SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117135

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117135

Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Cancer Early Detection | Diagnostics Market Intelligence | US, EU5, Japan & China

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 140 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 7-10 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PPT (Single User License)
USD 6900
PPT (2 - 3 User License)
USD 7500
PPT (Site License - Up to 10 Users)
USD 10500
PPT (Enterprise License)
USD 15500

Add to Cart

The idea that a blood draw - or a urine sample - could find cancer before symptoms has organized a decade of diagnostics ambition, and Japan now hosts some of the field's most distinctive bets. Craif built a multi-cancer screen on urinary microRNA and distributes it through the country's dense health-check channel, raising a Series D in 2026 to scale. Sysmex's Inostics unit brings BEAMing digital PCR liquid biopsy to recurrence monitoring. A.D.A.M. Innovations partnered with SOPHiA Genetics to industrialize analysis. And Guardant Health set the reimbursement precedent that everything else cites: Guardant360 CDx, approved and paid under NHI, proved that a liquid biopsy test can clear Japan's regulatory and pricing machinery - at least when a drug label is attached.

The contested ground is the step beyond companion use: screening and multi-cancer early detection in apparently healthy people. The scientific questions are familiar - sensitivity in early-stage disease, false-positive management, the unresolved question of whether earlier detection by these tests changes outcomes - but Japan adds its own variables. The health-check system offers a distribution channel no other country matches. Self-pay testing operates in a regulatory space distinct from NHI-covered care. Physicians worry about confirmatory capacity if screening scales. And the pricing question looms: what Japan's C1/C2/C3 machinery would make of a population-scale screening claim is untested.

This report maps the Japanese liquid biopsy landscape across its three commercial zones: therapy selection, recurrence monitoring, and early detection. It profiles the platforms and companies - domestic and foreign - with their regulatory status and evidence positions, explains the technology families from methylation to microRNA in operational terms, and analyzes the channels: health checks, corporate programs, hospitals, and the boundaries of direct-to-consumer. Comparative chapters cover the US evidence programs, European positioning, and China's fast-moving MCED market.

The report serves precision-oncology investors, companion-diagnostics teams, health-check operators and their investors, and diagnostics strategists assessing where the category's next reimbursement precedents will be set.

Scope and Coverage: The report covers liquid biopsy in Japan across therapy selection, minimal residual disease and recurrence monitoring, and multi-cancer early detection: technologies, companies, evidence, regulation, reimbursement, and channels. Comparative coverage includes the United States, Europe, and China.

Report Highlights:

  • Platform profiles: Craif miSignal, Sysmex Inostics, A.D.A.M.-SOPHiA, and foreign entrants
  • Technology family analysis: ctDNA, methylation, fragmentomics, and microRNA
  • The Guardant360 CDx reimbursement precedent and what it does and does not establish
  • Health-check channel mechanics for distributing novel cancer tests
  • Evidence programs and regulatory status across use cases
  • Confirmatory-pathway and capacity analysis for screening claims
Product Code: JPH-055

Table of Content

1. Executive Summary

2. Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Cancer Early Detection: Technology and Test Landscape

3. Clinical Evidence and Guideline Context

4. Regulatory Status: PMDA, FDA, IVDR, and NMPA Pathways

5. Reimbursement and Price Formation with a Focus on Japan

6. Adoption, Channels, and Screening Infrastructure in Japan

7. Competitive Landscape: Companies and Platforms

8. Opportunities and Barriers for Market Participants

9. Appendix: Methodology and Sources

Companies Mentioned

  • Craif (JP) - miSignal urine miRNA multi-cancer screening distributed through Japanese health-check channels; Series D financing (2026). Sysmex (JP) - Inostics BEAMing dPCR liquid biopsy and CRC recurrence-monitoring development. SOPHiA Genetics (CH) - partnership with A.D.A.M. Innovations for liquid-biopsy analysis in Japan. A.D.A.M. Innovations (JP) - genomic testing services and the SOPHiA Japan channel. Guardant Health (US) - Guardant360 CDx reimbursed in Japan and Shield CRC blood screening. Natera (US) - Signatera MRD franchise and Japan expansion following PMDA approval. GRAIL (US) - Galleri MCED test with PATHFINDER 2 and NHS-Galleri evidence generation. Exact Sciences (US) - Cancerguard MCED blood test launched (2025). Tempus (US) - xF liquid-biopsy sequencing and data-enabled oncology testing. Burning Rock (CN) - OverC MCED and tumor-informed MRD assays in China. Genecast (CN) - ctDNA MRD and liquid-biopsy assays in China. Hirotsu Bio Science (JP) - N-NOSE nematode-based urine screening sold through Japanese consumer channels.
Product Code: JPH-055

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Liquid biopsy analyte taxonomy: ctDNA, methylation, microRNA, and proteins
  • Table 2. Tumor-informed versus agnostic liquid biopsy design
  • Table 3. Methylation-based multi-cancer detection: technical principles
  • Table 4. Fragmentomics and multiomics approaches
  • Table 5. Urinary microRNA as a screening analyte
  • Table 6. Digital PCR versus NGS detection architectures
  • Table 7. Analytical validation frameworks for early-detection tests
  • Table 8. Craif miSignal platform design and indication scope
  • Table 9. Craif distribution through health-check channels
  • Table 10. Craif Series D financing (2026) and investor base
  • Table 11. Sysmex Inostics BEAMing digital PCR platform
  • Table 12. Sysmex colorectal recurrence monitoring development program
  • Table 13. A.D.A.M. Innovations and SOPHiA Genetics partnership structure
  • Table 14. Guardant Health portfolio positioning in Japan
  • Table 15. Guardant360 CDx approval and reimbursement history in Japan
  • Table 16. GRAIL Galleri development and availability status relative to Japan
  • Table 17. Exact Sciences and Freenome early-detection programs
  • Table 18. Multi-cancer early detection clinical evidence requirements
  • Table 19. PATHFINDER study design
  • Table 20. NHS-Galleri trial design
  • Table 21. Craif clinical validation study program
  • Table 22. Sensitivity by stage: interpretive frameworks
  • Table 23. Specificity and false-positive management pathways
  • Table 24. Tissue-of-origin localization performance frameworks
  • Table 25. Interval cancer and lead-time considerations
  • Table 26. Japanese population evidence base for liquid biopsy
  • Table 27. PMDA pathway options for early-detection claims
  • Table 28. NHI price formation for liquid biopsy categories
  • Table 29. Self-pay testing regulatory space in Japan
  • Table 30. Boundaries between consumer testing and medical practice
  • Table 31. Laboratory testing regulation for service-based assays
  • Table 32. Insurance coverage of confirmatory diagnostics after positive screens
  • Table 33. Guideline positions on multi-cancer testing in Japan
  • Table 34. Health-check (kenshin) channel integration for novel tests
  • Table 35. Corporate health program adoption of cancer screening tests
  • Table 36. Clinic and hospital distribution structures
  • Table 37. Direct-to-consumer boundary management in Japan
  • Table 38. Physician counseling requirements for novel screening tests
  • Table 39. Confirmatory diagnostic capacity after positive multi-cancer tests
  • Table 40. Patient communication and consent frameworks
  • Table 41. Adoption barriers in Japanese clinical practice
  • Table 42. Single-cancer versus multi-cancer test positioning
  • Table 43. Colorectal screening adjacency of blood-based tests
  • Table 44. MRD and recurrence monitoring convergence with screening platforms
  • Table 45. Pharmaceutical partnerships in liquid biopsy
  • Table 46. Data and AI roles in multiomics interpretation
  • Table 47. Investment activity in Japanese liquid biopsy
  • Table 48. Regulatory watchlist for liquid biopsy in Japan
  • Table 49. Adoption scenario framework
  • Table 50. Report methodology and evidence sources

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Liquid biopsy analyte taxonomy map
  • Figure 2. Tumor-informed versus agnostic design schematic
  • Figure 3. Methylation detection principle diagram
  • Figure 4. Fragmentomics approach schematic
  • Figure 5. Urinary microRNA workflow
  • Figure 6. Digital PCR versus NGS architecture comparison
  • Figure 7. Validation framework for early-detection tests
  • Figure 8. miSignal platform workflow
  • Figure 9. Craif health-check distribution map
  • Figure 10. Craif financing timeline
  • Figure 11. BEAMing digital PCR workflow
  • Figure 12. Sysmex recurrence monitoring program structure
  • Figure 13. A.D.A.M.-SOPHiA partnership structure map
  • Figure 14. Guardant Health Japan portfolio map
  • Figure 15. Guardant360 CDx approval and reimbursement timeline
  • Figure 16. Galleri development status map
  • Figure 17. Early-detection program landscape
  • Figure 18. MCED evidence requirement hierarchy
  • Figure 19. PATHFINDER study schema
  • Figure 20. NHS-Galleri trial schema
  • Figure 21. Craif validation program map
  • Figure 22. Stage-sensitivity interpretive framework
  • Figure 23. False-positive management pathway
  • Figure 24. Tissue-of-origin localization framework
  • Figure 25. Lead-time and interval cancer schematic
  • Figure 26. Japanese evidence base map
  • Figure 27. PMDA pathway options for screening claims
  • Figure 28. NHI price formation flow for liquid biopsy
  • Figure 29. Self-pay regulatory space map
  • Figure 30. Consumer-testing boundary framework
  • Figure 31. Laboratory service regulation map
  • Figure 32. Confirmatory coverage pathway
  • Figure 33. Guideline position map for MCED in Japan
  • Figure 34. Health-check channel integration flow
  • Figure 35. Corporate program adoption pathway
  • Figure 36. Clinic and hospital distribution map
  • Figure 37. Direct-to-consumer boundary map
  • Figure 38. Counseling requirement framework
  • Figure 39. Confirmatory capacity analysis map
  • Figure 40. Consent and communication framework
  • Figure 41. Adoption barrier map
  • Figure 42. Single- versus multi-cancer positioning matrix
  • Figure 43. Blood-based CRC screening adjacency map
  • Figure 44. Screening-monitoring convergence schematic
  • Figure 45. Pharma partnership structure map
  • Figure 46. Multiomics data architecture
  • Figure 47. Investment activity timeline
  • Figure 48. Regulatory watchlist map
  • Figure 49. Adoption scenario tree
  • Figure 50. Report methodology schematic
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!