PUBLISHER: Coherent Market Insights | PRODUCT CODE: 1084336
PUBLISHER: Coherent Market Insights | PRODUCT CODE: 1084336
The pressure bandages are used to deliberately apply pressure to produce a desired clinical effect after trauma. Pressure bandages, also known as compression bandages, pressure dressing, are used to control edema, lymphedema and reduce swelling in the treatment of venous disorders of the leg. They also can be easily adjusted to fit changing limb size and compression needs. The pressure bandage are highly recommended in the medical settings, owing to the wide availability of options such as the difference in compression pressure allowing efficient treatment for severe to acute injuries.
The major factors driving growth of the pressure bandages market include rising geriatric population, rising surgical cases, and increasing incidence of chronic wounds. According to the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 2021, the prevalence of leg ulceration is approximately one to two percent higher in the older adult population with a peak prevalence is between 60-80 years. Moreover, the rising adoption of pressure bandages in ambulatory surgical centers and home care settings due to easy usage contributes to the accelerated demand for pressure bandages over the forecast period. However, the limited reusability option of the bandages and the adoption of advanced and alternative wound care products such as medical adhesives and tapes are the factors restraining pressure bandage market growth.
This report provides in-depth analysis of pressure bandages market and provides market size (US$ Million) and Cumulative Annual Growth Rate (CAGR %) for the forecast period (2022-2028), considering 2021 as the base year
It elucidates potential revenue opportunities across different segments and explains attractive investment proposition matrix for this market
This study also provides key insights about market drivers, restraints, opportunities, new product launches or approval, market trends, regional outlook, and competitive strategy adopted by the leading players
It profiles leading players in the global pressure bandages market based on the following parameters – company overview, financial performance, product portfolio, market presence, distribution strategies, key developments, and strategies, and future plans
Key companies covered as a part of this study include Medtronic Plc., 3M, Smith & Nephew, ConvaTec, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, BSN Medical, Persys Medical, Tytek Medical, and Nitto Denko Corporation
Insights from this report would allow marketers and the management authorities of the companies to make informed decision regarding their future product launch, technology up-gradation, market expansion, and marketing tactics
The global pressure bandages market report caters to various stakeholders in this industry including investors, suppliers, product manufacturers, distributors, new entrants, and financial analysts
Stakeholders would have ease in decision-making through the various strategy matrices used in analyzing the pressure bandages market
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-elasticity Bandages
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research & Academic institutes
Home Care Settings
Global Pressure Bandages Market, By Geography:
North America
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
U.S.
Canada
Latin America
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
Brazil
Mexico
Argentina
Rest of Latin America
Europe
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
Germany
U.K.
France
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia Pacific
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
China
India
Japan
Australia
South Korea
ASEAN
Rest of Asia Pacific
Middle East
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
GCC
Israel
Rest of Middle East
Africa
By Product Type:
Long Stretch or Elastic Bandages
Multi-component Multilayer Bandage Systems
Short Stretch or Low-Elasticity Bandages
By Compression Pressure:
Light Compression Bandages
Moderate Compression Bandages
High Compression Bandages
By Material:
Cotton Fabric
Latex Free
Polymer
Other (Elastic Fiber)
By Application:
Leg Ulcer
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Surgery
Trauma Injury
Others (Edema, Swellings, Sprains, Lymphedema)
By End User:
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Research and Academic Institutes
Homecare Settings
By Country:
South Africa
Central Africa
North Africa
Company Profiles
Smith & Nephew*
Company Overview
Product Portfolio
Financial Performance
Key Strategies
Recent Developments
3M
Medtronic, Plc.
ConvaTec, Inc.
Cardinal health, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Nitto Denko Corporation
Persys Medical
Tytek Medical
BSN Medical
“*” marked represents similar segmentation in other categories in the respective section.