Cover Image
Market Research Report

Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export

Published by GBI Research Product code 251899
Published Content info 142 Pages
Immediate Delivery Available
Price
Back to Top
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Published: September 30, 2012 Content info: 142 Pages
Description

Summary

GBI Research, a leading business intelligence provider, has released its latest research, "Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export". The study, which is an offering from the company's Energy Research Group, provides an in-depth analysis of the most significant shale plays in North America, such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Haynesville Shale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale. The report provides detailed information and analysis on the operational overview of all of these shale plays, detailing key characteristics, production trends during 2006-2016, and cost trends, which includes well cost, finding and development cost, drilling activity, and planned rigs. The report also contains competitive analysis, analyzing major companies by both acreage and production, and the planned capital expenditure for 2012 by major companies. It also details the major merger and acquisition activities in these shale plays.

Scope

  • An operational overview of shale plays such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Haynesville Shale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale.
  • Key characteristics, detailing the geographic and economic characteristics of the shale plays.
  • Production trends during 2006-2016, and cost trends, which includes well cost and finding and development cost, drilling activity, and planned rigs by major companies for 2012.
  • An overview of the competitive landscape of the top companies by acreage and production in these shale plays.
  • Discussion of the cost per well and finding and development costs of the companies in these shale plays.
  • Drilling activity for all of the shale plays mentioned above.
  • Planned capital expenditure by major companies for 2012 for each of the shale plays.
  • Information on the major mergers and acquisitions.

Reasons to buy

  • Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights into the most significant shale plays in North America, such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Haynesville Shale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale.
  • Identify opportunities and challenges in these shale plays in North America.
  • Plan your strategies based on expected developments of these shale plays in North America.
  • Understand the competitive landscape of the companies in the shale plays.
  • Keep yourself informed of the key developments in this potentially game changing market.

Executive Summary

The Role of Shale Gas in Deciding the US Presidential Election

President Obama faces a shale gas dilemma that threatens to damage his bid to secure a second term in the White House, states the latest report from natural resources experts GBI Research.

The US is currently endowed with a wealth of natural gas following years of overproduction, and while allowing exports would win friends within the industry and potentially boost the economy, it would anger those seeking to keep domestic prices low, says the new report*.

The past few years have seen natural prices falling to around $3 to $4 per million British thermal units (MMBtu), and the US Energy Information Administration EIA expects the annual wellhead natural gas price trend to remain at around $5 per MMBtu until 2025.

By contrast, liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices in potential trade countries, particularly those in Asia, are three times higher, suggesting a highly lucrative export market. However, shipping LNG abroad would alter the supply/demand balance and naturally result in a higher cost for US consumers.

The development of shale gas over recent years has significantly altered the US energy outlook and major industry players have significantly increased their 2012 capital expenditure (capex) for the development of shale plays.

ConocoPhillips and Chesapeake Energy announced respective capex of $2.3 billion and $2.4 billion for the development of the Eagle Ford shale play in 2012, while Bakken shale operators Continental Resources and the Hess Corporation, outlined respective 2012 capex of $1.1 billion and $1.9 billion in 2012.

GBI Research forecasts the total US shale play capex to reach $52.1 billion by 2016, climbing at an average annual growth rate (AAGR) of 11.9% from the expected 2012 figure of $35.3 billion.

Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export

This report look at how the North American shale gas sector has progressed significantly following development of the first shale play: the Barnett Shale.

This report was built using data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research, and in-house analysis conducted by GBI Research's team of industry experts.

Table of Contents
Product Code: GBIGE00060MR

Table of Contents

1. Table of Contents

  • 1.1. List of Tables
  • 1.2. List of Figures

2. Introduction

3. North America Shale Plays, Overview

  • 3.1. Shale Plays, North America
  • 3.2. Shale Gas Development

4. Bakken Shale

  • 4.1. Bakken Shale, Background
    • 4.1.1. Bakken Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • 4.2. Bakken Shale, Operational Overview
    • 4.2.1. Bakken Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 4.3. Bakken Shale, Production Trends
    • 4.3.1. Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006-2016
  • 4.4. Bakken Shale, Cost Trends
    • 4.4.1. Well Cost
    • 4.4.2. Finding and Development Cost
  • 4.5. Bakken Shale, Drilling Activity
    • 4.5.1. Bakken Shale, Drilling Activity, North Dakota, 2012
    • 4.5.2. Bakken Shale, Montana Drilling Activity
  • 4.6. Bakken Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 4.7. Bakken Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 4.7.1. Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 4.7.2. Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Production
    • 4.7.3. Bakken Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 4.8. Bakken Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

5. Barnett Shale

  • 5.1. Barnett Shale, Background
    • 5.1.1. Barnett Shale, Key Characteristics
  • 5.2. Barnett Shale, Operational Overview
    • 5.2.1. Barnett Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 5.3. Barnett Shale, Production Trends, 2000-2016
    • 5.3.1. Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Production Trends, 2000-2016
    • 5.3.2. Barnett Shale Gross Production as a Share of Texas' Total Gross Gas Production
    • 5.3.3. Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by County, 2011
  • 5.4. Barnett Shale, Cost Trends
    • 5.4.1. Well Cost
    • 5.4.2. Finding and Development Cost
  • 5.5. Barnett Shale, Drilling Activity
    • 5.5.1. Barnett Shale, Drilling Permits Issued
  • 5.6. Barnett Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 5.7. Barnett Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 5.7.1. Barnett Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 5.7.2. Barnett Shale, Major Companies by Production
    • 5.7.3. Barnett Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 5.8. Barnett Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

6. Eagle Ford Shale

  • 6.1. Eagle Ford Shale, Background
    • 6.1.1. Eagle Ford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • 6.2. Eagle Ford Shale, Operational Overview
    • 6.2.1. Eagle Ford Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 6.3. Eagle Ford Shale, Production Trends
    • 6.3.1. Eagle Ford Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2000-2016
  • 6.4. Eagle Ford Shale, Drilling Activity
  • 6.5. Eagle Ford Shale, Cost Trends, 2011
    • 6.5.1. Well Cost
    • 6.5.2. Finding and Development Cost
  • 6.6. Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 6.7. Eagle Ford Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 6.7.1. Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage
    • 6.7.2. Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Production, 2011
  • 6.8. Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 6.9. Eagle Ford Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

7. Fayetteville Shale

  • 7.1. Fayetteville Shale, Background
    • 7.1.1. Fayetteville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • 7.2. Fayetteville Shale, Operational Overview
    • 7.2.1. Fayetteville Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 7.3. Fayetteville Shale, Production Trends
    • 7.3.1. Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006-2016
  • 7.4. Fayetteville Shale, Cost Trends
    • 7.4.1. Well Cost
    • 7.4.2. Finding and Development Cost
  • 7.5. Fayetteville Shale, Drilling Activity
  • 7.6. Fayetteville Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 7.7. Fayetteville Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 7.7.1. Fayetteville Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 7.7.2. Fayetteville Shale, Major Companies by Production
  • 7.8. Fayetteville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 7.9. Fayetteville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

8. Haynesville/Bossier Shale

  • 8.1. Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Background
    • 8.1.1. Haynesville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • 8.2. Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Operational Overview
    • 8.2.1. Haynesville Shale, Initial Production Rate
  • 8.3. Haynesville Shale, Production Trends
    • 8.3.1. Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2000-2016
  • 8.4. Haynesville Shale, Cost Trends
    • 8.4.1. Well Cost
    • 8.4.2. Finding and Development Costs
  • 8.5. Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity
    • 8.5.1. Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity, Louisiana
    • 8.5.2. Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity, East Texas
  • 8.6. Haynesville Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 8.7. Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 8.7.1. Haynesville Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 8.7.2. Haynesville Shale, Major Companies by Production
  • 8.8. Haynesville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 8.9. Haynesville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

9. Marcellus Shale

  • 9.1. Marcellus Shale, Background
  • 9.2. Marcellus Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • 9.3. Marcellus Shale, Operational Overview
    • 9.3.1. Marcellus Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 9.4. Marcellus Shale, Production Trends
    • 9.4.1. Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006-2016
  • 9.5. Marcellus Shale, Cost Trends
    • 9.5.1. Well Cost
    • 9.5.2. Finding and Development Cost
  • 9.6. Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity
    • 9.6.1. Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity, Pennsylvania
    • 9.6.2. Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity, New York
  • 9.7. Marcellus Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 9.8. Marcellus Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 9.8.1. Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 9.8.2. Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production
  • 9.9. Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 9.10. Marcellus Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

10. Woodford Shale

  • 10.1. Woodford Shale, Background
  • 10.2. Woodford Shale, Key Characteristics
  • 10.3. Woodford Shale, Operational Overview
    • 10.3.1. Woodford Shale, Initial Production Rates
  • 10.4. Woodford Shale, Production Trends
    • 10.4.1. Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Production Trends, 2000-2016
  • 10.5. Woodford Shale, Cost Trends
    • 10.5.1. Woodford Shale, Well Cost
    • 10.5.2. Woodford Shale, Finding and Development Cost
  • 10.6. Woodford Shale, Drilling Activity
    • 10.6.1. Woodford Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012
  • 10.7. Woodford Shale, Competitive Landscape
    • 10.7.1. Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Acreage
    • 10.7.2. Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Production
    • 10.7.3. Woodford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • 10.8. Woodford Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities

11. Appendix

  • 11.1. Market Definition
  • 11.2. Abbreviations
  • 11.3. Bibliography
  • 11.4. Methodology
    • 11.4.1. Coverage
    • 11.4.2. Secondary Research
    • 11.4.3. Primary Research
    • 11.4.4. Expert Panel Validation
  • 11.5. Contact Us
  • 11.6. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Bakken Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 2: Bakken Shale, Initial Oil and Gas Production Rates by Major Companies (boe/d and Mcfe/d), 2012*
  • Table 3: Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2006-2016
  • Table 4: Bakken Shale, Cost Per Well by Major Companies ($m), 2012*
  • Table 5: Bakken Shale, Finding and Development Cost by Major Companies ($m/boe), 2012*
  • Table 6: Bakken Shale, North Dakota, Well Completions, 2012*
  • Table 7: Bakken Shale, Montana, Well Permits and Well Completions, 2006-2012*
  • Table 8: Bakken Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012*
  • Table 9: Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012
  • Table 10: Bakken Shale, Oil and Gas Production by Major Companies (Mmboe), 2011
  • Table 11: Bakken Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies ($m), 2012
  • Table 12: Bakken Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities
  • Table 13: Barnett Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 14: Barnett Shale, Recent Wells Drilled and Initial Production Rates for EOG Resources, November 2011
  • Table 15: Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000-2016
  • Table 16: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Percentage Share of Texas' Natural Gas Gross Production, 2005-2011
  • Table 17: Barnett Shale, Newark East, Gross Gas Production by County (bcf), 2011
  • Table 18: Barnett Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/well), 2012*
  • Table 19: Barnett Shale, Finding and Development Cost for Major Companies ($/Mcfe), 2012*
  • Table 20: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Number of Drilling Permits Issued, 2004-2011
  • Table 21: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Number of Wells Drilled, 1993-2011
  • Table 22: Barnett Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012*
  • Table 23: Barnett Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies, Acres, 2012*
  • Table 24: Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Table 25: Barnett Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2012
  • Table 26: Barnett Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2010-June 2012
  • Table 27: Eagle Ford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 28: Eagle Ford Shale, Oil and Gas Initial Production Rates by Major Companies, 2011
  • Table 29: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Oil Production (MMbbl), 2008-April 2012
  • Table 30: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Gas Production (bcf), 2008-April 2012
  • Table 31: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Condensate Production (MMbbl), 2008-April 2012
  • Table 32: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2006-2016
  • Table 33: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Number of Drilling Permits Issued, 2008-April 2012
  • Table 34: Eagle Ford Shale, Cost Per Well by Major Companies ($m), 2012*
  • Table 35: Eagle Ford Shale, Finding and Development Cost ($/boe), 2012*
  • Table 36: Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012*
  • Table 37: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2011
  • Table 38: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2011
  • Table 39: Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies ($m), 2012
  • Table 40: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2011-June 2012
  • Table 41: Fayetteville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 42: Fayetteville Shale, Initial Gas Production Rates (MMcf/d), 2011
  • Table 43: Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production (bcf), 2006-2016
  • Table 44: Fayetteville Shale, Average First Month Well Production by County (MMcf), 2008-2011
  • Table 45: Fayetteville Shale, Well Completion by Major Companies, 2008-2011
  • Table 46: Fayetteville Shale, Annual Well Completions in Major Counties, 2008-2011
  • Table 47: Fayetteville Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012*
  • Table 48: Fayetteville Shale, Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Table 49: Fayetteville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2006-2011
  • Table 50: Haynesville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 51: Haynesville Shale, Initial Production Rates of Oil and Gas (boe/d and Mcfe/d), 2012*
  • Table 52: Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000-2016
  • Table 53: Haynesville Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012*
  • Table 54: Haynesville Shale, Finding and Development Cost Per Mcfe ($/Mcfe), 2012*
  • Table 55: Haynesville Shale Play, Louisiana, Well Activity, July 2011-June 2012*
  • Table 56: Haynesville Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012*
  • Table 57: Haynesville Shale Play, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies, Acres, 2012*
  • Table 58: Haynesville Shale Play, Production of the Leading 10 Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Table 59: Haynesville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies ($m), 2012
  • Table 60: Haynesville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2008-2011
  • Table 61: Marcellus Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 62: Marcellus Shale, Initial Oil and Gas Production Rates (boe/d and Mcfe/d), 2012*
  • Table 63: Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000-2016
  • Table 64: Marcellus Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012*
  • Table 65: Marcellus Shale, Finding and Development Cost Per Mcfe ($/Mcfe), 2012*
  • Table 66: Marcellus Shale, Well Permits Issued, Pennsylvania, January 2011-January 2012
  • Table 67: Marcellus Shale, Wells Drilled, Pennsylvania, January 2011-January 2012
  • Table 68: Marcellus Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012*
  • Table 69: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Total Net Acreage (Acres), 2012*
  • Table 70: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production (bcfe), 2011
  • Table 71: Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012
  • Table 72: Marcellus Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2011-June 2012
  • Table 73: Woodford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011
  • Table 74: Woodford Shale, Oil Initial Production Rates by Newfield Exploration Company (boe/d), 2012*
  • Table 75: Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2000-2016
  • Table 76: Woodford Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012*
  • Table 77: Woodford Shale, Well Completions, Oklahoma, 2009-2011

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Shale Plays, Lower 48 States, The US
  • Figure 2: Schematic Geology of Natural Gas Resources
  • Figure 3: Bakken Shale Formation, 2011
  • Figure 4: Bakken Shale Formation, Stratigraphic Column, 2011
  • Figure 5: Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2006-2016
  • Figure 6: Bakken Shale, North Dakota, Well Completions, 2012*
  • Figure 7: Bakken Shale, Montana, Well Permits and Well Completions, 2006-2012*
  • Figure 8: Bakken Shale, Net Acreage of Major Companies (Acres), 2012
  • Figure 9: Bakken Shale, Oil and Gas Production by Major Companies (Mmboe), 2011
  • Figure 10: Barnett Shale Location Map, Texas, 2012
  • Figure 11: Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2006-2016
  • Figure 12: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Percentage Share in Texas' Natural Gross Gas Production, 2005-2011
  • Figure 13: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Gross Gas Production by Major Counties (bcf), 2011
  • Figure 14: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Drilling Permits Issued, 2004-2011
  • Figure 15: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Well Count, 2000-2011
  • Figure 16: Barnett Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012*
  • Figure 17: Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Figure 18: Eagle Ford Shale, The US
  • Figure 19: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Oil Production (MMbbl), 2008-April 2012
  • Figure 20: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Gas Production (bcf), 2008-April 2012
  • Figure 21: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Condensate Production (MMbbl), 2008-April 2012
  • Figure 22: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2006-2016
  • Figure 23: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, No. of Drilling Permits Issued, 2008-May 2012
  • Figure 24: Eagle Ford Shale, The US, Oil and Gas Wells Permitted and Completed, May 2012
  • Figure 25: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012
  • Figure 26: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2011
  • Figure 27: Fayetteville Shale, Location Map, Arkansas
  • Figure 28: Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production (bcf), 2006-2016
  • Figure 29: Fayetteville Shale, Average First Month Well Production by County (MMcf), 2008-2011
  • Figure 30: Fayetteville Shale, Well Completion by Major Companies, 2008-2011
  • Figure 31: Fayetteville Shale, Annual Well Completions in Major Counties, 2008-2011
  • Figure 32: Fayetteville Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012*
  • Figure 33: Fayetteville Shale, Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Figure 34: Haynesville Shale, The US, Location Map
  • Figure 35: Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000-2016
  • Figure 36: Haynesville Shale Play, Louisiana, Well Activity, July 2011-June 2012*
  • Figure 37: Haynesville Shale Play, East Texas, Well Activity, 2012*
  • Figure 38: Haynesville Shale Play, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012*
  • Figure 39: Haynesville Shale Play, Production of the Leading 10 Companies (bcfe), 2011
  • Figure 40: Marcellus Shale, The US, Location Map
  • Figure 41: Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000-2016
  • Figure 42: Marcellus Shale, Well Permits Issued, Pennsylvania, January 2011-January 2012
  • Figure 43: Marcellus Shale, Wells Drilled, Pennsylvania, January 2011-January 2012
  • Figure 44: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Total Net Acreage (Acres), 2012*
  • Figure 45: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production (bcfe), 2011
  • Figure 46: Woodford Shale, Location Map
  • Figure 47: Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2000-2016
  • Figure 48: Woodford Shale, Drilling Activity, Oklahoma
  • Figure 49: Woodford Shale, Well Completions, Oklahoma, 2009-2011
  • Figure 50: Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012*
  • Figure 51: Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (Mmboe), 2011
Back to Top