What are you looking for?

Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us

Compare

Free Samples

Home Market Research Reports Medical Device

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1847187

PUBLISHER: iData Research Inc. | PRODUCT CODE: 1847187

Laparoscopic Devices Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis | United States | 2025-2031 | Includes: Laparoscopes, Access Devices, Closure Devices, and 8 mo

PUBLISHED: July 29, 2025

PAGES: 353 Pages

DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days

ADD TO COMPARE

SELECT AN OPTION

Please contact us using the inquiry form for pricing information.

List of Tables

The U.S. laparoscopic device market was valued at over $4.9 billion in 2024. The market is projected to reach nearly $5.9 billion by 2031.

This report suite covers laparoscopes, access devices, laparoscopic hand instruments, insufflation devices, suction-irrigation devices, direct energy devices, ultrasonic energy devices, hand-assisted laparoscopic sleeves, closure devices, gastric bands and balloons, powered morcellators, laparoscopic towers, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy.

The research quantifies unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, procedure numbers, and company shares. It also analyzes market drivers and limiters, acquisitions, product portfolios, and competitive positioning in hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers.

Market Overview

Laparoscopy is one of the most widely used minimally invasive techniques in U.S. surgery. It offers faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, fewer complications, and reduced surgical risk. These advantages keep a steady flow of procedures through general surgery, gynecology, urology, colorectal surgery, and bariatric programs. As training coverage improves, more surgeons perform core laparoscopic techniques as a default approach. This steady procedural base supports demand for access devices, hand instruments, energy platforms, insufflators, suction-irrigation systems, and towers.

At the same time, robotic-assisted surgery is expanding across large procedure families. U.S. volumes on the da Vinci platform rose from about 1,282,000 procedures in 2022 to about 1,532,000 in 2023 and about 1,757,000 in 2024.

General surgery was the largest and fastest-growing area with about 1,063,000 procedures in 2024. Gynecology contributed about 423,000 procedures and urology about 186,000 in 2024.

These trends partially offset growth for some traditional laparoscopic tools in high-volume procedures such as cholecystectomy, hernia repair, colorectal surgery, prostatectomy, and hysterectomy.

Even so, many facilities run both platforms side by side. Energy devices, closure systems, imaging, and towers are used in both laparoscopic and robotic approaches, which helps sustain value across categories.

Product design continues to evolve. New 5-mm and deflective tip laparoscopes, 3D visualization, and ergonomic hand instruments support precision and reduce fatigue. Direct energy and ultrasonic platforms add reliable sealing and dissection with fewer instrument exchanges. In closure, staplers remain key drivers of value because they allow controlled cutting and sealing in a single device and fit well into standard procedure kits.

Market Drivers

Laparoscopic procedure adoption and training. Laparoscopy's clinical benefits drive hospital adoption and residency coverage. More surgeons become comfortable with access techniques and energy-assisted dissection, which lifts demand for trocars, hand instruments, and closure. As training spreads and equipment standardizes, case times become more predictable and throughput improves.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy growth. Global da Vinci procedures increased to about 2,683,000 in 2024 from about 2,286,000 in 2022. In the United States, growth to about 1,757,000 cases in 2024 came from general surgery, gynecology, and urology. Robotic growth shifts some demand away from individual laparoscopic instruments, but it sustains or increases consumption of energy devices, stapling, and visualization components that are used across platforms.

Technology development in visualization. New 5-mm rigid scopes, deflective tip scopes, and 3D systems reduce eye strain, prevent horizon loss, and keep consistent focus across planes. Better visualization supports accurate tissue handling and reduces errors. Advanced towers that integrate imaging, recording, and light sources help standardize operating rooms.

Energy platform upgrades. Direct energy systems and ultrasonic instruments allow precise sealing and dissection. These tools can replace certain hand instrument tasks and reduce instrument exchanges. Hospitals value the combination of reliability, fewer bleeds, and shorter operative time.

Closure device performance. Stapling platforms continue to lead growth within closure. Surgeons rely on reload variety, staple line control, and ergonomic staplers to handle bowel, lung, and soft tissue. Reloads and circular devices are in steady use in colorectal and other procedures.

Reusable and reposable strategies. Cost-conscious facilities favor reusable and reposable models where they reduce lifetime cost without sacrificing performance. This supports demand for durable hand instruments, energy generators, and reposable tips that align with sustainability goals and supply resilience.

Market Limiters

Robotic platform substitution. Robotic-assisted systems offer improved articulation, stable camera control, and ergonomic benefits. As programs shift hernia repair, colorectal resections, prostatectomy, and hysterectomy to robotic platforms, growth in some traditional laparoscopic categories slows. Facilities still purchase laparoscopic sets, but case mix changes influence instrument pull-through and refresh cycles.

Learning curves and staffing. Laparoscopic learning curves vary by procedure. Appendectomy may require 20 to 30 cases to reach stability, while colorectal procedures can require 30 to 70 cases or more. Facilities must invest in training for both laparoscopic and robotic approaches, which can delay the pace of new technology adoption.

Capital pressure and waste management choices. Hospitals face budget constraints and careful review of capital projects. Advanced suction-irrigation and waste management systems compete with multi-specialty solutions that promise lower total cost. Price pressure can slow upgrades to pumps and fluid handling even when features are attractive.

Product overlap. Direct energy devices can displace certain hand instruments and some closure steps, which reduces unit volume in those categories. Vendors respond by offering packages and training that match devices to procedure steps.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, average selling prices, and procedure numbers.

Qualitative coverage. Market growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, FDA clearances and recalls where applicable, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews that shape demand.

Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.

Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory data, hospital procurement inputs, import and export records, and the iData Research internal database.

Method note. Revenues are modeled as units multiplied by ASP and validated against procedure volumes, installed base, and site-of-care mix.

Markets Covered and Segmentation

Laparoscope Market

Device type. Rigid, flexible, lens antifog solution.

Access Device Market

Device type. Trocar, single port access device.

Hand Instrument Market

Device type. Reusable, disposable, reposable, articulating.

Insufflation Device Market

Device type. Insufflator, insufflator tubing, Veress needle.

Suction-Irrigation Device Market

Device type. Disposable kit, reusable tip, suction-irrigation pump.

Direct Energy Device Market

Device type. Monopolar, bipolar, electrosurgical generator.

Ultrasonic Device Market

Device type. Instrument, generator.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Sleeve Market

Closure Device Market

Device type. Laparoscopic stapler, endosuturing device, clip applier.

Gastric Device Market

Device type. Band, balloon.

Powered Morcellator Market

Device type. Disposable, reposable.

Laparoscopic Tower Market

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy Market

Competitive Analysis

Medtronic remained a leading player in 2024 with substantial shares in direct energy, closure, ultrasonic, and access devices. The Valleylab energy platform and LigaSure vessel sealing systems performed well in both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted settings. The company's portfolio depth supports cross-segment efficiencies and responds to shifts in case mix. An emphasis on reusable and reposable options aligns with cost control and sustainability goals. Medtronic is one of the few manufacturers with established presence in both traditional and robotic ecosystems, which supports account retention.

Ethicon reinforced leadership in closure and ultrasonic devices in 2024, driven by Harmonic and Enseal platforms. Its presence in direct energy and access devices supports a broad surgical portfolio. Ethicon's ergonomic designs and integrated energy strategies fit hospital goals for cohesive operating room systems. Backed by investments in robotic technologies and dual-energy platforms, Ethicon is positioned for continued growth as minimally invasive and cross-compatible solutions expand. Strong group purchasing relationships support loyalty and stability.

Stryker sustained leadership in insufflation and suction-irrigation in 2024 and held solid positions in towers and laparoscopes. Diagnostic visualization sales frequently led to multi-product purchases across cameras, towers, and instruments, which created cross-selling momentum. While Stryker is less dominant in energy, its strengths in operating room integration and image-guided visualization support durable share. Its focus on user-friendly consoles and waste management systems addresses workflow and safety needs in both inpatient and outpatient sites.

Other manufacturers participate across access devices, hand instruments, and visualization with strategies that highlight coating performance, ergonomic grips, reprocessing support, and service packages that fit system-wide standards.

Technology and Practice Trends

3D and deflective visualization. Upgrades to rigid 5-mm scopes, deflective tips, and 3D visualization reduce eye strain and improve orientation. Clear planes and consistent focus improve decision-making and may shorten operative times in complex dissections.

Energy consolidation. Direct energy platforms and ultrasonic instruments reduce the need to switch tools during key steps. This can lower instrument counts per case and standardize trays. Hospitals favor reliable seals and precise thermal spread control.

Stapling momentum. Reload options and circular designs support a wide range of gastrointestinal procedures. Ease of use and controlled staple lines help teams maintain consistent outcomes and schedule predictability.

Reusable and reposable economics. Facilities seek durable instruments and reposable tips where life-cycle cost is favorable. Vendors that provide clear reprocessing guidance and service support gain an advantage in cost-contained environments.

Robotic coexistence. Many sites operate both laparoscopic and robotic programs. Energy platforms, staplers, and visualization are common denominators. Training focuses on team roles, instrument handoff, and turnover time to meet throughput targets.

Care Settings

Coverage includes academic centers, community hospitals, and ambulatory surgery centers. Case mix varies by site. Hospitals handle complex colorectal, bariatric, and oncologic cases with higher demand for stapling, advanced energy, and visualization.

Ambulatory centers focus on day surgery such as hernia repair and cholecystectomy with an emphasis on efficient turnover and predictable recovery.

Both settings value supplies that are simple to set up, easy to reprocess where applicable, and backed by consistent service.

Market Dynamics by Category

Access devices and trocars. Demand tracks overall lap volume. Single port access is used selectively, while multiport remains standard. Performance factors include seal integrity, ease of insertion, and compatibility with 5-mm and 12-mm instruments.

Hand instruments. Reusable and reposable models compete on durability, balance, and modular tips. Disposable sets are used where infection control policies or turnover targets favor single-use.

Insufflation and suction-irrigation. Modern insufflators aim for stable pneumoperitoneum and smoke evacuation compatibility. Suction-irrigation pumps and kits are more common in longer procedures and with complex adhesiolysis.

Direct energy and ultrasonic devices. Hospitals choose based on seal reliability, speed, and generator compatibility. The ability to share power platforms across laparoscopic and robotic cases supports standardization.

Closure devices. Staplers lead on versatility, reload choice, and ease of articulation. Endosuturing devices and clip appliers remain important for targeted steps and cost control.

Gastric bands and balloons. Use is selective within bariatric programs, with demand influenced by patient selection and non-device treatment pathways.

Powered morcellation. Adoption is governed by safety protocols and indication selection, with reposable designs used where policies allow.

Towers and imaging. Bundled deals that pair scopes, cameras, light sources, and recording software are common. Reliability and image quality drive preference.

Geography

This edition covers the United States.

Why This Report

Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within the U.S. laparoscopic device market, and how do access devices, hand instruments, energy platforms, closure devices, visualization, and towers each contribute to value through 2031.

How does robotic-assisted laparoscopy change demand, and which product lines benefit from cross-platform use such as energy generators, stapling, and visualization that support both approaches.

What forces will shape the market going forward, including procedure growth in general surgery, gynecology, urology, and colorectal, and the impact of training pipelines and staffing on adoption speed.

Which visualization upgrades matter most, including 5-mm scopes, deflective tips, and 3D systems, and how do these changes influence tower refresh cycles and scope handling.

How should hospitals plan instrument trays, balancing reusable, reposable, and disposable models to meet infection control, cost, and turnover requirements.

The U.S. laparoscopic device market report from iData Research answers these questions with segment and site models, company share analysis, pricing detail, and coverage that links technique and platform choices to device consumption.

Use it to size opportunities by category, plan product roadmaps, align contracting with hospital goals, and set targets for service and training that improve consistency across operating rooms.

Product Code: iDATA_USLAP25_MS

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

U.S. Laparoscopic Device Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Emerging Markets And Technologies

Market Developments

Market Trends

Procedure Codes Investigated

Procedure Segmentation

Market Segmentation

Key Report Updates

Version History

Research Methodology

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

U.S. Laparoscopic Device Market Overview

3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
3.3 Drivers And Limiters
- 3.3.1 Market Drivers
- 3.3.2 Market Limiters
3.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
3.5 Mergers And Acquisitions

Procedure Numbers

4.1 Introduction
4.2 Procedure Number Overview
- 4.2.1 Procedures Numbers By Approach
  - 4.2.1.1 Open And Laparoscopic Procedures
  - 4.2.1.2 Open Procedures By Indication
  - 4.2.1.3 Laparoscopic Procedures By Indication
4.3 Open And Laparoscopic Procedures By Indication
- 4.3.1 Gastric Band Procedures
  - 4.3.1.1 Gastric Band Procedures By Placement/Removal
  - 4.3.1.2 Inpatient Gastric Band Procedures By Placement/Removal
  - 4.3.1.3 Outpatient Gastric Band Procedures By Placement/Removal
- 4.3.2 Gastric Balloon Procedures
- 4.3.3 Gastric Bypass Procedures
  - 4.3.3.1 Gastric Bypass Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.3.2 Inpatient Gastric Bypass Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.3.3 Outpatient Gastric Bypass Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.4 Sleeve Gastrectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.4.1 Sleeve Gastrectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.4.2 Inpatient Sleeve Gastrectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.4.3 Outpatient Sleeve Gastrectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.5 Anti-Reflux Procedures
  - 4.3.5.1 Anti-Reflux Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.5.2 Inpatient Anti-Reflux Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.5.3 Outpatient Anti-Reflux Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.6 Colectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.6.1 Colectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.6.2 Inpatient Colectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.6.3 Outpatient Colectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.7 Cholecystectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.7.1 Cholecystectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.7.2 Inpatient Cholecystectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.7.3 Outpatient Cholecystectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.8 Nephrectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.8.1 Nephrectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.8.2 Inpatient Nephrectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.8.3 Outpatient Nephrectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.9 Appendectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.9.1 Appendectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.9.2 Inpatient Appendectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.9.3 Outpatient Appendectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.10 Adrenalectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.10.1 Adrenalectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.10.2 Inpatient Adrenalectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.10.3 Outpatient Adrenalectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.11 Hernia Repair Procedures
  - 4.3.11.1 Hernia Repair Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.11.2 Inpatient Hernia Repair Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.11.3 Outpatient Hernia Repair Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.12 Hysterectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.12.1 Hysterectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.12.2 Inpatient Hysterectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.12.3 Outpatient Hysterectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.13 Myomectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.13.1 Myomectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.13.2 Inpatient Myomectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.13.3 Outpatient Myomectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.14 Prostatectomy Procedures
  - 4.3.14.1 Prostatectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.14.2 Inpatient Prostatectomy Procedures By Approach
  - 4.3.14.3 Outpatient Prostatectomy Procedures By Approach
- 4.3.15 Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (Vats)
  - 4.3.15.1 Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (Vats) Procedures By Setting
- 4.3.16 Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Procedures
  - 4.3.16.1 Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Procedures By Setting