Notice: Global Information Announces Listing on JASDAQ Standard Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange

Cover Image
Market Research Report

U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Analysis-COVID19-2019-2025-MedSuite-Includes: MIS Interbody Devices, MIS Pedicle Screws, Spinous Process Fixation Devices, Facet Fixation Devices, Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Devices, & Others

Published by iData Research Inc. Product code 601882
Published Content info 314 Pages
Delivery time: 1-2 business days
Price
Back to Top
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Analysis-COVID19-2019-2025-MedSuite-Includes: MIS Interbody Devices, MIS Pedicle Screws, Spinous Process Fixation Devices, Facet Fixation Devices, Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Devices, & Others
Published: March 19, 2021 Content info: 314 Pages
Description

Title:
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Analysis - COVID19 - 2019-2025 - MedSuite - Includes: MIS Interbody Devices, MIS Pedicle Screws, Spinous Process Fixation Devices, Facet Fixation Devices, Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Devices, Spine Endoscopes & MIS Surgery Instrumentation.

Throughout this medical market research, the publisher analyzed 49+ minimally invasive spinal (MIS) implants companies in the United States and utilized their comprehensive methodology to understand the Market Sizes, Unit Sales, ASPs, Company Market Shares, and to create accurate forecasts.

While this report suite report contains all of the U.S. MIS Implants market analysis, each of the market segments is also available as a stand-alone a report, MedCore.

Markets Covered

MIS Interbody Devices Market - MedCore

MIS Pedicle Screws Market - MedCore

Spinous Process Fixation Devices Market - MedCore

Facet Fixation Devices Market - MedCore

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Devices Market - MedCore

Spine Endoscopes Market - MedCore

MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market - MedCore

U.S. MIS Implants Market Insights

Overall, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implants market was valued at $1.7 billion in 2020. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a low-single-digit rate, to exceed $2.2 billion in 2025.

The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward OLIF and LLIF devices and away from MIPLIF and MITLIF devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.

Medtronic holds the leading competitor in the U.S. MIS implant market. The company is the leading competitor in the MIS pedicle screw market and hold a leading share in the MIS interbody device market, due to the Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion (DLIF®) procedure and its minimal access spine technologies (MAST) systems. Medtronic's MIS fusion technologies are further complemented by their other minimally invasive procedures, such as the X-Stop® interspinous spacer.

Table of Contents
Product Code: iDATA_USMIS19_MS

For a full table of contents please reach out to iData Research.

TABLE OF CONTENTS I

LIST OF FIGURES XII

LIST OF CHARTS XXI

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

EUROPE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 1

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3

MARKET TRENDS 6

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8

PROCEDURES COVERED 9

MARKETS INCLUDED 10

VERSION HISTORY 10

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 11

  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 11
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 14
  • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 16
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research 17
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 19
  • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 20
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 22
  • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 23
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 24

IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE EUROPEAN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET 25

  • 2.1 INTRODUCTION 25
  • 2.2 ANALYSIS BY MARKET SEGMENT 29
    • 2.2.1 Best Case Scenario 29
    • 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario 30
    • 2.2.3 Worst Case Scenario 31

DISEASE OVERVIEW 33

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION 33
    • 3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease 33
      • 3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation 33
      • 3.1.1.2 Stenosis 34
      • 3.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis 34
      • 3.1.1.4 Arthritis 35
    • 3.1.2 Spinal Deformities 35
      • 3.1.2.1 Scoliosis 35
      • 3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis 36
    • 3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor 37
    • 3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures 37
      • 3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis 37
      • 3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures 38

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 39

  • 4.1 INTRODUCTION 39
  • 4.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 39
    • 4.2.1 Cervical Fixation 39
      • 4.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation 40
      • 4.2.1.1.1 Constrained 40
      • 4.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained 40
      • 4.2.1.1.3 Dynamic 40
      • 4.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable 41
      • 4.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation 41
    • 4.2.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation 44
      • 4.2.2.1 Traditional Systems 44
      • 4.2.2.2 Minimally Invasive Systems 44
    • 4.2.3 Interbody Devices 49
      • 4.2.3.1 Approaches 49
      • 4.2.3.1.1 ALIF 49
      • 4.2.3.1.2 PLIF 50
      • 4.2.3.1.3 TLIF 50
      • 4.2.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF 50
      • 4.2.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF 51
      • 4.2.3.1.6 LLIF 51
      • 4.2.3.1.7 OLIF 51
      • 4.2.3.1.8 Cervical 51
      • 4.2.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy 52
      • 4.2.3.2 Materials 52
      • 4.2.3.2.1 Metal 52
      • 4.2.3.2.2 PEEK 52
      • 4.2.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft 52
    • 4.2.4 Motion Preservation Devices 58
      • 4.2.4.1.1 Artificial Discs 58
      • 4.2.4.1.2 Dynamic Stabilization 58
      • 4.2.4.1.3 Nucleus Replacement 59
      • 4.2.4.1.4 Facet Arthroplasty 59
    • 4.2.5 Spinous Process Fixation 62
    • 4.2.6 Facet Fixation 64
    • 4.2.7 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 66
    • 4.2.8 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices 68
      • 4.2.8.1.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 68
      • 4.2.8.1.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty 69
    • 4.2.9 Spine Endoscopes 71
    • 4.2.10 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices 73
  • 4.3 PRODUCT PIPELINES 75
    • 4.3.1 Nexxt Spine 75
      • 4.3.1.1 SAXXONY™ Posterior Cervical Thoracic System 75
      • 4.3.1.2 NEXXT MATRIXX™ Cervical Interbody/VBR System 75
    • 4.3.2 NLT Spine/SeaSpine 76
      • 4.3.2.1 PROW FUSION-V™ - Expandable Intervertebral Fusion Device 76
      • 4.3.2.2 PROW FUSION-L™ - Lateral Intervertebral Fusion Device 76
      • 4.3.2.3 SIJ- Expandable Screw 76
    • 4.3.3 SpineArt 76
      • 4.3.3.1 PERLA® 76
      • 4.3.3.2 OTELO®LL 76
    • 4.3.4 SpineFrontier 77
      • 4.3.4.1 SIJ-Fuse Rod 77
      • 4.3.4.2 SIJ-Fuse Screw 77
      • 4.3.4.3 VBR 77
      • 4.3.4.4 PedFuse Rely 77
      • 4.3.4.5 LESplasty 77
      • 4.3.4.6 Expanding P-LIFT 77
  • 4.4 DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES 78
    • 4.4.1 3D Printed Implants 78
    • 4.4.2 Endoscopic Spine Surgery 79
    • 4.4.3 Metallurgy/Alloy of Instrumentation 79
    • 4.4.4 Nanotechnology Use in Spinal Implants 79
    • 4.4.5 Operating Room Automation and Connectivity 80
  • 4.5 FDA RECALLS 81
    • 4.5.1 Alphatec Spine 81
    • 4.5.2 Amedica 82
    • 4.5.3 Back 2 Basics Direct 82
    • 4.5.4 DePuy Synthes 83
    • 4.5.5 Innovasis 84
    • 4.5.6 Interventional Spine 85
    • 4.5.7 Kiscomedica 85
    • 4.5.8 Medacta 86
    • 4.5.9 Medtronic 86
    • 4.5.10 Neuropro Spinal Jaxx 89
    • 4.5.11 Orthofix 89
    • 4.5.12 OrthoPediatrics Corp 91
    • 4.5.13 SpineArt 92
    • 4.5.14 Stryker 92
    • 4.5.15 Ulrich Medical USA Inc 94
    • 4.5.16 XTANT MEDICAL INC 94
    • 4.5.17 Zimmer Biomet 95
  • 4.6 CLINICAL TRIALS 97
    • 4.6.1 DePuy Synthes 97
    • 4.6.2 Duke University 98
    • 4.6.3 Globus Medical 98
    • 4.6.4 Hamilton Health Sciences 99
    • 4.6.5 K2M (Stryker) 99
    • 4.6.6 Medtronic 100
    • 4.6.7 Nexxt Spine 103
    • 4.6.8 RTI Surgical 104
    • 4.6.9 Stryker 104
    • 4.6.10 Orthofix 105
    • 4.6.11 Premia Spine 106
    • 4.6.12 Zimmer Biomet 106

EUROPE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 108

  • 5.2 CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE 114
  • 5.3 MARKET OVERVIEW 115
  • 5.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT 121
  • 5.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 124
    • 5.5.1 Market Drivers 124
    • 5.5.2 Market Limiters 125
  • 5.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 127
  • 5.7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 133
  • 5.8 COMPANY PROFILES 136

COUNTRY PROFILES 165

PROCEDURE NUMBERS 176

  • 7.1 INTRODUCTION 176
  • 7.2 PROCEDURES 177
    • 7.2.1 MIS Interbody Device Procedures 180
      • 7.2.1.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Levels Treated 183
      • 7.2.1.2 MIPLIF Procedures 186
      • 7.2.1.3 MITLIF Procedures 189
      • 7.2.1.4 LLIF Procedures 192
      • 7.2.1.5 OLIF Procedures 195
    • 7.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 198
      • 7.2.2.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Levels Treated 201
      • 7.2.2.2 Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 204
      • 7.2.2.3 Percutaneous MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 207
    • 7.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures 210
    • 7.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures 213
      • 7.2.4.1 Facet Fixation Levels Treated 216
    • 7.2.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures 218
    • 7.2.6 Spine Endoscope Procedures 221

MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET 223

  • 8.1 INTRODUCTION 223
    • 8.1.1 Approach Types 224
      • 8.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 224
      • 8.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 224
      • 8.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 225
      • 8.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion 225
      • 8.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion 225
      • 8.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion 226
      • 8.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion 226
  • 8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 227
  • 8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 232
    • 8.3.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Market 232
    • 8.3.2 MIPLIF Market 239
    • 8.3.3 MITLIF Market 246
    • 8.3.4 LLIF Market 253
    • 8.3.5 OLIF Market 260
  • 8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 267
    • 8.4.1 Market Drivers 267
    • 8.4.2 Market Limiters 268
  • 8.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 270

MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET 275

  • 9.1 INTRODUCTION 275
    • 9.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 275
    • 9.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 276
  • 9.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 277
  • 9.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 282
    • 9.3.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market 282
    • 9.3.2 Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market 289
    • 9.3.3 Percutaneous MIS Pedicle Screw Market 297
  • 9.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 305
    • 9.4.1 Market Drivers 305
    • 9.4.2 Market Limiters 306
  • 9.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 308

SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET 312

  • 10.1 INTRODUCTION 312
  • 10.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 313
  • 10.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 321
    • 10.3.1 Market Drivers 321
    • 10.3.2 Market Limiters 322
  • 10.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 323

FACET FIXATION MARKET 327

  • 11.1 INTRODUCTION 327
  • 11.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 328
  • 11.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 335
    • 11.3.1 Market Drivers 335
    • 11.3.2 Market Limiters 336
  • 11.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 338

MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION MARKET 341

  • 12.1 INTRODUCTION 341
  • 12.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 343
  • 12.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 350
    • 12.3.1 Market Drivers 350
    • 12.3.2 Market Limiters 351
  • 12.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 353

SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET 357

  • 13.1 INTRODUCTION 357
  • 13.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 358
  • 13.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 363
    • 13.3.1 Endoscope Market 363
    • 13.3.2 Instrumentation Market 370
  • 13.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 377
    • 13.4.1 Market Drivers 377
    • 13.4.2 Market Limiters 378
  • 13.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 380
Back to Top