Picture

Questions?

+1-866-353-3335

SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1847169

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1847169

Bioabsorbable Trauma Fixation Market Size, Share, & Trends Analysis | Global | 2025-2031

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 35 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PDF, Downloadable Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Single User License)
USD 4995
PDF, Downloadable Excel & 1 Year Online Access (2-5 User License)
USD 6995
PDF, Downloadable Excel & 1 Year Online Access (Corporate License)
USD 8995

Add to Cart

The global bioabsorbable fixation market was valued at $47.2 million in 2024. The market is projected to decrease at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -1.0%, reaching $43.8 million by 2031.

This report covers the complete suite of products within the bioabsorbable fixation segment, including pins, screws, and fixation devices composed of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) polymers. These devices are designed for the stabilization of fractures, osteotomies, bone grafts, and fusions, as well as for the reattachment of ligaments, tendons, meniscal tears, and other soft tissue structures.

The analysis includes unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares, along with detailed coverage of market drivers and limiters, procedure volumes, recent mergers and acquisitions, competitive analysis, and technology trends. Historical data is provided to 2021, with forecasts through 2031.

Market Overview

Bioabsorbable fixation devices are engineered to provide temporary stabilization and mechanical support during the healing process of bone and soft tissue. Unlike metal implants, they gradually degrade and are absorbed by the body, eliminating the need for implant removal. This unique advantage continues to attract research and clinical interest despite limited large-bone applications and competitive pressure from established metallic systems.

Currently, bioabsorbable fixation is most widely used in small-bone trauma, craniofacial reconstruction, and soft-tissue repair procedures, where the biomechanical demands are moderate. The market's modest decline in overall value reflects slower product adoption and persistent limitations in mechanical strength relative to metallic alternatives. However, the introduction of next-generation bioabsorbable materials with improved biocompatibility, mechanical durability, and controlled degradation profiles is expected to offset part of the decline and maintain market stability through the forecast period.

The industry continues to explore polymer blends and composite materials, combining PLA, PGA, and calcium-based fillers to balance strength, flexibility, and resorption time. These material innovations are expected to broaden indications and enhance confidence among surgeons who have historically favored metal fixation systems.

Although the market remains niche compared with titanium and stainless-steel fixation, bioabsorbable technology offers clear procedural advantages. Its elimination of hardware removal surgeries, reduction in infection risks, and better integration with biological healing position it as an important segment of future orthopedic innovation.

As research progresses and smaller companies introduce optimized polymer formulations, the global market for bioabsorbable fixation devices is likely to find new opportunities in sports medicine, extremity surgery, and pediatric orthopedics.

Market Drivers

Product Range Expansion

A key driver for the bioabsorbable fixation market is the ongoing expansion of device types and material compositions. Current technology primarily supports small-diameter devices, such as pins and screws, used in small-joint and soft-tissue repair. These devices are ideal for low-load indications, but efforts are underway to improve strength and stiffness for use in larger bones and more demanding anatomical sites.

Developments in polymer processing and copolymer chemistry have helped overcome some of the soft-tissue reaction issues historically associated with bioabsorbable materials. As these challenges are mitigated, manufacturers can design larger implants capable of supporting greater load-bearing applications. These advancements not only broaden the clinical scope of bioabsorbable fixation but also increase the potential number of eligible patients, driving steady procedural adoption even as overall market value remains constrained.

Greater Flexibility and Clinical Utility

Bioabsorbable fixation devices offer surgeons greater flexibility in both definitive and temporary fixation procedures. For example, bioabsorbable pins can be used for bone fragment reduction without the need for subsequent removal. In cases such as calcaneal (heel bone) fractures, pins can be cut flush with the bone surface and left in place, allowing surgeons to proceed with secondary fixation using metallic plates if needed.

Because the bioabsorbable pins and screws are fully resorbed over time, surgeons are not concerned about residual hardware fragments that might otherwise require surgical removal. This feature simplifies procedures, reduces operative time, and minimizes post-surgical complications. As healthcare systems continue to value efficiency and shorter recovery times, these benefits enhance the appeal of bioabsorbable fixation in select indications.

Reduction in Required Surgery

One of the most recognized advantages of bioabsorbable fixation is its ability to eliminate the need for a second surgery for implant removal. For patients, this translates to reduced procedural risk, lower treatment costs, and improved satisfaction. From a clinical perspective, avoiding hardware removal reduces the chance of secondary trauma, infection, or complications related to scar tissue.

Patients and clinicians often perceive the temporary nature of bioabsorbable devices as a psychological benefit. The knowledge that the implant will not remain in the body indefinitely contributes to higher acceptance rates, particularly in younger and more active populations. As healthcare systems place growing emphasis on patient-centered outcomes and overall quality of life, this factor continues to support the segment's resilience.

Advancements in Material Science

Recent research into copolymer formulations and bio-composite materials has produced bioabsorbable implants with improved tensile strength, predictable resorption profiles, and biological integration. By incorporating elements such as calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite, developers aim to create materials that mimic natural bone behavior and promote osteoconduction during healing.

These innovations extend product lifespan under load while ensuring complete resorption within a clinically acceptable timeframe. The resulting devices provide the dual benefits of mechanical stability during healing and gradual replacement by natural bone, reducing long-term complications. Such advancements are anticipated to drive renewed interest and incremental value growth in select subsegments.

Market Limiters

Inadequate Product Strength

A primary limitation of bioabsorbable fixation devices remains their lower mechanical strength compared to metal implants. The resorption process, while beneficial in avoiding removal surgery, simultaneously reduces the long-term load-bearing capacity of the implant. For this reason, bioabsorbable devices are generally restricted to low-stress applications, such as small bone fractures or soft-tissue fixation, rather than large long-bone fractures.

In severe trauma cases, the use of bioabsorbable fixation can lead to insufficient stabilization, increasing the risk of malunion or delayed healing. The market's limited penetration in major fracture care reflects this clinical constraint. To address the issue, some manufacturers are developing biocomposite devices that combine resorbable polymers with ceramic fillers, offering enhanced strength at the cost of slower absorption and higher brittleness.

Limited Surgeon Familiarity

Surgeon familiarity and training continue to act as barriers to broader adoption. The majority of orthopedic surgeons have extensive experience with metallic fixation systems and are proficient in both implant placement and subsequent hardware removal. In contrast, bioabsorbable devices often require different instrumentation, insertion techniques, and handling characteristics.

Many surgeons remain cautious due to the learning curve and the lack of long-term data compared to established metal systems. Additionally, since implant removal procedures are a known and reimbursable part of standard care, there is less financial incentive for practitioners to switch to alternatives that eliminate these follow-up interventions.

High Costs

While bioabsorbable fixation offers clinical and patient-centric benefits, cost remains a significant barrier. Bioabsorbable implants are typically more expensive than their metal counterparts, despite serving similar or smaller indications. Hospitals and surgical centers operating under cost constraints may be reluctant to stock these products unless specific patient or procedural advantages can be clearly demonstrated.

Furthermore, given the reliability and lower cost of metal screws and plates, surgeons have limited motivation to adopt higher-priced bioabsorbable alternatives, especially when the perceived improvement in outcomes is marginal. This cost differential continues to limit penetration, particularly in cost-sensitive healthcare markets across Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and parts of Europe.

Regulatory and Manufacturing Challenges

The production of bioabsorbable devices involves complex polymer synthesis, sterilization, and molding processes that are sensitive to heat and humidity. Achieving consistent quality, predictable degradation rates, and mechanical strength requires stringent process control and advanced manufacturing infrastructure. Regulatory pathways, especially under newer frameworks such as Europe's MDR, demand extensive preclinical and clinical validation, raising both development costs and time to market.

Smaller manufacturers often face challenges meeting these requirements, which constrains innovation and limits competitive diversity. As a result, the market remains concentrated among a few large companies with established research and regulatory capabilities.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

  • Time Frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025-2031, and historical data 2021-2023.
  • Care Settings: Hospitals, orthopedic and trauma centers, and ambulatory surgical facilities performing bone and soft-tissue repair procedures.
  • Methodology: Revenues are calculated as units X ASP, validated through primary interviews, hospital procurement data, and global import/export records.

Competitive Analysis

Arthrex held the leading position in the global bioabsorbable fixation market in 2024. The company's leadership stems from its strong presence in small-joint repair and sports medicine, where bioabsorbable fixation products are most commonly used. Arthrex's key offerings include the TRIM-IT(TM) line of pins and screws, BioComposite(TM) screws, and Bio-Compression pins and screws. The company's ongoing material development initiatives and wide procedural portfolio ensure it remains at the forefront of innovation in this category.

Zimmer Biomet ranked as the second-leading competitor, supported by its LactoSorb(R) Resorbable Fixation System. The product's mechanical reliability and biocompatibility have reinforced Zimmer Biomet's position across various fixation procedures, particularly in craniofacial and small-bone applications. Continued adoption of LactoSorb(R) and the company's investment in polymer technology are expected to sustain its competitive presence.

CONMED was the third-leading competitor in the market. Its SmartNail(R) and SmartPin(R) systems are recognized for efficient fracture stabilization and ease of use. Although CONMED has diversified its product focus beyond bioabsorbable fixation, its long-standing expertise in resorbable implant technology continues to contribute to market recognition and legacy sales in select regions.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

35 pages of detailed data and analysis.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary included.

Why This Report

What is driving adoption of next-generation bioabsorbable materials and in which surgical specialties they are gaining traction.

How will material innovation and improved mechanical performance influence future clinical applications.

Which factors are slowing penetration compared to metallic fixation systems, and where pricing pressures are most acute.

What company strategies are shaping the competitive landscape for small-joint and soft-tissue fixation.

How regulatory frameworks and manufacturing costs impact new product introductions and market entry.

The Global Bioabsorbable Fixation Market Report from iData Research provides a complete analysis of market size, competitive share, pricing trends, and procedural adoption across regions.

The study combines quantitative forecasting with qualitative insights to help manufacturers, investors, and distributors understand where opportunities and constraints exist within this niche but strategically important orthopedic segment.

Product Code: iDATA_GLTR25_BTF_MC

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
  • Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
  • Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
  • Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Bioabsorbable Fixation Market

  • 5.1 Executive Summary
    • 5.1.1 Global Bioabsorbable Fixation Market Overview
    • 5.1.2 Competitive Analysis
    • 5.1.3 Regions Included
  • 5.2 Introduction
  • 5.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 5.4 Drivers And Limiters
    • 5.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 5.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

Product Code: iDATA_GLTR25_BTF_MC

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 5-1: Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
  • Chart 5-2: Bioabsorbable Fixation Units Sold, Global, 2024
  • Chart 5-3: Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
  • Chart 5-4: Leading Competitors, Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 5-1: Bioabsorbable Fixation Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
  • Figure 5-2: Bioabsorbable Fixation Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
  • Figure 5-3: Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
  • Figure 5-4: Units Sold by Region, Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
  • Figure 5-5: Average Selling Price by Region, Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
  • Figure 5-6: Market Value by Region, Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
  • Figure 5-7: Leading Competitors, Bioabsorbable Fixation Market, Global, 2024
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!