PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 2081511

PUBLISHER: 360iResearch | PRODUCT CODE: 2081511

Aircraft Strut Market by Type, Aircraft Type, Material Type, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032

PUBLISHED: July 8, 2026

PAGES: 193 Pages

DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days

ADD TO COMPARE

SELECT AN OPTION

List of Tables

The Aircraft Strut Market is projected to grow by USD 646.35 million at a CAGR of 7.99% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 377.28 million
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 405.55 million
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 646.35 million
CAGR (%)	7.99%

The aircraft strut market is anchored in the performance requirements of landing gear, engine support, wing bracing, helicopter skids, and airframe structural systems. Aircraft struts, particularly oleo-pneumatic shock struts used in landing gear, absorb landing loads, manage taxi vibration, and protect airframe integrity across commercial aviation, defense aircraft, business jets, rotorcraft, and unmanned aerial systems.

Demand is supported by measurable aviation fundamentals. Airbus' Global Market Forecast and Boeing's Commercial Market Outlook both indicate a need for more than 40,000 new commercial aircraft deliveries over the next two decades, while IATA has reported a strong recovery in global passenger traffic after the pandemic. These fleet-growth and utilization trends increase requirements for OEM-installed struts, replacement components, overhaul kits, seals, coatings, actuators, and precision-machined titanium, aluminum, and high-strength steel assemblies.

Transformative Shifts in the Aircraft Strut Landscape

The aircraft strut landscape is shifting from conventional load-bearing hardware toward lighter, smarter, and more maintainable systems. OEMs and tier suppliers are prioritizing weight reduction through advanced alloys, optimized forgings, additive manufacturing for qualified noncritical parts, and corrosion-resistant surface treatments that extend service intervals in harsh operating environments.

MRO demand is also changing. Airlines are extending asset life while managing high aircraft utilization, which increases attention on landing gear overhaul cycles, shock strut servicing, seal integrity, and non-destructive testing. At the same time, defense modernization, UAV adoption, and electric aircraft development are pushing suppliers to design struts for higher reliability, lower lifecycle cost, and traceable quality compliance under FAA, EASA, AS9100, and military airworthiness standards.

Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Aircraft Struts

Artificial intelligence is becoming a practical enabler in the aircraft strut value chain, especially in predictive maintenance, inspection automation, and engineering simulation. Sensor data from landing gear loads, strut pressure, temperature, taxi cycles, and vibration profiles can be analyzed to identify early degradation patterns in seals, bushings, coatings, and hydraulic damping performance before unscheduled removal occurs.

AI also improves manufacturing and quality assurance. Machine-learning models can support defect detection in forged, machined, and coated components using visual inspection, X-ray, ultrasonic, and dimensional measurement data. For engineering teams, AI-assisted digital twins help evaluate fatigue behavior, landing load cases, and material trade-offs, reducing iteration time while preserving the certification discipline required in safety-critical aerospace structures.

Key Regional Insights Across the Aircraft Strut Market

Asia-Pacific is one of the most important regions for aircraft struts due to expanding airline fleets, rising domestic air travel, and continued aircraft production and MRO investment in China, India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Australia. Airbus and Boeing delivery outlooks consistently identify Asia-Pacific as a major driver of long-term aircraft demand, making the region central to landing gear strut, support strut, and aftermarket component requirements.

North America benefits from the presence of major OEMs, defense aviation programs, landing gear specialists, and a large commercial fleet base in the United States and Canada. Europe remains highly relevant through Airbus-linked supply chains, advanced materials engineering, and strict EASA certification requirements. Latin America, led by Brazil and Mexico, contributes through regional aviation, aerostructures manufacturing, and established aerospace industrial activity. The Middle East continues to support demand through long-haul airline fleets and MRO hubs, while Africa's opportunity is tied to fleet renewal, regional connectivity, and the need for durable strut systems suited to demanding operating conditions.

Key Group Insights for Aircraft Strut Demand

ASEAN is gaining relevance through MRO expansion in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia, where rising fleet utilization supports overhaul and replacement demand for aircraft landing gear struts and related components. The GCC is strategically important because large airline fleets in the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia require high-reliability landing systems for long-haul operations, harsh climatic conditions, and intensive flight cycles.

The European Union supports aircraft strut innovation through integrated aerospace supply chains, research programs, and EASA-regulated certification depth. BRICS markets bring a combination of aircraft demand, localization efforts, defense procurement, and aerospace manufacturing investment, particularly across China, India, Brazil, and Russia. G7 countries remain influential because they host leading aerospace ecosystems, material suppliers, MRO networks, and certification authorities, while NATO members sustain defense aircraft readiness programs that create steady demand for rugged, compliant strut assemblies and overhaul services.

Key Country Insights in the Aircraft Strut Market

The United States is the most influential country market due to major commercial and defense aircraft programs, FAA oversight, and a dense network of tier suppliers and MRO providers. Canada contributes through business aviation, regional aircraft heritage, and landing gear expertise, while Mexico is strengthening its position as an aerospace manufacturing hub supported by export-oriented production clusters. Brazil benefits from its commercial, executive, and defense aircraft ecosystem and established aerostructures capabilities.

In Europe, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain are tied to commercial aircraft supply chains, defense aviation, and advanced aerospace manufacturing, while Russia maintains demand through military aviation and domestic fleet support. China is expanding aircraft manufacturing and fleet growth through domestic aircraft programs and airline demand; India is increasing its aerospace relevance through airline orders, defense modernization, and MRO policy support. Japan and South Korea contribute through precision manufacturing, defense programs, and supplier capabilities, while Australia supports demand through defense readiness, regional aviation, and Asia-Pacific MRO activity.

Actionable Recommendations for Aircraft Strut Industry Leaders

Industry leaders should prioritize lightweight, corrosion-resistant, and maintenance-friendly aircraft strut designs that reduce lifecycle cost without compromising fatigue performance or certification compliance. Suppliers should invest in materials engineering, precision machining, special processing, and validated repair procedures to support both OEM production and aftermarket revenue.

Executives should also expand predictive maintenance capabilities by integrating strut condition data with aircraft health monitoring systems. Strategic actions include dual-sourcing critical materials, strengthening FAA and EASA documentation readiness, expanding MRO partnerships in high-growth regions, and using digital twins to improve design validation, inventory planning, and service-life extension programs.

Research Methodology for Aircraft Strut Market Analysis

This executive summary is based on a structured research approach combining public aviation data, regulatory references, OEM outlooks, trade analysis, and supplier-level evidence. Key sources considered include Airbus Global Market Forecast, Boeing Commercial Market Outlook, IATA traffic reporting, ICAO aviation statistics, FAA and EASA regulatory frameworks, SIPRI defense expenditure data, and publicly available aerospace industry disclosures.

The analysis applies triangulation across demand drivers, fleet outlooks, defense modernization, MRO activity, materials trends, and regional supply-chain indicators. Insights are interpreted through aircraft type, application, component lifecycle, certification requirements, and aftermarket behavior to provide an evidence-led view of the aircraft strut market without relying on market sizing, share, or forecasting assumptions.

Conclusion: Aircraft Struts Remain Critical to Aviation Reliability

The aircraft strut market is positioned for sustained long-term relevance because struts remain essential to landing safety, structural load management, passenger comfort, and aircraft availability. Demand is supported by fleet expansion, rising aircraft utilization, defense readiness, and the increasing technical complexity of modern airframes.

Competitive advantage will belong to suppliers that combine certified engineering, advanced materials, manufacturing precision, and predictive maintenance intelligence. As OEM production rates recover and global MRO networks expand, aircraft strut manufacturers that deliver reliability, traceability, and lower lifecycle cost will be best positioned to capture future demand.

Product Code: MRR-43281349BA1D

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Market Dynamics
- 4.3.1. Key Drivers
- 4.3.2. Key Restraints
- 4.3.3. Key Opportunities
- 4.3.4. Key Challenges
4.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.5. PESTLE Analysis
4.6. Market Outlook
- 4.6.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
- 4.6.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
- 4.6.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.7. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2026

7. Aircraft Strut Market, by Type

7.1. Shock Absorber Struts
7.2. Hydraulic Struts
7.3. Pneumatic Struts
7.4. Gas-Spring Struts

8. Aircraft Strut Market, by Aircraft Type

8.1. Commercial Aircraft
8.2. Military Aircraft
8.3. General Aviation Aircraft

9. Aircraft Strut Market, by Material Type

9.1. Aluminum Struts
9.2. Carbon Fiber Struts
9.3. Composite Struts
9.4. Steel Struts
9.5. Titanium Struts

10. Aircraft Strut Market, by Application

10.1. Control Surface Struts/Linkage Struts
10.2. Engine Mount Struts
10.3. Fuselage Struts
10.4. Landing Gear Struts
10.5. Wing Struts/Bracing Struts

11. Aircraft Strut Market, by Distribution Channel

11.1. Direct Sales
11.2. Aftermarket

12. Aircraft Strut Market, by Region

12.1. Asia-Pacific
12.2. North America
12.3. Latin America
12.4. Europe
12.5. Middle East
12.6. Africa

13. Aircraft Strut Market, by Group

13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO

14. Aircraft Strut Market, by Country

14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

15.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 15.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 15.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
15.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
15.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
15.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025

16. Company Profiles

16.1. AAR Corp.
16.2. Airbus Helicopters S.A.S.
16.3. AMETEK, Inc.
16.4. Boeing Company
16.5. CIRCOR International, Inc.
16.6. Crissair, Inc.
16.7. GKN Aerospace Services Limited
16.8. Heroux-Devtek Inc.
16.9. Hyundai Motor Group
16.10. KAI Aerospace Components Co., Ltd.
16.11. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
16.12. Liebherr-Aerospace Lindenberg GmbH
16.13. Lockheed Martin Corporation
16.14. Magellan Aerospace Corporation
16.15. Meggitt PLC
16.16. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
16.17. Moog Inc.
16.18. Northrop Grumman Corporation
16.19. Parker Hannifin Corporation
16.20. Safran Landing Systems
16.21. Senior plc
16.22. Shimadzu Corporation
16.23. Triumph Group, Inc.
16.24. UTC Aerospace Systems
16.25. Woodward, Inc.