Cover Image
Market Research Report

Agrow Pesticides Integrated Pest Management

Published by AGROW Product code 657080
Published Content info 78 Pages
Delivery time: 1-2 business days
Price
Back to Top
Agrow Pesticides Integrated Pest Management
Published: June 5, 2018 Content info: 78 Pages
Description

‘Agrow Pesticides Integrated Pest Management’ report explores how integrated pest management (IPM) policies and strategies are being implemented across different countries and regions.

It also discusses the drivers and barriers to IPM adoption and the pesticides used. Detailed within are government IPM policies, the companies actively involved in the IPM segment, and the trends in R&D.

Table of Contents
Product Code: 89856

Table of Contents

Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

  • 1.1. Drivers of IPM
  • 1.2. Designing a package of IPM measures
    • 1.2.1. Understanding pest and host biology
    • 1.2.2. Establishing an action threshold
    • 1.2.3. Developing a set of recommended measures
      • Preventative cultural measures
      • Biological crop protection
      • Habitat manipulation
  • 1.3. Implementing an IPM package
    • 1.3.1. Damage and pest identification
    • 1.3.2. Scouting
    • 1.3.3. Implementing measures
    • 1.3.4. Evaluation and recording of results
  • 1.4. Assessing the impacts of IPM

Chapter 2: Biological crop protection

  • 2.1. Types of biological crop protection
    • 2.1.1. Beneficial insects
    • 2.1.2. Microbial
      • Bacteria
      • Fungi
      • Viruses
      • Nematodes
    • 2.1.3. Natural products
      • Neem oil (Azadirachtin)
      • Pyrethrum extract
      • Other commercial natural products
    • 2.1.4. Semiochemicals

Chapter 3: Chemicals and IPM

  • 3.1. Chemical use in IPM
  • 3.2. Spray timing
  • 3.3. Selective chemicals used in IPM
    • Imidacloprid
    • Esfenvalerate
    • Pirimicarb
    • Indoxacarb
    • Diflubenzuron
    • Pymetrozine
    • Buprofezin
    • Cyromazine
    • Methoxyfenozide
    • Chlorantraniliprole
    • Other selective chemicals
  • 3.4. Basic substances
    • Chitosan hydrochloride
    • Clayed charcoal
    • Calcium hydroxide
    • Diammonium phosphate
    • Fructose
    • Hydrogen peroxide
    • Beer

Chapter 4: Policy and adoption

  • 4.1. Policies by country
    • 4.1.1. North America
      • USA
      • Canada
    • 4.1.2. Europe
      • UK
      • Bulgaria
      • Croatia
      • Cyprus
    • 4.1.3. Near East
      • Iran
      • Turkey
      • Jordan
    • 4.1.4. Asia and Africa
      • Farmer Field Schools
      • Indonesia
      • India
      • China
      • Nepal
      • West Africa
    • 4.1.5. Communication, diffusion and adoption

Chapter 5: The IPM industry

  • 5.1.1. The biological crop protection industry
    • Microbial manufacturers
    • Beneficial insects
    • Natural products
    • Semiochemicals
  • 5.1.2. Involvement of the agrochemical majors
    • Syngenta
    • Bayer

Chapter 6: Bertha armyworm in US Canola

  • The IPM response

Chapter 7: Wheat in Tajikistan

  • Pest problems
  • The IPM response
  • Impact assessment

Chapter 8: Aubergine and gourd in Bangladesh

  • Pest problems
  • The IPM response
  • Impact assessment
  • Adoption

Chapter 9: Mango in Kenya

  • Pest problems
  • IPM response
  • Impact assessment

Chapter 10: The future of IPM

  • 10.1. Fieldwork-based actions
  • 10.2. Technology-based actions

Chapter 11: Summary

Chapter 12: Annex

  • 12.1. Acronyms
  • 12.2. Tobacco and IPM
  • 12.3. Sugarcane in Pakistan
  • 12.4. Push-pull biological control used in IPM
  • 12.5. Data tables on biologicals

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Cases of aphid chemical resistance, 1996 - 2016
  • Figure 2: The economic injury level concept (EIL)
  • Figure 3: Equation for calculating an EIL
  • Figure 4: The action threshold (AT)
  • Figure 5: The IPM Pyramid showing available measures and their compatibility
  • Figure 6: Examples of intercropping
  • Figure 7: Placing of water-sensitive paper on plants
  • Figure 8: Examples of good water coverage, excessive run-off and non-uniform coverage
  • Figure 9: Response of predator densities in a soybean field with surrounding vegetation
  • Figure 10: Effect of beetle banks on beetle populations in cropping systems
  • Figure 11: Diagram of bio-bed layers (tobacco)
  • Figure 12: Example scouting patterns
  • Figure 13: Scouting timings of pests in blueberry
  • Figure 14: Depiction of economic threshold in practical terms
  • Figure 15: Global biological CP market ($ million, 2010-2016)
  • Figure 16: Examples of parasitoid beneficial insects
  • Figure 17: Effect of Sericothrips release (number) on Ulex europaeus control (%)
  • Figure 18: "Tricho cards" used to release Trichogramma insects
  • Figure 19: The effect of Beauveria bassiana insecticide on European corn borer
  • Figure 20: Chrysanthemum harvest used for extraction of pyrethrum
  • Figure 21: Toxicity of natural product insecticides on whitefly (% mortality)
  • Figure 22: Pheromone traps and pheromone disruption
  • Figure 23: Optimal timing of spray applications in IPM
  • Figure 24: Results of IPM survey in Jordan (%)
  • Figure 25: A typical Farmer Field School
  • Figure 26: IPM awareness training for schoolchildren in India
  • Figure 27: Net income on Chinese cotton production with and without IPM
  • Figure 28: Suggested use of methods and media for the diffusion of IPM
  • Figure 29: Extension meeting in Nepal, 2002
  • Figure 30: Continuum from conventional pest control to IPM
  • Figure 31: Bertha armyworm life stages
  • Figure 32: Unitrap to monitor bertha armyworm
  • Figure 33: A Sunn pest on wheatcorn
  • Figure 34: IPM impact on wheat yield (kg/plot)
  • Figure 35: Main aubergine growing districts in Bangladesh (million tonnes)
  • Figure 36: Eggplant fruit and shoot borer (EFSB) growth stages
  • Figure 37: Aubergine damage caused by eggplant fruit and shoot borer (EFSB)
  • Figure 38: Reported cases of Lepidoptera Pyralidae chemical resistance each year
  • Figure 39: A EFSB sex pheromone-kept aubergine field showing correct height
  • Figure 40: Pheromone trap spacing in a gourd field
  • Figure 41: Percentage change in production costs and profitability (IPM, Bangladesh)
  • Figure 42: Functions of the Augmentorium
  • Figure 43: Mango revenue less cost of input (Ksh/acre)
  • Figure 44: Push-pull strategies

List of Tables

  • Table 1: US crop losses from insects (%)
  • Table 2: Definitions of measurable IPM impacts (International Potato Centre)
  • Table 3: IPM systems recommending use of imidacloprid
  • Table 4: IPM systems recommending use of esfenvalerate
  • Table 5: IPM systems recommending use of pirimicarb
  • Table 6: IPM systems recommending use of indoxacarb
  • Table 7: IPM systems recommending use of diflubenzuron
  • Table 8: IPM systems recommending use of pymetrozine
  • Table 9: IPM systems recommending use of buprofezin
  • Table 10: IPM systems recommending use of cyromazine
  • Table 11: IPM systems recommending use of methoxyfenozide
  • Table 12: IPM systems recommending use of chlorantraniliprole
  • Table 13: Measures used by IPM farmers (USA)
  • Table 14: DAFF (Canada) IPM projects 2017
  • Table 15: Available IPM guides in Bulgaria
  • Table 16: Countries involved in FAO programme GTFS/REM/070/ITA
  • Table 17: Frequencies of obstacles to IPM adoption in developing countries
  • Table 18: M&A activity in the biopesticide industry (2010-2017)
  • Table 19: Source countries of beneficial insects imported to India
  • Table 20: Bayer products
  • Table 21: EILs for bertha armyworm in canola
  • Table 22: Recommended IPM measures developed for bertha armyworm in Canola (USA)
  • Table 23: IPM measures explored for wheat (Tajikistan)
  • Table 24: Recommended IPM measures developed for EFSB in Aubergine (Bangladesh)
  • Table 25: Recommended IPM measures developed in mango (Kenya)
  • Table 26: Acronyms
  • Table 27: Economic thresholds for key tobacco insect pests
  • Table 28: Yield losses from important sugarcane insect pests
  • Table 29: Recommended IPM measures developed for sugarcane (Pakistan)
  • Table 30: Economics of biological crop protection
  • Table 31: Instructions on release of beneficial insects
Back to Top