PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 1952464

PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 1952464

Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market by Equipment Type, Platform, Operation Mode, Propulsion, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032

PUBLISHED: February 24, 2026

PAGES: 197 Pages

DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days

SELECT AN OPTION

The Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market was valued at USD 196.82 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 211.64 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.70%, reaching USD 330.97 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 196.82 million
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 211.64 million
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 330.97 million
CAGR (%)	7.70%

Framing the contemporary operating environment for maritime search and rescue equipment to align technological innovation with operational imperatives and procurement realities

Maritime search and rescue (SAR) operations have always required a blend of robust equipment, rigorous training, and coordinated command structures. In recent years the convergence of advanced sensors, autonomous platforms, and resilient communication systems has reshaped the operational landscape. This introduction outlines the contemporary environment in which SAR practitioners, maritime operators, and policy makers make procurement and deployment decisions, emphasizing interoperability, survivability, and rapid situational awareness.

Technological advances have expanded the toolkit available to responders, from enhanced thermal imaging and forward-looking sonar to unmanned surface vehicles that extend reach without increasing risk to crew. Concurrently, evolving maritime traffic patterns and the intensification of offshore activities demand adaptive capability mixes that can be fielded quickly and integrated across multiple platforms. The dynamics of procurement cycles, maintenance ecosystems, and standards alignment are equally important, as life-saving systems must operate reliably over long lifespans and under diverse environmental stresses.

This introduction frames the report's purpose: to synthesize the strategic and technical drivers that influence equipment selection, to clarify how stakeholders are prioritizing investments, and to highlight the operational imperatives that should guide next-generation SAR capability development. By setting this context, readers will be positioned to interpret subsequent sections with an understanding of both the opportunities and constraints shaping maritime rescue modernization.

How converging trends in autonomy, sensor fusion, and regulatory expectations are reshaping procurement priorities and operational approaches across maritime rescue communities

The maritime SAR landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging vectors: technological evolution, operational complexity, and regulatory emphasis on maritime safety. Technological maturation of autonomous systems and sensor fusion architectures has moved capabilities from experimental to operationally relevant, enabling persistent monitoring and rapid target acquisition in scenarios that previously required intensive manned sorties.

Operational complexity has intensified as offshore energy installations, higher-density commercial shipping lanes, and recreational vessel proliferation increase the range of incidents that SAR organizations must address. This trend has pushed organizations to prioritize modular, interoperable systems that can be reconfigured for different mission sets and deployed with predictable logistics support. Consequently, procurement strategies are favoring equipment that delivers clear mission adaptability while minimizing training overhead and sustainment costs.

Regulatory bodies and international maritime organizations are strengthening expectations for distress signaling, crew survivability equipment, and interoperability standards. These policy shifts compel manufacturers to adhere to more rigorous certification paths and encourage end users to update legacy inventories. In parallel, there is a marked emphasis on human factors engineering and ease of use, ensuring that lifesaving equipment performs under stress and during rapid decision-making.

Taken together, these shifts suggest a market that rewards innovation tied directly to demonstrable operational value. The most consequential impacts will be on lifecycle support models, cross-platform data-sharing architectures, and the balance between autonomous capabilities and human-in-the-loop control where accountability, legal frameworks, and safety remain paramount.

Assessing how import duty adjustments and tariff dynamics in 2025 are triggering supply chain resilience measures, sourcing shifts, and procurement risk mitigation across maritime rescue programs

The evolving tariff landscape in the United States for 2025 introduces a new layer of complexity for procurement officers and manufacturers operating within global supply chains. Tariff adjustments affect cost structures for imported components and complete systems, influence sourcing strategies, and can accelerate localization efforts among producers aiming to insulate end users from price volatility. Organizations that rely on foreign-manufactured specialized sensors, electronics, or propulsion subsystems will need to reassess total cost of ownership and logistics timelines.

Beyond direct pricing impacts, tariff changes can prompt strategic shifts in supplier relationships. Manufacturers may pursue nearshoring of critical subassemblies or secure multi-supplier architectures to mitigate risk. Buyers, in turn, may place higher value on vendors who can demonstrate diversified manufacturing footprints or domestic production capabilities for critical items. These dynamics will also influence spare parts availability and lead times, making maintenance plans and stock policies a central component of program resilience.

Policy-driven changes in import duties also accelerate conversations about standardization and interoperability. When procurement risk rises due to tariff-induced cost uncertainty, agencies prefer equipment with open architectures that permit component substitution without compromising system performance or certification. Consequently, interoperability standards and modular design practices gain importance as risk mitigation tools.

In sum, the cumulative impact of tariff developments in 2025 will be less about isolated price changes and more about how organizations adapt supply chain strategies, prioritize suppliers with resilient production footprints, and structure acquisition contracts to preserve operational readiness despite economic headwinds.

Comprehensive segmentation insights revealing how equipment categories, end users, platforms, operation modes, and propulsion choices drive distinct procurement and capability trade-offs

Segmentation analysis reveals the nuanced ways that capability needs and procurement priorities diverge across equipment categories, end users, platforms, operation modes, and propulsion systems. Based on Equipment Type, the market is studied across Communication Systems, Epirbs, Personal Flotation Devices, Rescue Boats, Search Radars, Sonar Systems, Thermal Imaging Systems, and Unmanned Surface Vehicles; within Communication Systems, the further delineation into AIS Transponders, Digital Selective Calling Systems, Satellite Phones, and VHF Radios highlights how voice, data, and automated identification requirements are being balanced by different user groups. The Epirbs category, split into Category I and Category II devices, underscores distinctions in survivability expectations and regulatory compliance for crew of varying vessel classes. Personal Flotation Devices are parsed into Immersion Suits, Life Jackets, Life Rafts, and Life Rings, reflecting divergent endurance, exposure protection, and rapid-deployment needs. Rescue Boats encompass Conventional Rescue Boats, Hovercraft, and Rigid Inflatable Boats, each offering trade-offs between speed, sea-state operability, and payload capacity. Search Radars examined across S-Band Radar, Solid State Radar, and X-Band Radar reveal choices driven by range, resolution, and clutter performance, while Sonar Systems-Forward Looking Sonar, Multi-Beam Echo Sounders, and Side Scan Sonar-address underwater detection and mapping requirements. Thermal Imaging Systems, segmented into Handheld Systems, UAV Mounted Systems, and Vessel Mounted Systems, illustrate the spectrum from individual rescuer support to platform-integrated surveillance. Unmanned Surface Vehicles, differentiated into Large USVs, Micro USVs, and Small USVs, show how scale affects endurance, payload, and operational concept.

Based on End User, market distinctions are evident among Coast Guard, Commercial Shipping Companies, Military, Offshore Platform Operators, Recreational Boat Operators, and Search and Rescue Organizations; the Coast Guard differentiation between National Coast Guard Services and Private Coast Guard Contractors captures the mix of public duty and outsourced capabilities that characterize many jurisdictions. Commercial Shipping Companies categorized into Bulk Carriers, Container Shipping, LNG Carriers, and Tankers reflect vessel-specific safety equipment profiles and regulatory drivers. The Military split across Marine Corps, Navy, and Special Forces points to divergent mission sets ranging from mass rescue operations to special operations support. Offshore Platform Operators, spanning Offshore Wind Farms and Oil and Gas, have rising obligations to ensure worker evacuation and emergency response across complex installations. Recreational Boat Operators, including Sailing Vessels, Small Craft, and Yachts, drive demand for compact, user-friendly solutions, while Search and Rescue Organizations differentiated into Government Agencies, NGOs, and Private Operators illuminate varying budgetary constraints and mission durations.

Based on Platform, market segmentation across Aerial, Subsea, and Surface shows how mission geometry dictates equipment selection; the Aerial segment includes Helicopters, Manned Fixed Wing Aircraft, and UAVs, each offering unique endurance and deployment profiles. The Subsea segment, split into AUVs, Manned Submersibles, and ROVs, with AUVs further described as Gliders and Torpedo Shaped variants and ROVs separated into Observation and Work Class units, demonstrates how underwater search tasks require highly specialized systems. The Surface segment, covering Patrol Vessels, Rescue Vessels, and Unmanned Surface Vehicles, indicates how crewed and uncrewed assets are integrated to cover wide operational envelopes.

Based on Operation Mode, distinctions among Autonomous, Manual Rescue, and Remote Operated modalities show the extent to which human decision-making is embedded in operations; Autonomous capabilities include Autonomous Underwater Vehicles and Unmanned Surface Vehicles, with AUVs further categorized into Gliders and Torpedo Shaped variants, highlighting long-endurance versus high-speed paradigms. Manual Rescue covers scenarios such as Man Overboard Rescue and Rescue Swimmer Assisted Rescue where human judgement and physical intervention are primary. Remote Operated modes, including Remote Controlled Drones, ROVs, and USVs, capture a middle ground where human operators direct systems to reduce risk while retaining centralized control.

Based on Propulsion, the market studied across Diesel, Electric, and Hybrid platforms sheds light on operational endurance, maintenance regimes, and environmental compliance; Diesel propulsion includes Inboard Diesel Engines and Outboard Diesel Engines, Electric options cover Battery Electric and Fuel Cell Electric variants, while Hybrid architectures comprise Diesel Electric Hybrid, Parallel Hybrid, and Series Hybrid configurations, each presenting distinct trade-offs in range, refueling complexity, and emissions profile.

These segmentation insights collectively underscore that procurement strategies must be multidimensional, taking into account mission profile, regulatory environment, sustainment capacity, and platform compatibility. The fragmentation across segments creates opportunities for specialized suppliers and for integrators who can deliver interoperable subsystems that simplify logistics and training.

How regional operational profiles across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific create differentiated demand patterns and procurement imperatives for rescue equipment

Regional dynamics shape both technology adoption curves and procurement behaviors across the maritime SAR ecosystem. In the Americas, emphasis centers on modernizing fleets through sensor upgrades, bolstering search and rescue coordination across vast coastal jurisdictions, and addressing a mix of commercial and recreational incidents. Investments in interoperable communication systems and vessel-mounted thermal imaging reflect the need to support high-traffic ports and remote coastal operations, with procurement preferences favoring ruggedness and proven lifecycle support.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a diverse mosaic of priorities driven by dense commercial shipping corridors, offshore energy installations, and varied regulatory frameworks. In Western and Northern Europe, stringent safety standards and environmental regulations accelerate the adoption of low-emission propulsion and advanced surveillance radars, while in the Middle East and parts of Africa, rapid offshore energy development places premium value on rapid-response rescue vessels and robust evacuation systems. Cross-border SAR cooperation and mutual assistance agreements in this region also elevate the requirement for standardized communication and identification systems.

Asia-Pacific is characterized by a broad spectrum of operational environments, from high-density coastal traffic and expansive archipelagos to rapidly expanding offshore renewables and commercial ports. Regional priorities include scalable unmanned surface and aerial platforms to extend coverage, multi-sensor integration to cope with complex maritime clutter, and resilient supply chains to support island and remote operations. Given the scale of maritime activity, end users in this region are increasingly looking for solutions that balance cost-effectiveness with modular upgrade paths that can be fielded across heterogeneous fleets.

Across all regions, common themes emerge: a push toward interoperability, lifecycle planning, and systems that reduce cognitive load for operators. However, the regional variances in regulation, infrastructure maturity, and incident profiles require adaptable procurement frameworks that recognize local constraints while leveraging global technology trends.

Competitive landscape analysis showing how manufacturers, integrators, and innovators are aligning on interoperability, sustainment commitments, and platform modularity to meet SAR needs

Key companies operating within the maritime search and rescue equipment space exhibit a range of strategic postures, from platform specialization to systems integration and aftermarket support. Leading manufacturers of sensors and imaging systems emphasize rigorous testing, certification pathways, and partnerships with platform builders to ensure seamless integration. Their go-to-market strategies often combine direct governmental contracts with distributor networks to reach commercial and recreational end users.

Producers of rescue vessels and flotation systems prioritize durability, regulatory compliance, and lifecycle support. They differentiate on hull design, materials science, and maintenance networks that reduce downtime. Firms developing unmanned surface vehicles and autonomous underwater systems are investing significantly in autonomy stacks, secure communications, and payload modularity so their platforms can be repurposed across search, surveillance, and inspection missions.

Service providers and integrators play a critical role in translating equipment capabilities into operational outcomes. These companies offer training, mission planning tools, and maintenance contracts that address the real-world challenges of sustaining complex fleets. Their value proposition rests on delivering repeatable readiness, rapid spare parts provisioning, and remote diagnostics that keep assets mission-capable.

Smaller innovators and startups contribute disruptive technologies-such as advanced thermal sensors, lightweight USVs, and efficient battery systems-that larger firms may adopt or partner with. The competitive landscape is thus a mix of incumbent reliability and emergent agility, with successful companies demonstrating both technical excellence and an ability to support long-term sustainment commitments.

Actionable strategic guidance for procurement leaders to prioritize modularity, supply chain resilience, lifecycle support, human factors, and interoperability in rescue capability decisions

Industry leaders should adopt a strategic posture that balances immediate operational requirements with future-proofing investments. First, prioritize procurement of equipment with open architectures and modular interfaces to permit incremental upgrades without full system replacement. This reduces obsolescence risk and enables integration of next-generation sensors or autonomy modules as they mature. Second, invest in diversified supply chains and establish contractual clauses that address contingency manufacturing, spare parts stockpiles, and qualified alternate suppliers to mitigate tariff and geopolitical risks.

Third, strengthen lifecycle support frameworks by contracting for defined availability levels, remote diagnostics, and training packages that ensure crews can operate and maintain systems effectively under stress. Embedding sustainment metrics into acquisition contracts aligns vendor incentives with long-term mission readiness. Fourth, pursue interoperability through adherence to widely accepted communication and data-sharing standards to simplify multi-agency response and enable rapid information exchange during multi-jurisdictional incidents.

Fifth, incorporate human factors and operational usability into procurement criteria to ensure that equipment performs reliably in real-world, high-stress environments. Investing in realistic training and simulation reduces the operational risks associated with new technologies. Finally, engage early with regulatory bodies and classification authorities to streamline certification timelines and to influence standards development where appropriate. These steps collectively strengthen resilience and ensure that capability investments deliver tangible operational benefits.

Transparent research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical standards review, and supplier profiling to produce actionable and validated SAR equipment insights

This research synthesizes primary and secondary inputs to generate a holistic view of maritime search and rescue equipment dynamics. Primary inputs include structured interviews with senior SAR operators, procurement officials, technical leads from platform manufacturers, and independent maintenance and training contractors. These dialogues focused on operational pain points, procurement constraints, and the practical performance characteristics that drive equipment selection in real-world missions.

Secondary inputs encompass a rigorous review of industry literature, regulatory frameworks, and product certification criteria to ensure alignment with current standards and compliance pathways. Technical analysis assessed technology maturation curves, interoperability frameworks, and sustainment models. The methodology also included comparative profiling of supplier capabilities, production footprints, and aftermarket support networks to evaluate supply chain resilience.

Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation of insights across multiple stakeholder groups and triangulation between qualitative interviews and documented technical specifications. Where conflicting perspectives emerged, the methodology prioritized operationally grounded evidence and corroborated supplier claims with independent maintenance and end-user feedback. This approach produces findings that are actionable for procurement decision-makers and technical program managers while being transparent about underlying assumptions and data sources.

Conclusive synthesis highlighting the imperative to align procurement, sustainment, and interoperability to translate technological advances into credible life-saving capabilities

The maritime search and rescue equipment landscape is evolving toward systems that prioritize interoperability, modularity, and resilient supply chains. Advances in autonomous platforms, sensor fusion, and low-emission propulsion are expanding capability envelopes, while regulatory pressures and operational complexity shape procurement priorities. Organizations that adopt open architectures, invest in lifecycle support, and diversify suppliers will be better positioned to maintain readiness and respond effectively to emergent incidents.

Operationally focused procurement that emphasizes human-centered design, clear sustainment metrics, and cross-platform data sharing will deliver the most immediate benefit. At the same time, preparatory investment in autonomy and unmanned platforms offers strategic advantages in risk reduction and persistent surveillance when integrated into broader mission concepts. Supply chain considerations, including the potential impacts of tariff adjustments and geopolitical disruptions, underscore the need for near-term contingency planning and longer-term localization where feasible.

In closing, the imperative for decision-makers is to align capability acquisition with a realistic assessment of operational demands, sustainment capacity, and regulatory obligations. Doing so will ensure that investments translate into measurable improvements in lifesaving outcomes and organizational resilience.

Product Code: MRR-867BED9A9FA2

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Equipment Type

8.1. Communication Systems
- 8.1.1. Ais Transponders
- 8.1.2. Digital Selective Calling Systems
- 8.1.3. Satellite Phones
- 8.1.4. Vhf Radios
8.2. Epirbs
- 8.2.1. Category I Epirb
- 8.2.2. Category Ii Epirb
8.3. Personal Flotation Devices
- 8.3.1. Immersion Suits
- 8.3.2. Life Jackets
- 8.3.3. Life Rafts
- 8.3.4. Life Rings
8.4. Rescue Boats
- 8.4.1. Conventional Rescue Boats
- 8.4.2. Hovercraft
- 8.4.3. Rigid Inflatable Boats
8.5. Search Radars
- 8.5.1. S-Band Radar
- 8.5.2. Solid State Radar
- 8.5.3. X-Band Radar
8.6. Sonar Systems
- 8.6.1. Forward Looking Sonar
- 8.6.2. Multi-Beam Echo Sounders
- 8.6.3. Side Scan Sonar
8.7. Thermal Imaging Systems
- 8.7.1. Handheld Systems
- 8.7.2. Uav Mounted Systems
- 8.7.3. Vessel Mounted Systems
8.8. Unmanned Surface Vehicles
- 8.8.1. Large Usvs
- 8.8.2. Micro Usvs
- 8.8.3. Small Usvs

9. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Platform

9.1. Aerial
- 9.1.1. Helicopters
- 9.1.2. Manned Fixed Wing Aircraft
- 9.1.3. Uavs
9.2. Subsea
- 9.2.1. Auvs
  - 9.2.1.1. Gliders
  - 9.2.1.2. Torpedo Shaped Auvs
- 9.2.2. Manned Submersibles
- 9.2.3. Rovs
  - 9.2.3.1. Observation Rovs
  - 9.2.3.2. Work Class Rovs
9.3. Surface
- 9.3.1. Patrol Vessels
- 9.3.2. Rescue Vessels
- 9.3.3. Unmanned Surface Vehicles

10. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Operation Mode

10.1. Autonomous
- 10.1.1. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
  - 10.1.1.1. Gliders
  - 10.1.1.2. Torpedo Shaped Auvs
- 10.1.2. Unmanned Surface Vehicles
10.2. Manual Rescue
- 10.2.1. Man Overboard Rescue
- 10.2.2. Rescue Swimmer Assisted Rescue
10.3. Remote Operated
- 10.3.1. Remote Controlled Drones
- 10.3.2. Rovs
- 10.3.3. Usvs

11. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Propulsion

11.1. Diesel
- 11.1.1. Inboard Diesel Engines
- 11.1.2. Outboard Diesel Engines
11.2. Electric
- 11.2.1. Battery Electric
- 11.2.2. Fuel Cell Electric
11.3. Hybrid
- 11.3.1. Diesel Electric Hybrid
- 11.3.2. Parallel Hybrid
- 11.3.3. Series Hybrid

12. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by End User

12.1. Coast Guard
- 12.1.1. National Coast Guard Services
- 12.1.2. Private Coast Guard Contractors
12.2. Commercial Shipping Companies
- 12.2.1. Bulk Carriers
- 12.2.2. Container Shipping
- 12.2.3. Lng Carriers
- 12.2.4. Tankers
12.3. Military
- 12.3.1. Marine Corps
- 12.3.2. Navy
- 12.3.3. Special Forces
12.4. Offshore Platform Operators
- 12.4.1. Offshore Wind Farms
- 12.4.2. Oil And Gas
12.5. Recreational Boat Operators
- 12.5.1. Sailing Vessels
- 12.5.2. Small Craft
- 12.5.3. Yachts
12.6. Search And Rescue Organizations
- 12.6.1. Government Agencies
- 12.6.2. Ngos
- 12.6.3. Private Operators

13. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Region

13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Group

14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO

15. Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market, by Country

15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea

16. United States Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market

17. China Maritime Search & Rescue Equipments Market

18. Competitive Landscape

18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
18.5. ACR Electronics, Inc.
18.6. BAE Systems plc
18.7. Cobham Limited
18.8. Consilium Safety Group AB
18.9. Crewsaver Ltd.
18.10. Elbit Systems Ltd.
18.11. Fassmer GmbH & Co. KG
18.12. Garmin Ltd.
18.13. General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.
18.14. Honeywell International Inc.
18.15. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
18.16. Lalizas S.A.
18.17. Leonardo S.p.A.
18.18. Maritime Partner AS
18.19. New Marine, Inc.
18.20. Palfinger Marine GmbH
18.21. RTX Corporation
18.22. SHM Shipcare Pvt. Ltd.
18.23. Survitec Group Ltd.
18.24. VIKING Life-Saving Equipment A/S