Cohesion
    • 4.21.13 Web Services Coupling
    • 4.21.14 Web Services Cohesion
  • 4.22 Open Systems
  • 4.23 Java
    • 4.23.1 AI Vendor Commitment To Java
    • 4.23.2 Advantages Of Java In Context Of Application Integration
  • 4.24 Web Services
  • 4.25 WS-Transaction and BPEL4WS Specifications
    • 4.25.1 WS-Reliable Messaging
    • 4.25.2 WS-Addressing
    • 4.25.3 Architecture for Reliable Messaging Delivery
  • 4.26 Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI)
  • 4.27 UDDI Registry
    • 4.27.1 UDDI Test Registries
    • 4.27.2 UDDI Distributed Web Service Discovery
    • 4.27.3 UDDI Consortium
    • 4.27.4 SOAP
    • 4.27.5 SOAP Framework
    • 4.27.6 SOAP Framework For Developing Web Services
    • 4.27.7 Apache SOAP
    • 4.27.8 Load balancer with SSL support
    • 4.27.9 Points Of Failure
    • 4.27.10 SOAP Limitations
    • 4.27.11 SOAP Protocol Uses Multi-Step Process
    • 4.27.12 Framework Benefits
    • 4.27.13 SOAP Test Strategies
    • 4.27.14 SOAP Solutions
  • 4.28 WSDL
    • 4.28.1 WSDL Service Descriptions
    • 4.28.2 WS-Inspection Document Extensibility
  • 4.29 OASIS
  • 4.30 IP Addressing And Directory Management
    • 4.30.1 Web Services Security Specification
    • 4.30.2 Components for Secure Web Services
  • 4.31 Web Services Technology
    • 4.31.1 Java Application Server
    • 4.31.2 Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs)
    • 4.31.3 Autonomic Computing Technologies
    • 4.31.4 Grid Protocol Topology
    • 4.31.5 Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA)
    • 4.31.6 Eclipse Open-Source Tools Framework
    • 4.31.7 Difficulties of Corba
    • 4.31.8 Distributed Object Computing Model
    • 4.31.9 Asynchronous Communications
  • 4.32 Stateless Session Bean
  • 4.33 Cluster
  • 4.34 Location Transparency
  • 4.35 Smart Proxy
  • 4.36 Load Balancing
  • 4.37 Process-Entity Design Pattern
  • 4.38 Command Objects / Control Flow
  • 4.39 Authorization Checks
  • 4.40 Delegation
  • 4.41 Collaborative Filtering
  • 4.42 Site Analysis
  • 4.43 Portals
    • 4.43.1 Real-Time Processing

5. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Company Profiles

  • 5.1 AmberPoint
    • 5.1.1 AmberPoint / SAP Ventures
    • 5.1.2 AmberPoint SOA JBoss Advanced Partner
  • 5.2 BMC
    • 5.2.1 BMC And Cisco Unified Computing Platform For Virtualized Environments
    • 5.2.2 BMC Customers
    • 5.2.3 BMC Customer Profile
    • 5.2.4 BMC Software Revenue
  • 5.3 Cisco
    • 5.3.1 Cisco / PostPath
    • 5.3.2 Cisco / Jabber
    • 5.3.3 Cisco Next-Gen Unified Communications
    • 5.3.4 Cisco Focus On Development Of Conferencing And Collaboration, Leveraging Expertise In The Network
    • 5.3.5 Cisco Revenue
    • 5.3.6 Cisco Acquisitions and Investments
    • 5.3.7 Cisco Innovation
    • 5.3.8 Cisco Customers
    • 5.3.9 Cisco Networking That Transforms How People Connect
  • 5.4 EMC
    • 5.4.1 EMC Acquisitions
    • 5.4.2 Selected EMC Partners
    • 5.4.3 Selected EMC Customers
    • 5.4.4 EMC Revenue
    • 5.4.5 EMC Segment Information
    • 5.4.6 EMC VMware Virtual Infrastructure
    • 5.4.7 EMC / Unisys and Expand Relationship in
    • 5.4.8 Enterprise Content Management
  • 5.5 Envoy Technologies
  • 5.6 Fiorano
    • 5.6.1 Fiorano Worldwide Market Presence
  • 5.7 Fujitsu
    • 5.7.1 Fujitsu OSS/NOS
    • 5.7.2 Fujitsu SOA
    • 5.7.3 Fujitsu CentraSite SOA Governance
  • 5.8 GXS
    • 5.8.1 GXS Acquired by Francisco Partners Operates As An Independent Firm
    • 5.8.2 GXS Customers
  • 5.9 Hewlett Packard (HP)
    • 5.9.1 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA
    • 5.9.2 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Solutions
    • 5.9.3 Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Systinet Governance
    • 5.9.4 HP Products and Services Segments
    • 5.9.5 Hewlett-Packard Technology Solutions Group
    • 5.9.6 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Storage and Servers
    • 5.9.7 Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Servers
    • 5.9.8 Hewlett-Packard Business Critical Systems
    • 5.9.10 Hewlett Packard Halo Telepresence Customers
    • 5.9.11 HP and Marriott
    • 5.9.12 HP and Tandberg
    • 5.9.13 Hewlett Packard Computer Industry Market Participant
    • 5.9.14 Hewlett Packard Global Provider Of Products
    • 5.9.15 HP Products and Services: Segment Information
    • 5.9.16 Hewlett Packard Technology Solutions Group
    • 5.9.17 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Storage and Servers
    • 5.9.18 HP and Tower Software
    • 5.9.19 Hewlett Packard Tower Software TRIM Context
  • 5.10 IBM
    • 5.10.1 IBM Strategic Priorities
    • 5.10.2 IBM Delivers Integration and Innovation to Clients
    • 5.10.3 IBM Business Model
    • 5.10.4 IBM Unified Communications In The Cloud Architecture
    • 5.10.5 IBM LotusLive Cloud-Based Portfolio Of Social Networking And Collaboration Services
    • 5.10.6 IBM Revenue
    • 5.10.7 IBM Software Capabilities
    • 5.10.8 IBM Systems and Technology Capabilities
    • 5.10.9 IBM Worldwide Organizations
    • 5.10.10 IBM Security
  • 5.11 Information Builders
    • 5.11.1 Information Builders Services and Support
    • 5.11.2 Information Builders iWay Software
    • 5.11.3 iWay Software
    • 5.11.4 Genesis of iWay Software
  • 5.12 Microsoft
    • 5.12.1 Microsoft Revenue
    • 5.12.2 Microsoft Client Revenue
    • 5.12.3 Microsoft Server and Tools Revenue
    • 5.12.4 Microsoft Online Services Business Revenue
    • 5.12.5 Microsoft Business Division Revenue
    • 5.12.6 Microsoft Entertainment and Devices Division
    • 5.12.7 Microsoft Segment Revenue
    • 5.12.8 Microsoft Competition
    • 5.12.9 Microsoft Security Vulnerabilities
    • 5.12.10 Microsoft Client Segment
    • 5.12.11 Microsoft Segments
    • 5.12.12 Open Text Livelink ECM Integration Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
    • 5.12.13 Microsoft Multinational Computer Technology
    • 5.12.14 Selected Microsoft Partners
    • 5.12.15 Microsoft Financials
    • 5.12.16 Microsoft Software Products
  • 5.13 MQSoftware
    • 5.13.1 MQSoftware Q Nami!
    • 5.13.2 MQSoftware Customers
    • 5.13.3 MQSoftware Services
    • 5.13.4 Partnerships
  • 5.14 Oracle
    • 5.14.1 Oracle Software Business
    • 5.14.2 Oracle Competition In The Software Business
    • 5.14.3 Oracle Software License Updates and Product Support
    • 5.14.4 Oracle Software Description
    • 5.14.5 Oracle / BEA Systems
    • 5.14.6 Oracle Software Revenue by Region
    • 5.14.7 Oracle Corporate Strategy Active Acquisition Program
  • 5.15 Progress Software
    • 5.15.1 Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Products
    • 5.15.2 Progress Application Platform Products
    • 5.15.3 Progress Software Data Infrastructure Products
    • 5.15.4 Progress Software Customers
    • 5.15.5 Progress Software / DataDirect Technologies
  • 5.16 Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform
    • 5.16.1 JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform Partners
  • 5.17 SeeWhy
  • 5.18 SOA Software
  • 5.19 Software AG
    • 5.19.1 Software AG Respected Customers in Key Industries
    • 5.19.2 Software AG Technologies Offered
    • 5.19.3 Software AG webMethods Business Division
    • 5.19.4 Software AG Geographical Expansion
    • 5.19.5 Software AG Customers
    • 5.19.6 Software AG Corporate Social Responsibility
    • 5.19.7 Software AG Customers
    • 5.19.8 Software AG Revenue
    • 5.19.9 Software AG Highlights in 2008
  • 5.20 Tibco
    • 5.20.1 Tibco SOA
    • 5.20.2 Tibco Business optimization
    • 5.20.3 Tibco BPM
    • 5.20.4 Tibco Professional Services
    • 5.20.5 Tibco Competition
    • 5.20.6 Tibco Revenue
  • 5.21 Vitria Technology
  • 5.22 Workday
    • 5.22.1 Workday / Cape Clear
    • 5.22.2 Workday Customers

List of Tables and Figures
  • Table ES-1
    • Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Benefits
  • Table ES-2
    • Services Oriented Architecture SOA Market Driving Forces
  • Table ES-3
    • SOA Infrastructure Market Shares, 2008
  • Table ES-4
    • SOA Market Shares, 2008
  • Figure ES-5
    • Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Forecasts, 2008-2015
  • Table 1-1
    • Typical Problems Encountered By Enterprise Implementing SOA
  • Table 1-2
    • SOA Management Issues
  • Table 1-3
    • SOA User- Focused Security Layer
  • Table 1-4
    • SOA Services Process
  • Table 1-5
    • Using SOA To Facilitate Integration Beyond The Enterprise Network
  • Table 1-6
    • SOA Agile Business Functions
  • Table 1-7
    • SOA Agile Business Benefits
  • Table 1-8
    • Key SOA Data and Metadata Components
  • Table 1-9
    • SOA Return on Investment (ROI)
  • Table 1-10
    • Process Of SOA Implementation Depends On N-Dimensional Interaction Of Layers That Can Be Modeled by Business Analyst
  • Table 1-11
    • IBM SOA Business I Services Layers
  • Figure 1-12
    • IBM Smart SOA Continuum
  • Table 1-13
    • IBM SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
  • Table 1-14
    • Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
  • Table 1-15
    • IT Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
  • Table 1-16
    • Dramatic Increase in Business Activity Speed Drives SOA
  • Table 1-17
    • Business Aspects of Change Response Creating Need for SOA
  • Table 1-17 (Continued)
    • Business Aspects of Change Response Creating Need for SOA
  • Table 1-18
    • SOA Engine Manages Information Access To Create A Service
  • Table 1-19
    • Services Oriented Architecture Achieves Flexible Infrastructure
  • Table 1-19 (Continued)
    • Services Oriented Architecture Achieve Flexible Infrastructure
  • Table 1-20
    • Services Oriented Architecture Line Of Business Positioning
  • Table 1-21
    • Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Efficiency
  • Table 1-22
    • Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Challenges
  • Table 1-22 (Continued)
    • Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Challenges
  • Table 1-23
    • Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Risk Management
  • Table 1-24
    • Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Improvements
  • Table 2-1
    • Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Benefits
  • Table 2-2
    • Services Oriented Architecture SOA Market Driving Forces
  • Table 2-3
    • SOA Market Shares, 2008
  • Table 2-4
    • SOA Market Shares, 2008
  • Figure 2-5
    • Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Forecasts, 2008-2015
  • Table 2-6
    • Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Market Forecasts, 2008-2015
  • Table 2-7
    • SOA Market Driving Forces For Real Time Computing
  • Table 2-7 (Continued)
    • SOA Market Driving Forces For Real Time Computing
  • Table 2-8
    • Typical SOA Integration Projects
  • Table 2-9
    • Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Industry Market Segments, 2008
  • Table 2-10
    • Worldwide SOA Infrastructure Revenue Industry Market Segments, 2008
  • Table 2-11
    • Worldwide SOA Infrastructure Revenue Software Market Segments, 2008
  • Table 2-12
    • Worldwide SOA Infrastructure Revenue Market Software Segments, 2008
  • Figure 2-13
    • Worldwide Component Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2015
  • Table 2-14
    • Worldwide Component Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2008-2015
  • Table 2-15
    • SOA Competitive Market Factors
  • Table 2-16
    • Network Business Integration (BI)
  • Table 2-16 (Continued)
    • Network Business Integration (BI)
  • Table 2-17
    • Internet Impact On SOA
  • Table 2-17 (Continued)
    • Internet Impact On SOA
  • Table 2-18
    • Impact of Application Connectivity On E-Business
  • Table 2-18 (Continued)
    • Impact of Application Connectivity On E-Business
  • Table 2-19
    • SOA Business Environment Market Drivers
  • Figure 2-20
    • Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Regional Market Shares, 2008
  • Table 2-21
    • Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Regional Market Shares, 2008
  • Figure 2-22
    • Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) European Regional Market Segments, 2008
  • Table 2-23
    • Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) European Regional Market Shares, 2008
  • Table 2-24
    • Business Benefits Of SOA
  • Table 2-25
    • Integration Modular Architecture Impact
  • Table 2-26
    • Enterprise Back End System Advantages From SOA
  • Table 2-27
    • Enterprise Market Advantages From SOA
  • Table 2-28
    • Integration Targeted To B2B And Exchanges
  • Table 2-29
    • Business Process Integration Advantages
  • Table 2-30
    • Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Processes
  • Table 2-31
    • E-Business Objectives
  • Table 2-32
    • Electronic Commerce Infrastructure Requirements
  • Table 2-33
    • SOA Functions Enable E-commerce
  • Table 2-34
    • SOA Support For Internet Commerce And EDI
  • Table 2-35
    • Key Challenges Of Application Integration
  • Table 3-1
    • SOA Leveraging of Business Integration Systems
  • Table 3-2
    • SOA Engine Segments
  • Table 3-3
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Features
  • Table 3-4
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry Product Framework
  • Table 3-5
    • IBM WebSphere Service SOA Registry Product Functions
  • Table 3-6
    • IBM SOA Rational Asset Manager Functions
  • Table 3-7
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry And Repository Advanced Lifecycle Product Features
  • Table 3-8
    • IBM WebSphere SOA Functions
  • Table 3-9
    • IBM WebSphere SOA Service Registry and Repository Foundation
  • Table 3-10
    • IBM WebSphere SOA Service Registry and Repository Search Characteristics
  • Table 3-11
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository Functions
  • Table 3-12
    • IBM WebSphere enables SOA Governance In The Service Life Cycle Features
  • Table 3-13
    • IBM WebSphere SOA Governance policies Components
  • Table 3-14
    • IBM WebSphere SOA Policy Management
  • Table 3-15
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository As A Critical Deployment Component Of SOA Projects
  • Table 3-15 (Continued)
    • WebSphere Service Registry and Repository As A Critical Deployment Component Of SOA Projects
  • Table 3-15 (Continued)
    • WebSphere Service Registry and Repository As A Critical Deployment Component Of SOA Projects
  • Table 3-16
    • IBM WebSphere Service Modeling
  • Table 3-16 (Continued)
    • IBM WebSphere Service Modeling
  • Table 3-17
    • IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository SOA Product Positioning
  • Table 3-18
    • IBM SOA Framework Components
  • Table 3-19
    • Function of IBM SOA Governance
  • Table 3-20
    • IBM® SOA Identification of Areas For Improved Governance
  • Table 3-21
    • IBM SOA Governance Decisions:
  • Table 3-22
    • IBM SOA Governance
  • Table 3-23
    • IBM SOA Governance Actions
  • Table 3-24
    • IBM SOA Federated Policy Approach
  • Table 3-25
    • IBM SOA Governance
  • Figure 3-26
    • IBM SOA Policy Approach Strategy
  • Table 3-27
    • IBM SOA Governance Model
  • Table 3-28
    • IBM SOA Governance Assembly
  • Table 3-29
    • IBM SOA Governance Deployment
  • Table 3-30
    • IBM SOA Governance Management
  • Table 3-31
    • SOA Governance Key Components
  • Table 3-32
    • IBM SOA Governance Key Components
  • Table 3-33
    • IBM Key Phases of SOA Governance
  • Table 3-34
    • IBM SOA Governance Enabling Tools
  • Table 3-35
    • IBM Solutions Phases Of The Service Lifecycle Model and Assembly
  • Table 3-36
    • IBM Rational Solutions Phases Of The Service Lifecycle Model and Assembly
  • Table 3-37
    • IBM Rational Solutions Deployment of Service Lifecycle Models and Assembly
  • Table 3-38
    • IBM Rational Solutions Management of Service Lifecycle Models and Assembly
  • Table 3-39
    • IBM SOA Product Framework Positioning
  • Table 3-40
    • IBM® Rational® ClearCase® Functions
  • Table 3-41
    • IBM® Rational® ClearQuest Functions
  • Table 3-42
    • IBM Tivoli® Composite Application Manager
  • Table 3-43
    • Components of Tibco Composition Approach To Services Oriented Architecture SOA
  • Table 3-44
    • Tibco SOA Services Building Platform Components
  • Table 3-45
    • Tibco Service Composition And Service Virtualization Components
  • Table 3-46
    • Tibco Web Service Composition
  • Table 3-47
    • Tibco SOA positioning
  • Table 3-48
    • Tibco ActiveMatrix Functions
  • Table 3-49
    • Tibco SOA Tools Labor Properties
  • Table 3-50
    • Tibco Primary Value Of SOA
  • Table 3-51
    • Tibco EDA Messaging Characteristics:
  • Figure 3-52
    • Tibco Continuum of Mainframe Integration Requirements
  • Figure 3-53
    • Tibco SOA Mainframe Service Suite
  • Figure 3-54
    • Interactions of Tibco Mainframe SOA Services Suite
  • Table 3-55
    • Tibco Domain Specific SOA Suites
  • Table 3-56
    • Tibco Rendezvous Low Latency Messaging Functions
  • Table 3-57
    • Tibco Rendezvous Low Latency Messaging Key Features
  • Table 3-58
    • Microsoft BizTalk Server and Enterprise Service Bus
  • Table 3-59
    • Microsoft BizTalk Services Visual Studio Team
  • Table 3-60
    • Microsoft Dynamics BizTalk SOA Server Key Benefits
  • Table 3-61
    • Microsoft Office Visio Key Benefits
  • Figure 3-62
    • Microsoft ESB Interconnectivity Architecture
  • Table 3-63
    • Microsoft ESB BizTalk Server
  • Table 3-64
    • Microsoft ESB Technical Features:
  • Table 3-65
    • Microsoft ESB System Requirements
  • Table 3-66
    • Microsoft ESB SOA Interoperating Components
  • Figure 3-67
    • Schematic View Of The Core Microsoft BizTalk System Components (ff)
  • Table 3-68
    • Microsoft SOA ESB Capabilities
  • Table 3-69
    • Microsoft ESBSOA Architectural Guidance
  • Table 3-70
    • Microsoft Managed Services Engine Functions
  • Table 3-71
    • Microsoft Enterprise Clearly Defined UDDI Services Infrastructure Benefits
  • Table 3-72
    • Oracle Integrated, Best-In-Class SOA Technology Functions
  • Table 3-73
    • Oracle SOA Suite Benefits
  • Table 3-74
    • Oracle Fusion Middleware Core Design Principles
  • Table 3-75
    • Oracle / BEA SOA Application Integration Architecture Functions
  • Table 3-76
    • webMethods Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Suite Functions
  • Table 3-77
    • Software AG webMethods SOA Positioning
  • Figure 3-78
    • Software AG webMethods SOA Suite Enterprise Service Bus
  • Table 3-79
    • Software AG webMethods Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Key Features
  • Table 3-80
    • Software AG webMethods SOA Governance CentraSite Key Benefits
  • Figure 3-81
    • Software AG webMethods Single Governance SOA
  • Table 3-82
    • Software AG webMethods CentraSite SOA Governance Support for Achieving Business Results Faster
  • Figure 3-83
    • Software AG webMethods CentraSite SOA Governance Positioning
  • Table 3-84
    • Software AG' s webMethods SOA Product Suite Benefits
  • Figure 3-85
    • Progress Software SOA Portfolio
  • Table 3-86
    • Progress SOA Portfolio Integration Partners
  • Table 3-87
    • Progress Sonic ESB Product Family
  • Table 3-88
    • HP SOA Systinet Features
  • Table 3-89
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Quality Management Solutions Capabilities
  • Table 3-90
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Quality Management Solutions Integration Capabilities
  • Table 3-91
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) Diagnostics for SOA Capabilities
  • Table 3-92
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Policy Enforcer Solutions Integration Capabilities
  • Table 3-93
    • HP Quality Management Ecosystem
  • Table 3-94
    • HP SOA Key Features
  • Table 3-95
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and AdaptersHTC/Viewlink
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-95 (Continued)
    • Hewlett Packard (HP) SOA Partners and Adapters
  • Table 3-96
    • SAP Services for SOA
  • Table 3-96 (Continued)
    • SAP Services for SOA
  • Table 3-96 (Continued)
    • SAP Services for SOA
  • Table 3-97
    • SAP End-to-End SOA Planning Services
  • Table 3-98
    • SAP SOA Evaluation Services
  • Table 3-99
    • SAP SOA Implementation Services
  • Table 3-99 (Continued)
    • SAP SOA Implementation Services
  • Table 3-100
    • SAP SOA Implementation Services
  • Table 3-101
    • SAP SOA Governance Services
  • Table 3-102
    • SAP SOA Education Offerings
  • Table 3-103
    • SAP SOA Discovery System Benefits
  • Table 3-104
    • SAP SOA Services For Evaluating And Reducing Implementation Cycle
  • Table 3-105
    • Sun' s Approach To SOA Business Integration
  • Table 3-106
    • Sun SOA Java Composite Application Platform Suite Approach Key Benefits
  • Table 3-107
    • Sun SOA Java Composite Application Platform Suite Support for Business Flexibility
  • Table 3-108
    • Sun SOA Java Composite Application Platform Suite Uses to Gain Business Efficiency
  • Table 3-109
    • AmberPoint Runtime Governance Of SOA Management Challenges Addressed
  • Table 3-110
    • AmberPoint Abstracting the Management Layer
  • Table 3-111
    • AmberPoint SOA Service-Enabling Strategy
  • Table 3-112
    • AmberPoint Service Catalog Functions to Promote SOA Component Reuse
  • Table 3-113
    • AmberPoint SOA Management System Functions
  • Table 3-114
    • AmberPoint Service and Infrastructure Discovery
  • Table 3-115
    • AmberPoint Visualization Of The Logical And The Physical Service Network
  • Table 3-116
    • AmberPoint Runtime Governance Solutions
  • Table 3-117
    • AmberPoint Policy-Based Approach Functions:
  • Table 3-118
    • AmberPoint Policy Management
  • Table 3-119
    • AmberPoint Extensible Policy Library
  • Table 3-120
    • AmberPoint Automatic Policy Provisioning
  • Table 3-121
    • AmberPoint Distributed Architecture
  • Table 3-122
    • AmberPoint Policy-based Management Capabilities
  • Table 3-123
    • AmberPoint Message Security
  • Table 3-124
    • AmberPoint Access Control
  • Table 3-125
    • AmberPoint Trust and Credential Mediation
  • Table 3-126
    • AmberPoint Version Management
  • Table 3-127
    • AmberPoint Service Virtualization
  • Table 3-128
    • AmberPoint Message Brokering
  • Table 3-129
    • AmberPoint Custom Policies
  • Table 3-130
    • AmberPoint Policy Enforcement Architecture Functions
  • Table 3-131
    • AmberPoint Leveraging the Infrastructure
  • Table 3-132
    • AmberPoint SOA Services
  • Table 3-133
    • Amberpoint SOA Security
  • Table 3-134
    • Amberpoint SOA Security Features
  • Table 3-135
    • Amberpoint SOA Content and Context Awareness
  • Table 3-136
    • Amberpoint SOA Message Security
  • Table 3-137
    • Amberpoint SOA Authentication and Access Control
  • Table 3-138
    • Amberpoint SOA Federation
  • Table 3-139
    • AmberPoint SOA System Security
  • Table 3-140
    • AmberPoint Integrates With Existing Security Infrastructure
  • Table 3-141
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management
  • Table 3-142
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management To Define and Differentiate SOA Services
  • Table 3-143
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management to Measure and Evaluate SOA
  • Table 3-144
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management Alert and Pro-actively Remediate SOA Issues
  • Table 3-145
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management Analyze and Predict SOA Activity
  • Table 3-146
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management of Interactions Across SOA Services and Business Transactions
  • Table 3-147
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management Analysis and Prioritization
  • Table 3-148
    • AmberPoint Service Level Management Customizable UI
  • Table 3-149
    • AttachmateWRQ Synchronizing Data Across Multiple Applications
  • Figure 3-150
    • BMC SOA / Web Services Management
  • Table 3-151
    • Cape Clear SOA Support For Multiple Versions Of Web Service
  • Table 3-152
    • Cape Clear SOA Services Message Compatibility Issues
  • Table 3-153
    • EMC SOA Measurable Outcomes
  • Table 3-154
    • EMC SOA Enterprise Assessment Goals
  • Table 3-155
    • EMC types of SOA Methodologies
  • Table 3-156
    • Fiorano Adapters High Level Categories :
  • Table 3-157
    • Fiorano Adapters
  • Table 3-158
    • Fiorano Event Process Orchestrator Functions
  • Figure 3-159
    • Fiorano Event Process Orchestrator: Composing Event- Driven Business Processes
  • Table 3-160
    • Fujitsu CentraSite SOA product suite Features
  • Table 3-161
    • Fujitsu CentraSite SOA Management Information
  • Table 3-162
    • Fujitsu Interstage Service Integrator Functions
  • Table 3-163
    • Fujitsu Interstage Service Transport Functions
  • Table 3-164
    • Fujitsu SOA Positioning
  • Table 3-165
    • Fujitsu SOA Application Development Cycle Manager
  • Table 3-166
    • GXS Trading Grid Enterprise Service Bus Benefits
  • Table 3-167
    • GXS Trading Grid Enterprise Service Bus Benefits
  • Table 3-168
    • GXS Trading Grid Business Services APIs Positioning
  • Table 3-168 (Continued)
    • GXS Trading Grid Business Services APIs Positioning
  • Figure 3-169
    • GSX Technology Service Oriented Network For High Performance B2B
  • Table 3-170
    • GXS SOA Translation Software
  • Table 3-171
    • SOA Software Portfolio Manager Features
  • Table 3-172
    • SOA Software SOLA Studio
  • Table 3-173
    • SOA Software SOLA Advantages for Mainframe SOA
  • Table 3-174
    • SOA Software SOLA and IBM' s CICS TSv3.x
  • Table 4-1
    • Web Service Components
  • Table 4-2
    • SOAP Functions
  • Table 4-3
    • WSDL elements
  • Table 4-4
    • IBM Rational SOA Quality Tester Functions
  • Table 4-5
    • IBM Rational SOA Performance And Scalability Quality Tester Functions
  • Table 4-6
    • IBM Rational SOA Life CycleTester Functions
  • Table 4-6 (Continued)
    • IBM Rational SOA Life CycleTester Functions
  • Table 4-7
    • SOA Composite Application Manager Functions
  • Table 4-8
    • SOA Composite Application Manager Comprehensive Indexing And Search Functions
  • Table 4-9
    • SOA Composite Application Manager Comprehensive Real-time, Proactive Control over Logging Functions
  • Table 4-10
    • SOA Validation Capabilities
  • Table 4-11
    • AmberPoint SOA Exception Management Functions
  • Table 4-12
    • AmberPoint SOA Exception Analysis and Prioritization
  • Table 4-13
    • AmberPoint SOA Handle Exceptions of Every Type
  • Table 4-14
    • AmberPoint SOA Multi-Mode Exception Response
  • Table 4-15
    • AmberPoint SOA BENEFITS
  • Table 4-16
    • GXS Application Integrator Functions
  • Table 4-17
    • SOA Metadata Comprises Data Integration Layer
  • Table 4-18
    • SOA Metadata Data Integration Layer Functions
  • Table 4-18 (Continued)
    • SOA Metadata Data Integration Layer Functions
  • Table 4-19
    • TigerLogic XDMS Architecture
  • Table 4-20
    • Web Services and SOA Tier Architecture
  • Figure 4-21
    • TigerLogic XDMS Multi-Schema Engine Architecture
  • Figure 4-22
    • TigerLogic XDMS -SOA Engine Architecture
  • Table 4-23
    • WebMethods SOA Registry Engine
  • Table 4-24
    • Google Dynamic Architecture
  • Figure 4-25
    • Microsoft.Net Dynamic Definition of Reusable Modules
  • Figure 4-26
    • Microsoft.NET Compiling Source Code into Managed Assemblies
  • Figure 4-27
    • Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
  • Table 4-28
    • Process Of SOA Implementation Depends On N-Dimensional Interaction Of Layers That Can Be Modeled by Business Analyst
  • Table 4-29
    • IBM SOA Business I Services Layers
  • Figure 4-30
    • IBM Smart SOA Continuum
  • Table 4-31
    • SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
  • Table 4-32
    • Type Of Event Information
  • Table 4-33
    • Event Management Definition
  • Table 4-34
    • Integration Services
  • Table 4-34 (Continued)
    • Integration Services
  • Table 4-35
    • Business Components Chained Together To Comprise A Business Service
  • Table 4-36
    • Integration Services
  • Table 4-36 (Continued)
    • Integration Services
  • Table 4-37
    • Design Concerns For Integration System Architecture
  • Table 4-38
    • Soap-Based Web Service Production Environment Testing
  • Table 4-39
    • Metadata Repository
  • Table 4-40
    • SOA Metadata Functions
  • Table 4-41
    • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Functions
  • Table 4-41 (Continued)
    • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Functions
  • Table 4-42
    • Integration Engine XML Processing Functions That Drive Business Process Electronically End-To-End
  • Table 4-42 (Continued)
    • Integration Engine XML Processing Functions That Drive Business Process Electronically End-To-End
  • Table 4-42 (Continued)
    • Integration Engine XML Processing Functions That Drive Business Process Electronically End-To-End
  • Table 4-43
    • Web Services Input Formats
  • Table 4-44
    • Web Services Output Formats
  • Table 4-45
    • Web Services Protocols
  • Table 4-46
    • Companies Driving Web Services
  • Table 4-47
    • SOAP-Based Web Service Production Environment Testing
  • Table 4-48
    • Functions Of An IP Addressing Device
  • Table 4-49
    • Benefits Of an IP Addressing Device
  • Table 4-50
    • Application Server Underlying Infrastructure Services
  • Table 4-51
    • Major Types Of Enterprise Beans
  • Table 4-51 (Continued)
    • Major Types Of Enterprise Beans
  • Table 4-52
    • Autonomic Features
  • Table 4-52 (Continued)
    • Autonomic Features
  • Table 4-53
    • Autonomic Functions
  • Table 4-53 (Continued)
    • Autonomic Functions
  • Table 4-54
    • Distributed Transaction Functions
  • Table 4-55
    • Portal Functions B2B Application Server Quantifiable Business Benefit
  • Table 4-57
    • Trading Exchange Positioning
  • Table 4-58
    • Integrated e-Market Benefits
  • Table 5-1
    • AmberPoint Partnerships With SOA Platform Vendors
  • Table 5-2
    • BMC Software and Cisco Computing Platform Functions
  • Table 5-3
    • EMC VMWare Virtual Infrastructure Business Revenue Growth Positioning
  • Table 5-4
    • Envoy Connect Functions
  • Table 5-5
    • Fujitsu CentraSite SOA product suite Features
  • Table 5-6
    • Fujitsu CentraSite SOA Management Information
  • Table 5-7
    • GXS Range Of Outsourced EDI And Supply Chain Management Solutions Functions
  • Table 5-8
    • Hewlett Packard Product and Services Positioning
  • Table 5-9
    • Hewlett Packard Global Positioning
  • Table 5-10
    • Hewlett Packard Tower Software Global, Vertical Markets
  • Table 5-11
    • Hewlett Packard Tower Software Global, Reducing Risk During Litigation
  • Table 5-12
    • Hewlett Packard Tower Software Microsoft OfficeR Documents
  • Table 5-13
    • Hewlett Packard Tower TRIM Context Features Overview
  • Table 5-14
    • IBM Strategic Priorities
  • Table 5-15
    • Information Builders Positioning
  • Figure 5-16
    • Information Builders Worldwide Offices
  • Table 5-17
    • Microsoft Response to Security Vulnerabilities
  • Table 5-18
    • Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Features
  • Table 5-18 (Continied)
    • Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Features
  • Table 5-19
    • Progress Software Application Platform Product Features
  • Table 5-19 (Continued)
    • Progress Software Application Platform Product Features
  • Table 5-20
    • Progress Software DataXtend Data Infrastructure Products
  • Table 5-21
    • Progress Software DataDirect Data Infrastructure Products
  • Table 5-22
    • JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform Functions
  • Table 5-23
    • Red Hat' s JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform Positioning
Back to Top