Packaged Food

PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 1829451

PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 1829451

Non-Thermal Processing Market by Product Type, Technology, Food Form, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032

PUBLISHED: September 30, 2025

PAGES: 184 Pages

DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days

ADD TO COMPARE

SELECT AN OPTION

List of Tables

The Non-Thermal Processing Market is projected to grow by USD 2.99 billion at a CAGR of 9.44% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 1.45 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 1.58 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 2.99 billion
CAGR (%)	9.44%

A forward looking introduction that frames non thermal processing as a strategic imperative for preserving quality and safety while meeting evolving consumer demands

Non-thermal processing has moved from niche experimentation to a central pillar of innovation in food and beverage manufacturing. Advances in technologies such as high pressure processing, pulsed electric fields, and cold plasma are enabling manufacturers to balance safety, shelf life, and sensory quality without relying solely on thermal interventions. As consumer preferences shift toward fresher-tasting and minimally processed products, non-thermal approaches are becoming critical levers for differentiation across dairy, fruit juices, meats, and seafood.

Regulatory attention, expanding application knowledge, and growing investments in processing equipment are converging to accelerate industrial adoption. Meanwhile, operators face complex integration challenges such as validating efficacy across diverse food matrices, addressing capital expenditure profiles, and ensuring compatibility with existing packaging and distribution systems. In response, cross-functional teams in product development, quality assurance, and operations are reevaluating process design principles to incorporate non-thermal steps that preserve nutritional and organoleptic attributes while meeting safety objectives.

Consequently, strategic planning now requires a nuanced assessment of technology fit by product type and food form, alignment with end user requirements, and proactive engagement with regulatory frameworks. This introductory overview sets the stage for deeper analysis of transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional nuances, competitive positioning, and pragmatic recommendations for leaders navigating the non-thermal landscape.

Key transformative shifts that are accelerating adoption of advanced non thermal technologies and reshaping product innovation supply chains and regulatory engagement

The landscape of non-thermal food processing is experiencing several transformative shifts that are reshaping R&D priorities, capital investment decisions, and supply chain architectures. First, technological maturation is broadening the applicability of methods such as high pressure processing and pulsed electric fields from laboratory validation to commercial scale lines. As a result, product developers are exploring combinations of technologies to address multi-hurdle preservation objectives, thereby improving shelf life and sensory outcomes without increasing thermal load.

Second, the commercial conversation is moving beyond singular product improvements to encompass portfolio-level benefits. For example, manufacturers of dairy products are now evaluating whether adopting non-thermal options for milk, yogurt, or cheese can reduce downstream processing variability and deliver consistent texture and flavor. Simultaneously, beverage producers focused on apple and orange juices are leveraging technologies that retain fresh taste profiles while ensuring microbial safety.

Third, supply chain integration is evolving as contract processors and food manufacturers seek modular, retrofit-capable systems that minimize downtime during installation. This shift is accelerating partnerships between equipment innovators and service providers, and it is stimulating business models centered on processing-as-a-service. Moreover, regulatory modernization efforts are prompting more structured validation frameworks, encouraging firms to invest in robust data generation and third-party verification to support commercialization and international trade.

How evolving United States tariff dynamics are altering equipment procurement strategies supply chain resilience and deployment timelines across non thermal processing initiatives

Tariff policies in the United States have introduced new dynamics that influence the operational and strategic calculus for organizations involved in non-thermal processing. Changes in import duties and related trade measures affect the cost basis for specialized equipment, spare parts, and ancillary components that are frequently sourced from international suppliers. As capital acquisition costs shift, procurement teams and financial planners are reassessing total cost of ownership models, factoring in not only purchase price but also maintenance, calibration, and lifecycle replacement expenses.

In addition to equipment procurement, tariff variances impact cross-border service models and aftermarket support. Firms that previously relied on international field service teams may reconfigure maintenance contracts, pursue localization of key skills, or develop alternative supply arrangements to mitigate lead time risk. Importantly, these adjustments can lead to longer qualification timelines for new installations, particularly when OEM parts or certified consumables are delayed by customs processes.

Consequently, organizations are recalibrating implementation roadmaps to balance speed to market with supply chain resilience. Manufacturers and contract processors contemplating upgrades prioritize vendors with diversified manufacturing footprints, robust distribution networks, and demonstrated capacity for expedited validation support. Ultimately, tariff-driven shifts are prompting a more holistic view of procurement, emphasizing strategic sourcing, inventory hedging, and collaborative vendor agreements to sustain non-thermal processing deployments.

Actionable segmentation insights revealing how product categories technologies food forms and end user dynamics determine viable non thermal processing pathways and commercial approaches

Insightful segmentation analysis reveals distinct opportunity and risk profiles when considering product categories, technologies, food forms, and end users. Product type distinctions matter; within dairy, subcategories such as butter, cheese, milk, and yogurt present divergent processing needs driven by texture, microbial ecology, and consumer expectations. Butter and cheese manufacturers often prioritize texture stability and fat phase behavior, whereas milk and yogurt processors emphasize pathogen reduction without compromising protein functionality. Fruit juice applications differ as well, with apple and orange juices each presenting unique enzyme activity and flavor compound stability challenges that influence technology selection and parameter optimization.

Technology-level segmentation highlights that cold plasma, high pressure processing, irradiation, ozone treatment, pulsed electric fields, ultrasound, and UV treatment each carry specific efficacy profiles across different food matrices. For instance, high pressure processing excels for liquid and semi-solid products where uniform pressure transmission is achievable, while pulsed electric fields can be particularly effective for liquid beverages seeking minimal thermal impact. Food form is a critical axis: liquid matrices often allow more uniform treatment and predictable microbial inactivation, whereas solid foods and particulate-rich matrices require tailored energy delivery and process validation.

End user segmentation further refines strategic implications. Beverage companies, contract food processors, food manufacturers, and food service providers each face different operational constraints and investment horizons. A beverage industry player may focus on continuous flow solutions optimized for clarified juices, while a contract processor needs flexible systems capable of handling multiple formats and rapid changeovers. Therefore, a layered segmentation approach is essential for identifying feasible adoption pathways, prioritizing technology investments, and aligning commercialization strategies with customer needs.

Key regional insights that explain how regulatory complexity consumer trends and infrastructure maturity shape non thermal processing adoption across global markets

Regional dynamics are shaping how non-thermal technologies are adopted and scaled across global value chains. In the Americas, stakeholders are driven by consumer demand for clean label products and by well-established cold chain infrastructures that support distribution of minimally processed goods. Regulatory frameworks in this region tend toward rigorous validation requirements, prompting manufacturers to emphasize documented process controls and comprehensive safety dossiers when deploying new technologies.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous regulatory and market environment where certain countries have advanced acceptance of specific non-thermal methods while others require additional evidence or localized trials. In this multi-jurisdictional context, cross-border exporters must navigate varied labeling, food safety, and import protocols, which can influence where pilot plants and early commercial deployments are prioritized. Supply chain fragmentation in some parts of this region also creates opportunities for decentralized processing models and mobile treatment solutions.

Asia-Pacific markets are characterized by rapid modernization of processing facilities and significant investment in manufacturing capacity. Growing urbanization and evolving consumer preferences are driving demand for fresh-like products, encouraging adoption of technologies that support extended shelf life without traditional thermal footprints. However, diverse regulatory landscapes and varying infrastructure maturity levels mean that adoption strategies often require tailored validation programs and localized technical support to ensure consistent process outcomes.

Key insights into competitive positioning and collaborative business models that are enabling technology providers and operators to accelerate scalable non thermal processing deployments

Competitive positioning within the non-thermal processing ecosystem is defined less by single actors and more by integrated value chains that combine equipment manufacturers, technology licensors, systems integrators, and service providers. Market leaders distinguish themselves through demonstrated reliability, scalability of solutions, and depth of application expertise across multiple food matrices. Those that invest in rigorous third-party validation, strong customer training programs, and robust aftermarket networks tend to achieve higher rates of long term adoption among large food manufacturers and contract processors.

Collaborative models are emerging as a common pathway to commercialization. Strategic partnerships between technology developers and packaging or ingredient specialists facilitate end-to-end solutions that address both microbial control and shelf-life retention. Similarly, alliances with academic and government laboratories help accelerate regulatory acceptance by producing peer-reviewed efficacy data and harmonized validation protocols. Financially oriented players offering flexible procurement mechanisms, leasing, or processing-as-a-service arrangements can lower adoption barriers for smaller manufacturers and fast moving consumer goods brands.

Finally, the most resilient companies are those that systematically capture field performance data to inform iterative improvements. By institutionalizing feedback loops between R&D, operations, and commercial teams, organizations can refine process parameters, reduce variability across facilities, and demonstrate consistent product quality to customers and regulators.

Practical and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to validate procure and scale non thermal processing solutions while managing supply chain regulatory and operational risks

Industry leaders seeking to harness the potential of non-thermal processing should pursue an integrated set of actions that align technology selection with commercial objectives, compliance needs, and operational realities. First, prioritize pilot programs that simulate real production conditions for the specific product types of interest; include representative subcategories such as butter, cheese, milk, yogurt, apple and orange juices, poultry and red meat to ensure comprehensive validation. These pilots should incorporate both liquid and solid food forms and evaluate the full range of candidate technologies including cold plasma, high pressure processing, irradiation, ozone treatment, pulsed electric fields, ultrasound, and UV treatment.

Second, strengthen cross-functional governance to accelerate adoption. Create multidisciplinary teams that bring together R&D, quality assurance, operations, procurement, and regulatory affairs to streamline decision making and to ensure that equipment procurement and installation are aligned with validation timelines. Third, develop procurement strategies that mitigate tariff and supply chain risks by qualifying multiple vendors, considering local manufacturing options, and negotiating service level agreements for spare parts and technical support.

Fourth, engage proactively with regulators and trade partners to establish clear validation pathways and to anticipate import/export implications. Finally, invest in workforce training and digital monitoring systems that capture process performance metrics, enabling continuous improvement and building the evidentiary base required for broader commercialization across contract processors, food manufacturers, beverage companies, and food service providers.

A rigorous hybrid research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews technical validation and secondary literature to produce reliable actionable insights on non thermal processing

This research synthesis draws on a hybrid methodology that integrates primary stakeholder engagement, targeted technical assessment, and comprehensive secondary research. Primary inputs include structured interviews with technical leaders in processing, operations managers at food manufacturing firms, and validation specialists to capture real world constraints and best practices. These insights were complemented by consultations with equipment engineers and systems integrators to evaluate installation, retrofit, and maintenance considerations under varying facility footprints and production rates.

Secondary analysis incorporated peer reviewed literature, regulatory guidance documents, and technical white papers to map efficacy profiles of technologies such as cold plasma, high pressure processing, pulsed electric fields, ultrasound, UV treatment, irradiation, and ozone treatment across different food matrices. The methodology also included comparative assessment of food form implications, drawing distinctions between liquid and solid applications, and a cross-sector review of end user needs spanning beverage industry, contract food processors, food manufacturers, and food service providers.

Quality assurance measures included triangulation of findings across independent sources, scenario testing to examine tariff and supply chain sensitivities, and iterative validation of conclusions with industry practitioners. Limitations relate to the evolving regulatory landscape and ongoing technological refinements, which underscore the importance of continuous monitoring and targeted follow up studies for highly specific product applications.

A conclusive synthesis that emphasizes validation driven adoption strategic sourcing and cross functional readiness as keys to scaling non thermal processing across diverse food categories

Non-thermal processing represents a strategic nexus of technology, regulation, and consumer preference that offers tangible pathways to improve product quality while meeting safety requirements. Across dairy, fruit juices, meats, and seafood, diverse technologies demonstrate differentiated strengths that require careful matching to product type and food form. As adoption expands, successful organizations will be those that integrate rigorous validation, resilient procurement strategies, and strong cross-functional governance to convert technical promise into commercial reality.

Tariff and supply chain dynamics add a layer of complexity that can influence deployment timelines and total cost considerations, making strategic sourcing and vendor diversification essential. Regional differences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific require tailored approaches to regulatory engagement and local support infrastructure. Ultimately, the path to scaling non-thermal solutions is iterative: pilot work, data driven validation, and responsive operationalization create the conditions for sustained adoption and competitive differentiation.

Leaders who combine technical diligence with strategic partnerships and workforce readiness will be best positioned to translate non-thermal processing advances into improved product experiences and stronger market positioning. Continued investment in applied research and collaborative validation will further reduce barriers to entry and expand the array of viable applications across industry segments.

Product Code: MRR-430D3EB72ABB

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

5.1. Increasing adoption of high-pressure processing for enhancing plant-based protein shelf life
5.2. Integration of pulsed electric fields with HPP to improve microbial inactivation and nutrient retention
5.3. Expansion of cold plasma technology for surface decontamination in fresh produce supply chains
5.4. Advancements in supercritical CO2 extraction for clean label ingredient recovery from food byproducts
5.5. Rising investment in multi-hurdle non-thermal processing systems for extended shelf-life products
5.6. Regulatory harmonization efforts driving global commercialization of non-thermal food processing technologies
5.7. Consumer demand for clean label minimally processed foods boosting UV-C and ohmic heating applications
5.8. Scale-up challenges and engineering solutions for continuous flow non-thermal processing at industrial scale

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Product Type

8.1. Dairy
- 8.1.1. Butter
- 8.1.2. Cheese
- 8.1.3. Milk
- 8.1.4. Yogurt
8.2. Fruit Juice
- 8.2.1. Apple Juice
- 8.2.2. Orange Juice
8.3. Meat
- 8.3.1. Poultry
- 8.3.2. Red Meat
8.4. Seafood

9. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Technology

9.1. Cold Plasma
9.2. High Pressure Processing (HPP)
9.3. Irradiation
9.4. Ozone Treatment
9.5. Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF)
9.6. Ultrasound
9.7. UV Treatment

10. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Food Form

10.1. Liquid
10.2. Solid

11. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by End User

11.1. Beverage Industry
11.2. Contract Food Processors
11.3. Food Manufacturers
11.4. Food Service Providers

12. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Region

12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Group

13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO

14. Non-Thermal Processing Market, by Country

14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. JBT Corporation
- 15.3.2. Hiperbaric S.A.
- 15.3.3. SPX Flow, Inc.
- 15.3.4. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
- 15.3.5. Multivac Sepp Haggenmuller SE & Co. KG
- 15.3.6. Tetra Pak International S.A.
- 15.3.7. Buhler AG
- 15.3.8. ELEA GmbH
- 15.3.9. Claranor
- 15.3.10. SteriBeam AG