Notice: Global Information Announces Listing on JASDAQ Standard Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange

Cover Image
Market Research Report

<2020> Redox Flow Battery Technology Trend and Market Forecast (~2025)

Published by SNE Research Product code 955705
Published Content info 308 Pages
Delivery time: Inquiry
Price

Notice: The original report is written in Korean. Please ask us for more information regarding delivery time.

Back to Top
<2020> Redox Flow Battery Technology Trend and Market Forecast (~2025)
Published: August 19, 2020 Content info: 308 Pages
Description

As eco-friendly renewable energy sources, such as wind power, solar PV, etc., have recently spread, the High Capacity Energy Storage System (ESS) market is receiving attention in storing the electric energy produced here, and the Redox Flow Battery technology, one of the batteries that can store energy, is also developing together.

Unlike the conventional lead & lithium-based batteries, the Redox Flow Battery is a system where the active material in a water-soluble electrolyte made of liquid is oxidized/reduced and then charged/discharged, which is an electrochemical capacitor that directly stores the chemical energy of the electrolyte as electrical energy.

Currently, pumping-up power generation and others among ESS applications are widely used, but due to problems, such as costs, geographical constraints, environmental destruction, etc., Redox Flow Batteries have recently emerged as an alternative, whose prospects are quite bright as researches to improve the energy efficiency, their disadvantage, are being continuously conducted.

The Flow Battery can cope with the markets from the KWh-class small size to MWh-class large size and has the strength of having a long life of 20 years. Furthermore, the fact that its Energy and Power is separated could be a great advantage, but because only small production at the project level and demonstration projects are underway so there is no mass production line unlike rival technologies including LiB and ALAB, reducing costs and securing mass production technologies is also now insufficient. In addition, owing to the upsurge in prices of the raw material vanadium in 2019, there are difficulties in securing price competitiveness, compared to LiB, the rival technology.

In contrast with this, in the case of LiB which is its rival technology, mass production technology has been matured because large companies, such as LG, Samsung, CATL, etc., which have large-scale mass production lines, are participating in the ESS market; as the price drop continues to occur due to this, it is acting as the biggest obstacle to the entry of the Flow Battery into the market. However, because fire accidents have continuously occurred in ESS where LiB is applied since 2019, for Flow Batteries, now could be the best opportunity to enter the market, as it is the time point that the market demand for a high-safety secondary battery that can replace this is increasing. SNE Research has explored the installation performance, current status of major companies, and technical challenges to be solved for Redox Flow Batteries, up to the recent date, and forecasted the mid- to long-term market until 2025.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

I. Development Status of High-Capacity Energy Storage Technology

  • 1.1. Concept of high-capacity energy storage system
  • 1.2. Types and features of high-capacity energy storage technology
    • 1.2.1. Pumped storage
    • 1.2.2. Compressed air
    • 1.2.3. Flywheel
    • 1.2.4. Lead acid
    • 1.2.5. NaS battery
    • 1.2.6. Lithium ion battery
    • 1.2.7. Supercapacitor
    • 1.2.8. Redox flow battery
  • 1.3. Development trend of high-capacity energy storage technology by country
    • 1.3.1. Japan
    • 1.3.2. South Korea
    • 1.3.3. China
    • 1.3.4. USA
    • 1.3.5. Europe

II. Redox Flow Battery Technology

  • 2.1. Necessity of development of Redox Flow Battery
  • 2.2. Understanding Redox Flow Battery
    • 2.2.1. Concept of Redox Flow
    • 2.2.1. Development history of Redox Flow Battery
  • 2.3. Technology of Redox Flow Battery
    • 2.3.1. Configuration of RFB ESS
    • 2.3.2. RFB stack
    • 2.3.3. RFB BOP
    • 2.3.4. Core materials of RFB

III. Application Case for Redox Flow Battery

  • 3.1. Load Leveling
  • 3.2. Power Quality Control Applications
  • 3.3. Coupling with Renewable Energy Sources
  • 3.4. Electric Vehicles

IV. Recent Technical Issue and Development Trend of Redox Flow Battery

  • 4.1. Lower-price
  • 4.2. High-power large stack
  • 4.3. High energy density

V. Patent Trend of Redox Flow Battery

  • 5.1. Patent analysis scope and criteria of Redox Flow Battery
  • 5.2. Patent trend by host state of the Patent Office
    • 5.2.1. Patent trend by year and patent share by host state
    • 5.2.2. Patent share by host state of the Patent Office
    • 5.2.3. Technology development degree
  • 5.3. Patent trend by technology classification
    • 5.3.1. Number of patents for each year by major classification
    • 5.3.2. Patent share by middle classification and number of patents by year
    • 5.3.3. Patent status by middle classification, by host state of the Patent Office, and by section
  • 5.4. Applicant's Patent Trend
    • 5.4.1. All top applicants of Redox Flow Battery
    • 5.4.2. All top applicants of Redox Flow Battery by major classification
    • 5.4.3. Top applicants of Redox Flow Battery by host state of the Patent Office
    • 5.4.4. Patent trend of major applicant (Sumitomo Electric)

VI. Technology Development and Business Trends of Major Research Institutes and Companies

  • 6.1. USA
    • 6.1.1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
    • 6.1.2. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)
    • 6.1.3. UniEnergy Technologies
    • 6.1.4. Imergy Power Systems
    • 6.1.5. EnerVault
    • 6.1.6. ZBB Energy
    • 6.1.7. Vionx Energy Coporation
    • 6.1.8. StorEn Technologies Inc.
    • 6.1.9. Primus Power
    • 6.1.10. ViZn Energy Systems
    • 6.1.11. ESS Inc.
  • 6.2. Canada
    • 6.2.1. Northern Graphite
    • 6.2.2. CellCube Energy Storage Systems Inc.
  • 6.3. Japan
    • 6.3.1. Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
    • 6.3.2. Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc.
    • 6.3.3. Okinawa Electric Power Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4. Europe
    • 6.4.1. Fraunhofer ICT (Institute for chemical technology) (Germany)
    • 6.4.2. Gildemeister energy solutions (Germany)
    • 6.4.3. JENA Batteries (Germany)
    • 6.4.4. VoltStorage GmbH (Germany)
    • 6.4.5. Vanadis power GmbH (Germany)
    • 6.4.6. REDT UK Ltd. (UK)
    • 6.4.7. EDP(Spain)
    • 6.4.8. Plurion Systems(UK)
    • 6.4.9. ITI Energy (UK)
    • 6.4.10. Invinity Energy System (UK)
    • 6.4.11. RISO DTU (Denmark)
    • 6.4.12. Pinflow Energy Storage (Czech Public)
  • 6.5. Australia
    • 6.5.1. RedFlow
    • 6.5.2. VSUN Energy
  • 6.6. China
    • 6.6.1. Prudent Energy
    • 6.6.2. GEFC
    • 6.6.3. DICP
    • 6.6.4. Rongke Power Co. Ltd
  • 6.7. South Korea
    • 6.7.1. Development status of aqueous RFB
    • 6.7.2. Development status of non-aqueous RFB

VII. Standardization of Flow Battery

  • 7.1. International standardization activities
    • 7.1.1. International standards
    • 7.1.2. Domestic standards

VIII. Flow Battery Market Forecast

  • 8.1. Installation results by Flow Battery maker
    • 8.1.1. Prudent
    • 8.1.2. Sumitomo Electric Industries
    • 8.1.3. ZBB
  • 8.2. Installation results of worldwide Flow Battery
  • 8.3. Global Flow Battery market forecast
  • 8.4. Flow Battery market forecast by country
  • 8.5. Case study of Flow Battery installation
  • 8.6. Flow Battery Market Factor Analysis
    • 8.6.1. Flow Battery Technology Position
    • 8.6.2. Flow Battery Cost
    • 8.6.3. Demonstration and application case of Flow Battery
    • 8.6.4. Flow Battery SWOT Analysis
    • 8.6.5. Flow Battery Market Forecast
Back to Top