PUBLISHER: Guidehouse Insights | PRODUCT CODE: 1211702
PUBLISHER: Guidehouse Insights | PRODUCT CODE: 1211702
Distribution management systems (DMSs) have been around for more than a decade, initially deployed to analyze power flows, optimize grid management, and support automation. However, utilities that deployed DMSs noted several redundancies associated with supporting different systems (e.g., outage management systems [OMSs] and SCADA) that relied on a model of the distribution network, but maintained separate and therefore incomplete models-requiring tiresome updates and cross-verification of data and effectively slowing both processes. This led to the evolution of the modular, advanced DMS, or ADMS.
Many vendors and utilities consider ADMSs to be a combination of SCADA, a DMS, and an OMS. This integrated architecture has grown in recent years to include EMS and DERMS modules, though this is not universal across vendors. This growth is a natural technological extension of ADMSs. The boundary between networks is becoming blurred, and future network operators require access to both transmission and distribution applications. The competitive landscape for ADMS is unique given the extensive requirements and growing list of modules captured under the ADMS umbrella. This has led to a smaller, more refined pool of vendors made up of traditional, large conglomerates (GE Digital, Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG, Oracle, and Hitachi Energy) and smaller, more nimble vendors (Open Systems International, Inc. [OSI], Survalent, and Minsait ACS). All are making inroads in managed services and cooperative and public utility targeting. Ultimately, the selection of an ADMS vendor depends on a utility's business objectives and constraints.
This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard compares eight ADMS vendors using ten criteria: Vision, Go-to-Market Strategy, Partners, Technology, Geographic Reach, Sales & Marketing, Product Performance, Product Portfolio & Integrations, Pricing, and Staying Power.