Cover Image
Market Research Report
Product code 
1045885

5G: The Greatest Show on Earth - Volume 21, 5G NR CA in DC (5G NR Benchmark Study, TDD-TDD and FDD-TDD Carrier Aggregation (CA) Using the T-Mobile USA Network in Washington, D.C.)

Published: | Signals Research Group | 39 Pages | Delivery time: 1-2 business days

Price

Back to Top
5G: The Greatest Show on Earth - Volume 21, 5G NR CA in DC (5G NR Benchmark Study, TDD-TDD and FDD-TDD Carrier Aggregation (CA) Using the T-Mobile USA Network in Washington, D.C.)
Published: January 10, 2022
Signals Research Group
Content info: 39 Pages
Delivery time: 1-2 business days
  • ALL
  • Description
  • Table of Contents
Description

SRG just completed its 21 st 5G NR benchmark study. For this endeavor we conducted a benchmark study of TDD-TDD and FDD-TDD carrier aggregation (CA) using the T-Mobile USA network in the Washington, D.C., area where Ericsson is the infrastructure supplier. To the best of our knowledge, T-Mobile is the first operator to deploy both flavors of 5G NR CA in its commercial network.

Highlights of the Report include the following:

  • Our Thanks. We did this study in collaboration with Accuver Americas and Spirent Communications who provided us with their respective test equipment and platforms, which we identify in the report. SRG did all the testing and analysis of the data and we are solely responsible for the commentary in the report.
  • Our Methodology. We used two Galaxy S21 smartphones to do comparative testing which allowed us to quantify the coverage benefits of FDD-TDD CA and the throughput benefits of TDD-TDD CA. We also tested Non-standalone (NSA) versus Standalone (SA), in which we looked at CA performance as well as handover times, latency, and jitter.
  • CA Results. Not surprisingly, we observed the same incremental benefits with 5G NR CA that exist with LTE CA. In the case of T-Mobile, the operator is using 100 MHz for the Primary Cell (P Cell) and 20 MHz for the Secondary Cell (S Cell), both in Band n41 (2.5 GHz). Peak speed was >1.7 Gbps with LTE (NSA), but the benefit of using TDD-TDD SA is that 5G NR performance is better than with TDD-TDD NSA when there is loading on the LTE network. Further SA allows the operator to move away from LTE and its limitations.
  • FDD-TDD CA is more Interesting. With FDD-TDD CA, Band n71 is used for the P Cell with Band n41 (100 MHz channel) serving as the S Cell. With this configuration, we documented greater Band n41 coverage as well as instances of higher throughput closer to the cell.
  • Smartphone Battery Temperature. We analyzed the impact of sustained downlink data transfers on the smartphone battery temperature. Ignoring exogenous factors, it is possible to download significant amounts of data before the smartphone does a 5G NR radio link failure (RLF) due to temperature, but exogenous factors cannot be ignored.
  • Handovers, Latency and Jitter. We documented significant improvements in handover times, as well as some differences in latency and jitter with the NSA mode than with the SA mode.
Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1.0. Executive Summary

2.0. Key Observations

3.0. Downlink Performance Results and Analysis

4.0. FDD-TDD Coverage Extension Analysis

5.0. Thermal and Handover Analysis

  • 5.1. Thermal Analysis
  • 5.2. Handover Analysis
  • 5.3. Latency and Jitter

6.0. Test Methodology

7.0. Final Thoughts

Index of Figures & Tables

  • Figure 1. Testing Routes in and around Washington, D.C.
  • Figure 2. 5G NR NSA Drive Route
  • Figure 3. 5G NR SA Drive Route
  • Figure 4. 5G NR Standalone Throughput Distribution and Average Values
  • Figure 5. 5G NR Non-Standalone Throughput Distribution and Average Values
  • Figure 6. 5G NR Standalone PDSCH Throughput Versus SINR
  • Figure 7. 5G NR Non-Standalone PDSCH Throughput Versus SINR
  • Figure 8. 5G NR Standalone PDSCH Throughput Versus RSRP
  • Figure 9. 5G NR Non-Standalone PDSCH Throughput Versus RSRP
  • Figure 10. 5G NR Non-Standalone P Cell and S Cell PDSCH Throughput Versus RSRP
  • Figure 11. 5G NR Non-Standalone P Cell and S Cell PDSCH Throughput Versus SINR
  • Figure 12. 5G NR Non-Standalone PUSCH Transmit Power Versus RSRP
  • Figure 13. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only Band n41 Throughput Versus RSRP
  • Figure 14. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only Band n41 Throughput Versus RSRP - enhanced
  • Figure 15. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only Band n41 Downlink MCS Versus RSRP
  • Figure 16. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only P Cell PUSCH Transmit Power Versus Band n41 RSRP
  • Figure 17. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only P Cell PUSCH Transmit Power Versus RSRP
  • Figure 18. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only RSRP Versus Distance
  • Figure 19. TDD-TDD Standalone P Cell RSRP Versus Distance Scatter Plot
  • Figure 20. FDD-TDD P Cell RSRP Versus Distance Scatter Plot
  • Figure 21. TDD-TDD Non-Standalone P Cell RSRP Versus Distance Scatter Plot
  • Figure 22. FDD-TDD Versus TDD Only Transmit Power Versus Distance
  • Figure 23. 5G NR TDD-TDD Bn41 Standalone PDSCH RB Normalized Throughput Versus Distance Scatter Plot
  • Figure 24. 5G NR TDD-TDD Bn41 Non-Standalone PDSCH RB Normalized Throughput Versus Distance Scatter Plot
  • Figure 25. Downloaded 5G NR + LTE Data, and Battery Temperature versus Time
  • Figure 26. Downloaded 5G NR + LTE Data, and Battery Temperature versus Time
  • Figure 27. Downloaded 5G NR + LTE Data, and Battery Temperature versus Time
  • Figure 28. Sample Outcomes
  • Figure 29. NSA and SA Handover Times
  • Figure 30. NSA and SA Handover Times
  • Figure 31. NSA and SA Downlink One-Way Latency and Jitter Times
  • Figure 32. NSA and SA Uplink One-Way Latency and Jitter Times
  • Figure 33. XCAL-M in Action
  • Figure 34. Umetrix Data Architecture