Picture
SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Astute Analytica | PRODUCT CODE: 1804261

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Astute Analytica | PRODUCT CODE: 1804261

Global Food Safety Testing Market: Microbiological Test, Product Type, Technology, End User, Region-Market Size, Industry Dynamics, Opportunity Analysis and Forecast for 2025-2033

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 668 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PDF (Single User License)
USD 4250
PDF & Excel (Multi User License)
USD 5250
PDF, Excel & PPT (Corporate User License)
USD 6400

Add to Cart

The global food safety testing market plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity and quality of the food supply chain. It involves the application of scientific techniques to detect microbiological, physical, and chemical contaminants, as well as pathogens and adulterants in food products. Valued at approximately US$21.24 billion in 2024, the market is poised for substantial growth, with projections estimating its worth to reach US$44.74 billion by 2033. This growth corresponds to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.63% over the forecast period from 2025 to 2033, highlighting the increasing global emphasis on food safety driven by evolving regulatory frameworks, rapid technological advancements, and changing industry demands.

North America stands out as a dominant force within the global food safety testing market, commanding a significant 41.54% share. This leadership position is largely attributable to the region's stringent regulatory environment and the high frequency of food recalls, which emphasize the critical need for rigorous food safety practices. In 2024, regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) collectively managed between 296 and 300 food recalls.

The primary causes of these recalls were undeclared allergens and contamination by pathogens including Listeria, Salmonella, and E. coli. The impact of these incidents was severe, resulting in approximately 1,400 reported illnesses, 487 hospitalizations, and 19 fatalities-a marked increase in severity compared to the previous year. Similarly, Canada's Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) issued 89 food safety advisories during the same timeframe, reflecting a vigilant and proactive stance toward protecting public health. Together, these statistics underscore North America's leading role in driving advancements and maintaining high standards in food safety testing.

Noteworthy Market Developments

The food safety testing market is currently experiencing significant innovation and increased investment, underscoring the growing awareness of its vital role in protecting public health and sustaining consumer confidence. This heightened focus is reflected in the surge of funding dedicated to advancing food safety research, infrastructure, and workforce development. A notable example is the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), which recently announced a $14 million investment aimed at supporting food safety research, outreach programs, and workforce training initiatives.

In addition to governmental support, technological innovation is driving new solutions for food hygiene monitoring. NEMIS Technologies, for example, has introduced ATP GO and ATP GO Liquid, portable and rapid testing methods designed for "on-the-go" hygiene assessment. These tools measure adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is a key indicator of contamination from microbes or food residues on surfaces and equipment in food production and processing environments.

Further bolstering food safety efforts, the Telangana government in India has recently announced plans to establish specialized testing infrastructure in Hyderabad and its surrounding districts. This initiative includes the creation of mini-labs in each zone of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), aimed at enhancing the capacity and quality of food sample testing. The GHMC will play a key role in identifying suitable locations for these new facilities, which are expected to improve local food safety monitoring and quality control.

Core Growth Drivers

A major factor fueling the growth of the global food safety testing market is the rising prevalence of foodborne illnesses worldwide. In the United States alone, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that approximately one in six Americans-equivalent to 48 million people-fall ill from foodborne diseases each year. Of these, around 128,000 require hospitalization, and tragically, about 3,000 succumb to these illnesses.

On a global scale, the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that contaminated food causes illness in an estimated 600 million people annually. This staggering number results in approximately 420,000 deaths and the loss of 33 million healthy life years, measured in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The impact extends beyond health, affecting productivity and imposing heavy financial burdens on healthcare systems. Low- and middle-income countries, in particular, bear the brunt of these losses, with economic damages estimated at a staggering US$110 billion each year.

Children under the age of five suffer disproportionately from foodborne diseases, accounting for 40% of all cases worldwide. Each year, foodborne illnesses claim the lives of approximately 125,000 young children, highlighting the vulnerability of this age group and the urgent need for targeted interventions to protect them. Given the widespread and severe consequences of foodborne illnesses, addressing food safety is essential for improving global public health outcomes.

Emerging Technology Trends

Technological advancements in food safety testing methodologies have brought about significant improvements in both the accuracy and efficiency of detecting contaminants. Innovations such as DNA-based and rapid testing methods have revolutionized the way food safety challenges are addressed, especially in the context of a globalized and highly interconnected food supply chain.

DNA-based and rapid testing techniques provide faster and more accurate detection of foodborne pathogens and contaminants compared to conventional culture-based methods. Techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and various immunoassays leverage the unique properties of DNA sequences or antibody-antigen interactions to specifically identify the presence of harmful microorganisms or toxins.

Barriers to Optimization

Despite the increasing demand for food safety testing, the market faces significant challenges due to the high cost of testing instruments and associated expenses. Food safety testing requires specialized equipment and skilled personnel, both of which represent substantial financial investments that can be especially burdensome for smaller businesses.

Labor costs contribute significantly to the overall expense of pathogen testing. According to FoodSafetyTech, the average labor cost per pathogen test is approximately $14. Although this figure can vary widely, ranging from $8 to $20 depending on the complexity of the test and local labor market conditions.

For larger organizations dealing with high-risk products, the annual costs associated with food safety prevention measures, including testing, monitoring, and quality assurance, can be substantial, sometimes reaching between $200,000 and $600,000. Faced with these steep costs, some businesses may opt to reduce the frequency or comprehensiveness of their testing protocols, or in some cases, forego testing altogether. This cost-cutting approach puts consumers at greater risk of exposure to contaminated or unsafe food products.

MDPI further highlights that specific tests, such as those for Salmonella and Campylobacter, typically cost between $10 and $14 each, adding to the cumulative expenses businesses must bear. The high cost of food safety equipment and services poses a significant barrier to market growth, especially in developing countries where resources and funding are limited.

Detailed Market Segmentation

By testing method, microbial testing holds a commanding 36% share of the food safety testing market, reflecting its critical role in safeguarding the food supply. This segment's influence is growing steadily, driven by the persistent threat of pathogens that frequently cause high-profile product recalls and foodborne illness outbreaks. The importance of microbial testing cannot be overstated, as it serves as a vital line of defense in identifying harmful microorganisms in food products before they reach consumers, thereby protecting public health and maintaining brand reputation.

By product type, processed food testing accounts for more than 20% of the food safety testing market, a reflection of the increasing consumer demand for ready-to-eat meals and convenience snacks. As lifestyles become busier and preferences shift toward quick and easy meal options, the processed food sector has experienced significant growth. In 2024, this sector reached a staggering value of 4.1 trillion dollars, underscoring its economic importance and vast scale.

By technology, traditional methods continue to dominate the food safety testing market, capturing approximately 52.67% of the share. This enduring preference is largely due to their culture-based workflows, which have long been established as reliable and robust. These methods produce data that is not only scientifically sound but also widely accepted in legal and regulatory contexts, making them particularly valuable when litigation or compliance issues arise. The proven track record of culture-based testing provides food manufacturers and regulators with confidence in the accuracy and defensibility of the results.

By service sourcing, in-house services currently hold a dominant position in the food safety testing market, accounting for a substantial 52.56% share. This strong foothold is largely attributed to the operational advantages offered by private laboratories that are directly embedded within production facilities. Having testing capabilities on-site allows for real-time monitoring and quicker response times, which can significantly streamline quality control processes and reduce delays often associated with outsourcing tests to external labs.

Segment Breakdown

By Test Method

  • Microbiological Test
    • Total Plate Count (TPC)
    • Coliform Testing
    • Listeria Testing
    • Salmonella Testing
    • Campylobacter Testing
  • Sensory Test
    • Manual
      • Smell
      • Taste
      • Appearance
      • Others
    • Instrumental
      • Smell
      • Taste
      • Appearance
      • Others
  • Physical Test
  • Chemical Test
  • Allergen Test
  • Others

By Product Type

  • Processed Food
  • Fruits &Vegetables
  • Beverages
  • Grains & Cereal
  • Confectionery
  • Meat & Meat Products
  • Milk & Milk Products
  • Others

By Technology

  • Traditional Testing
  • Rapid Testing

By Service Sourcing

  • Inhouse
  • Outsource

By End User

  • Food & Beverage
  • Academic and Research Institutions
  • Testing Laboratories
  • North America
    • The U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • The UK
    • Germany
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia & New Zealand
    • ASEAN
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Thailand
      • Indonesia
      • Philippines
      • Vietnam
      • Rest of ASEAN
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
    • UAE
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Rest of MEA
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Rest of South America

Leading Market Participants

  • ALS
  • Biomerieux
  • Eurofins Scientific
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Merck KGaA
  • Merieux NutriSciences
  • NSF
  • SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA
  • Symbio Labs
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • TUV SUD
  • Other Prominent Players
Product Code: AA03251218

Table of Content

Chapter 1. Research Framework

  • 1.1. Research Objective
  • 1.2. Product Overview
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation

Chapter 2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Qualitative Research
    • 2.1.1. Primary & Secondary Sources
  • 2.2. Quantitative Research
    • 2.2.1. Primary & Secondary Sources
  • 2.3. Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents, By Region
  • 2.4. Assumption for the Study
  • 2.5. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation

Chapter 3. Executive Summary: Global Food Safety Testing Market

Executive Summary: Global Food Safety Testing Market

Chapter 4. Global Food Safety Testing Market Overview

  • 4.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.1.1. Service Provider
    • 4.1.2. End User
  • 4.2. Industry Outlook
    • 4.2.1. Overview of food & beverage industry
    • 4.2.2. Overview of government initiatives for safety food testing
  • 4.3. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.4.3. Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.4.4. Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.4.5. Degree of Competition
  • 4.5. Market Dynamics and Trends
    • 4.5.1. Growth Drivers
    • 4.5.2. Restraints
    • 4.5.3. Challenges
    • 4.5.4. Key Trends
  • 4.6. Covid-19 Impact Assessment on Market Growth Trend
  • 4.7. Market Growth and Outlook
    • 4.7.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Bn), 2020 - 2033
  • 4.8. Competition Dashboard
    • 4.8.1. Market Concentration Rate
    • 4.8.2. Company Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2024
    • 4.8.3. Competitor Mapping

Chapter 5. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By Test Method

  • 5.1. Key Insights
  • 5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 5.2.1. Microbiological Test
      • 5.2.1.1. Total Plate Count (TPC)
      • 5.2.1.2. Coliform Testing
      • 5.2.1.3. Listeria Testing
      • 5.2.1.4. Salmonella Testing
      • 5.2.1.5. Campylobacter Testing
    • 5.2.2. Sensory Test
      • 5.2.2.1. Manual
        • 5.2.2.1.1. Smell
        • 5.2.2.1.2. Taste
        • 5.2.2.1.3. Appearance
        • 5.2.2.1.4. Others
      • 5.2.2.2. Instrumental
        • 5.2.2.2.1. Smell
        • 5.2.2.2.2. Taste
        • 5.2.2.2.3. Appearance
        • 5.2.2.2.4. Others
    • 5.2.3. Physical Test
    • 5.2.4. Chemical Test
    • 5.2.5. Allergen Test
    • 5.2.6. Others

Chapter 6. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By Product Type

  • 6.1. Key Insights
  • 6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 6.2.1. Processed Food
    • 6.2.2. Fruits &Vegetables
    • 6.2.3. Beverages
    • 6.2.4. Grains & Cereal
    • 6.2.5. Confectionery
    • 6.2.6. Meat& Meat Products
    • 6.2.7. Milk & Milk Products
    • 6.2.8. Others

Chapter 7. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By Technology

  • 7.1. Key Insights
  • 7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 7.2.1. Traditional Testing
    • 7.2.2. Rapid Testing

Chapter 8. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By Service Sourcing

  • 8.1. Key Insights
  • 8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 8.2.1. Inhouse
    • 8.2.2. Outsource

Chapter 9. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By End User

  • 9.1. Key Insights
  • 9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 9.2.1. Food & Beverage
    • 9.2.2. Academic and Research Institutions
    • 9.2.3. Testing Laboratories

Chapter 10. Global Food Safety Testing Market Analysis, By Region

  • 10.1. Key Insights
  • 10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 10.2.1. North America
      • 10.2.1.1. The U.S.
      • 10.2.1.2. Canada
      • 10.2.1.3. Mexico
    • 10.2.2. Europe
      • 10.2.2.1. The UK
      • 10.2.2.2. Germany
      • 10.2.2.3. France
      • 10.2.2.4. Italy
      • 10.2.2.5. Spain
      • 10.2.2.6. Poland
      • 10.2.2.7. Russia
      • 10.2.2.8. Rest of Europe
    • 10.2.3. Asia Pacific
      • 10.2.3.1. China
      • 10.2.3.2. India
      • 10.2.3.3. Japan
      • 10.2.3.4. South Korea
      • 10.2.3.5. Australia & New Zealand
      • 10.2.3.6. ASEAN
        • 10.2.3.6.1. Malaysia
        • 10.2.3.6.2. Singapore
        • 10.2.3.6.3. Thailand
        • 10.2.3.6.4. Indonesia
        • 10.2.3.6.5. Philippines
        • 10.2.3.6.6. Vietnam
        • 10.2.3.6.7. Rest of ASEAN
      • 10.2.3.7. Rest of Asia Pacific
    • 10.2.4. Middle East & Africa
      • 10.2.4.1. UAE
      • 10.2.4.2. Saudi Arabia
      • 10.2.4.3. South Africa
      • 10.2.4.4. Rest of MEA
    • 10.2.5. South America
      • 10.2.5.1. Argentina
      • 10.2.5.2. Brazil
      • 10.2.5.3. Rest of South America

Chapter 11. North America Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 11.1. Key Insights
  • 11.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 11.2.1. By Test Method
    • 11.2.2. By Product Type
    • 11.2.3. By Technology
    • 11.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 11.2.5. By End User
    • 11.2.6. By Country

Chapter 12. Europe Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 12.1. Key Insights
  • 12.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 12.2.1. By Test Method
    • 12.2.2. By Product Type
    • 12.2.3. By Technology
    • 12.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 12.2.5. By End User
    • 12.2.6. By Country

Chapter 13. Asia Pacific Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 13.1. Key Insights
  • 13.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 13.2.1. By Test Method
    • 13.2.2. By Product Type
    • 13.2.3. By Technology
    • 13.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 13.2.5. By End User
    • 13.2.6. By Country

Chapter 14. Middle East & Africa Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 14.1. Key Insights
  • 14.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 14.2.1. By Test Method
    • 14.2.2. By Product Type
    • 14.2.3. By Technology
    • 14.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 14.2.5. By End User
    • 14.2.6. By Country

Chapter 15. South America Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 15.1. Key Insights
  • 15.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 15.2.1. By Test Method
    • 15.2.2. By Product Type
    • 15.2.3. By Technology
    • 15.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 15.2.5. By End User
    • 15.2.6. By Country

Chapter 16. The U.S. Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 16.1. Key Insights
  • 16.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 16.2.1. By Test Method
    • 16.2.2. By Product Type
    • 16.2.3. By Technology
    • 16.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 16.2.5. By End User

Chapter 17. Canada Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 17.1. Key Insights
  • 17.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 17.2.1. By Test Method
    • 17.2.2. By Product Type
    • 17.2.3. By Technology
    • 17.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 17.2.5. By End User

Chapter 18. Mexico Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 18.1. Key Insights
  • 18.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 18.2.1. By Test Method
    • 18.2.2. By Product Type
    • 18.2.3. By Technology
    • 18.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 18.2.5. By End User

Chapter 19. The UK Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 19.1. Key Insights
  • 19.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 19.2.1. By Test Method
    • 19.2.2. By Product Type
    • 19.2.3. By Technology
    • 19.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 19.2.5. By End User

Chapter 20. Germany Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 20.1. Key Insights
  • 20.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 20.2.1. By Test Method
    • 20.2.2. By Product Type
    • 20.2.3. By Technology
    • 20.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 20.2.5. By End User

Chapter 21. France Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 21.1. Key Insights
  • 21.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 21.2.1. By Test Method
    • 21.2.2. By Product Type
    • 21.2.3. By Technology
    • 21.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 21.2.5. By End User

Chapter 22. Italy Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 22.1. Key Insights
  • 22.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 22.2.1. By Test Method
    • 22.2.2. By Product Type
    • 22.2.3. By Technology
    • 22.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 22.2.5. By End User

Chapter 23. Spain Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 23.1. Key Insights
  • 23.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 23.2.1. By Test Method
    • 23.2.2. By Product Type
    • 23.2.3. By Technology
    • 23.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 23.2.5. By End User

Chapter 24. Poland Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 24.1. Key Insights
  • 24.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 24.2.1. By Test Method
    • 24.2.2. By Product Type
    • 24.2.3. By Technology
    • 24.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 24.2.5. By End User

Chapter 25. Russia Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 25.1. Key Insights
  • 25.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 25.2.1. By Test Method
    • 25.2.2. By Product Type
    • 25.2.3. By Technology
    • 25.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 25.2.5. By End User

Chapter 26. Rest of Europe Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 26.1. Key Insights
  • 26.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 26.2.1. By Test Method
    • 26.2.2. By Product Type
    • 26.2.3. By Technology
    • 26.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 26.2.5. By End User

Chapter 27. China Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 27.1. Key Insights
  • 27.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 27.2.1. By Test Method
    • 27.2.2. By Product Type
    • 27.2.3. By Technology
    • 27.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 27.2.5. By End User

Chapter 28. India Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 28.1. Key Insights
  • 28.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 28.2.1. By Test Method
    • 28.2.2. By Product Type
    • 28.2.3. By Technology
    • 28.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 28.2.5. By End User

Chapter 29. Japan Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 29.1. Key Insights
  • 29.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 29.2.1. By Test Method
    • 29.2.2. By Product Type
    • 29.2.3. By Technology
    • 29.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 29.2.5. By End User

Chapter 30. South Korea Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 30.1. Key Insights
  • 30.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 30.2.1. By Test Method
    • 30.2.2. By Product Type
    • 30.2.3. By Technology
    • 30.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 30.2.5. By End User

Chapter 31. Australia & New Zealand Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 31.1. Key Insights
  • 31.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 31.2.1. By Test Method
    • 31.2.2. By Product Type
    • 31.2.3. By Technology
    • 31.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 31.2.5. By End User

Chapter 32. ASEAN Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 32.1. Key Insights
  • 32.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 32.2.1. By Test Method
    • 32.2.2. By Product Type
    • 32.2.3. By Technology
    • 32.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 32.2.5. By End User

Chapter 33. Rest of APAC Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 33.1. Key Insights
  • 33.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 33.2.1. By Test Method
    • 33.2.2. By Product Type
    • 33.2.3. By Technology
    • 33.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 33.2.5. By End User

Chapter 34. UAE Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 34.1. Key Insights
  • 34.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 34.2.1. By Test Method
    • 34.2.2. By Product Type
    • 34.2.3. By Technology
    • 34.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 34.2.5. By End User

Chapter 35. Saudi Arabia Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

35.1. Key Insights

  • 35.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 35.2.1. By Test Method
    • 35.2.2. By Product Type
    • 35.2.3. By Technology
    • 35.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 35.2.5. By End User

Chapter 36. South Africa Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 36.1. Key Insights
  • 36.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 36.2.1. By Test Method
    • 36.2.2. By Product Type
    • 36.2.3. By Technology
    • 36.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 36.2.5. By End User

Chapter 37.Rest of MEA Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 37.1. Key Insights
  • 37.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 37.2.1. By Test Method
    • 37.2.2. By Product Type
    • 37.2.3. By Technology
    • 37.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 37.2.5. By End User

Chapter 38. Argentina Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 38.1. Key Insights
  • 38.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 38.2.1. By Test Method
    • 38.2.2. By Product Type
    • 38.2.3. By Technology
    • 38.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 38.2.5. By End User

Chapter 39. Brazil Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 39.1. Key Insights
  • 39.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 39.2.1. By Test Method
    • 39.2.2. By Product Type
    • 39.2.3. By Technology
    • 39.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 39.2.5. By End User

Chapter 40. Rest of South America Food Safety Testing Market Analysis

  • 40.1. Key Insights
  • 40.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020 - 2033 (US$ Bn)
    • 40.2.1. By Test Method
    • 40.2.2. By Product Type
    • 40.2.3. By Technology
    • 40.2.4. By Service Sourcing
    • 40.2.5. By End User

Chapter 41. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, and Business Strategy Outlook)

  • 41.1. ALS
  • 41.2. Biomerieux
  • 41.3. Eurofins Scientific
  • 41.4. Intertek Group plc
  • 41.5. Merck KGaA
  • 41.6. Merieux NutriSciences
  • 41.7. NSF
  • 41.8. SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA
  • 41.9. Symbio Labs
  • 41.10. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • 41.11. TUV SUD
  • 41.12. Other Prominent Players

Chapter 42. Annexurex

  • 42.1. List of Secondary Sources
  • 42.2. Key Country Markets- Macro Economic Outlook/Indicators
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!