PUBLISHER: DelveInsight | PRODUCT CODE: 1340026
PUBLISHER: DelveInsight | PRODUCT CODE: 1340026
DelveInsight's "Inflammatory myositis (IM)- Market Insights, Epidemiology and Market Forecast- 2032" report delivers an in-depth understanding of the Inflammatory myositis, historical and forecasted epidemiology as well as the Inflammatory myositis market trends in the United States, EU4 (Germany, Spain, Italy, and France) and the United Kingdom, and Japan.
Inflammatory myositis (IM) market report provides current treatment practices, emerging drug, market size and market share of the individual therapies, current and forecasted 7MM from 2019 to 2032. The report also covers current inflammatory myositis treatment practices/algorithms and unmet medical needs to curate the best of the opportunities and assesses the underlying potential of the market.
Study Period: 2019-2032.
The term myositis refers to a condition where there is inflammation of muscle. In practice, myositis tends to be associated with the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IMM): polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), juvenile dermatomyositis, overlap myositis, and inclusion body myositis (IBM). In contrast, myopathy refers to any abnormal condition or disease of muscle and, by definition, includes myositis.
Myositis is a rare condition that can affect multiple organs apart from muscles and often leads to severe impairment of the quality of life. According to the American College of Rheumatology, inflammatory myopathies are muscle diseases caused by inflammation. Myopathy is a general term used to describe several conditions affecting the muscles. They are autoimmune diseases where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks its muscles. The most common inflammatory myopathies are dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
Diagnosing myopathies involves a laboratory evaluation, imaging studies, multidisciplinary consultations, histologic examination, and potentially genetic studies. To properly diagnose the patient with muscle weakness, testing should include a thorough history and physical examination, routine laboratory tests (complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, muscle enzymes, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and other targeted studies as necessary), autoimmune serologies, imaging studies, neurologic evaluation, EMG, nerve conduction velocities and muscle biopsy. The history and physical examination allow the patient to describe the onset of the disease.
The treatment landscape for inflammatory myositis (including dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis) involves a combination of medications and supportive therapies. The specific treatment approach may vary depending on the individual's symptoms, disease severity, and response to previous treatments. Some common treatment options are:
Corticosteroids: High-dose corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are often the first-line treatment for inflammatory myositis. They help reduce inflammation and suppress the immune response. The dosage is typically gradually reduced to find the lowest effective dose.
Immunosuppressants: Immunosuppressant medications may be added if corticosteroids are insufficient or long-term corticosteroid use is not desirable. Examples include methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporine. These drugs work by suppressing the immune system and reducing inflammation.
Biologic agents: In some cases, biologic agents may be used for more severe or refractory cases of inflammatory myositis. Rituximab, for example, targets specific immune cells involved in the disease process. Other biologics, such as tocilizumab or abatacept, may also be considered in certain cases.
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG): IVIG is a treatment option for some individuals with dermatomyositis or polymyositis who do not respond to other therapies. It involves infusions of immunoglobulin to modulate the immune system.
It is important to note that the inclusion body myositis (IBM) treatment is particularly challenging, as it is generally less responsive to immunosuppressive therapies. Currently, no specific treatment can stop or reverse the progression of IBM; however, supportive therapies, physical therapy, and management of symptoms can help improve quality of life.
A high unmet need prevails in the current therapies for treating Inflammatory myositis as current treatment approaches for inflammatory myositis typically involve immunosuppressive medications such as corticosteroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these therapies are not always effective for all patients, and some individuals may experience inadequate response or significant side effects.
To cater to their needs, many molecules are in the pipeline to treat Inflammatory myositis patients across the 7MM. Some major products are anticipated to hit the market during 2023-2032, including Efgartigimod alfa, Ravulizumab, Brepocitinib, PF-06823859, and Hizentra.
As the market is derived using a patient-based model, the Inflammatory myositis epidemiology chapter in the report provides historical as well as forecasted epidemiology segmented by total diagnosed prevalent cases of Inflammatory myositis, type-specific diagnosed prevalent cases of Inflammatory myositis, gender-specific diagnosed prevalent cases of Inflammatory myositis, and age-specific diagnosed prevalent cases of Inflammatory myositis in the 7MM covering, the United States, EU4 countries (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain), United Kingdom, and Japan from 2019 to 2032.
The drug chapter segment of the inflammatory myositis report encloses a detailed analysis of Inflammatory myositis late-stage and mid-stage (Phase-III and Phase-II) pipeline drug. It also helps to understand the Inflammatory myositis clinical trial details, expressive pharmacological action, agreements and collaborations, approval and patent details, advantages and disadvantages of each included drug, and the latest news and press releases.
Efgartigimod, an experimental antibody fragment, is specifically designed to target the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and is considered a pioneering treatment option. It is currently undergoing evaluation for its potential to treat patients who suffer from inflammatory myositis, a severe autoimmune disease. These patients have confirmed levels of pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies, and there is a significant lack of effective medical solutions for their condition.
PF-06823859, an investigational drug developed by Pfizer, is currently in Phase II developmental stages as a potential treatment for moderate-to-severe dermatomyositis and lupus. This drug candidate is categorized as a new biological entity (NBE) and is a humanized immunoglobulin-neutralizing antibody. It is administered via IV and SC injection and works by specifically targeting interferon beta 1 (IFNB1), a key cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases.
Detailed emerging therapies list will be provided in the final report.
The treatment landscape for inflammatory myositis has evolved over the years. Current treatment approaches involve a combination of immunosuppressive medications, such as corticosteroids and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) i.e. immunosuppressive agents, biologic agents, physical therapy, and supportive measures. However, there is still an unmet need for more effective and targeted therapies with fewer side effects. The development of novel treatments, including biologics and small molecule inhibitors, could significantly impact the market outlook by offering new options for patients.
The effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as the initial treatment for patients diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. First-line IVIg monotherapy demonstrated effectiveness in approximately 50% of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. In most cases, treatment response was achieved within three weeks of initiating IVIg therapy among those who responded positively. If treatment with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and IVIG fails to alleviate symptoms, IV cyclophosphamide can be considered as a fourth-line treatment. However, it is associated with potential severe side effects and is typically reserved for patients with severe refractory disease, such as profound muscle weakness, swallowing difficulties, and interstitial lung disease. Treatment plans may vary depending on the individual's specific condition, disease severity, response to treatment, and the expertise of the treating physician.
In light of the above, some developmental initiatives have been taken toward the management of IM. The condition may evolve as some interesting therapies are heading down the pipeline. This would encourage reimbursement scenarios, doctors' adoption, and patient compliance. Some companies have initiated clinical trials investigating new treatment options, including Argenx (Efgartigimod), CSL Behring (Hizentra), Pfizer (PF-06823859), Priovant Therapeutics (Beprocitinib), and Alexion Pharmaceuticals (Ravulizumab) as the potential therapies lined up for forecast in the 7MM in the DelveInsight therapeutics market model.
This section focuses on the rate of uptake of the potential drug expected to get launched in the market during the study period 2019-2032. For example, we estimate that both drug (efgartigimod, Ravulizumab, Brepocitinib, PF-06823859, and Hizentra) will be launched in the year 2028, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2025 in the US, respectively. The drugs are under development in the Phase II or III stage.
The report provides insights into different therapeutic candidates in Phase III, Phase II, and Phase I stage. It also analyzes key players involved in developing targeted therapeutics.
The report covers detailed information on collaborations, acquisition and merger, licensing, and patent details for Inflammatory myositis emerging therapies.
To keep up with current market trends, we take KOLs and SMEs' opinions working in the domain through primary research to fill the data gaps and validate our secondary research. Industry Experts contacted for insights on Inflammatory myositis evolving treatment landscape, patient reliance on conventional therapies, patient's therapy switching acceptability, drug uptake along with challenges related to accessibility, include the Division of Rheumatology at the University of California in Irvine, USA; Division of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical School, USA; Department of Medical Biotechnology, Berlin, Germany; University Paris-Saclay, France; Centre for Biomedical Investigation Network, Barcelona, Spain; Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan, and Others.
DelveInsight's analysts connected with 50+ KOLs to gather insights, however, interviews were conducted with 15+ KOLs in the 7MM. Centers such as the Department of Rheumatology, Department of Immunology, etc. were contacted. Their opinion helps to understand and validate current and emerging therapies and treatment patterns or Inflammatory myositis market trends. This will support the clients in potential upcoming novel treatments by identifying the overall scenario of the market and the unmet needs.
We perform Qualitative and market Intelligence analysis using various approaches, such as SWOT analysis, and Conjoint Analysis. In the SWOT analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in terms of disease diagnosis, patient awareness, patient burden, competitive landscape, cost-effectiveness, and geographical accessibility of therapies are provided. These pointers are based on the Analyst's discretion and assessment of the patient burden, cost analysis, and existing and evolving treatment landscape.
Conjoint Analysis is done to analyze multiple approved and emerging therapies based on relevant attributes such as safety, efficacy, frequency of administration, route of administration, and order of entry. Scoring is given based on these parameters to analyze the effectiveness of therapy. In efficacy, the trial's primary and secondary outcome measures are evaluated.
Further, the safety of the drug is evaluated wherein the acceptability, tolerability, and adverse events are majorly observed, and it sets a clear understanding of the side effects posed by the drug in the trials. In addition, the scoring is also based on the route of administration, order of entry and designation, probability of success, and the addressable patient pool for each therapy. According to these parameters, the final weightage score and the ranking of the emerging therapies are decided.
The report further provides detailed insights on the country-wise accessibility and reimbursement scenarios, cost-effectiveness scenario of approved therapies, programs making accessibility easier and out-of-pocket costs more affordable, insights on patients insured under federal or state government prescription drug programs, etc.