Picture
SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Renub Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1814948

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Renub Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1814948

United States Embolic Protection Device Market Report by Product, Application, Material, End-User, States and Company Analysis, 2025-2033

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 200 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 1-2 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PDF (Single User License)
USD 2990
PDF (5 User License + Excel)
USD 3490
PDF (Corporate License)
USD 3990

Add to Cart

United States Embolic Protection Device Market Size and Forecast 2025-2033

United States Embolic Protection Device Market is expected to reach US$ 650 million by 2033 from US$ 360 million in 2024, with a CAGR of 6.96% from 2025 to 2033. Rising cardiovascular operations, rising rates of heart disease and stroke, and technical developments targeted at enhancing patient outcomes during vascular and structural heart surgeries are the main factors propelling the US market for embolic protection devices.

United States Embolic Protection Device Market Report by Product (Distal Filter Devices, Distal Occlusion Devices, Proximal Occlusion Devices), Application (Coronary Artery Treatment, Carotid Artery Treatment, Others), Procedure (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention, Aortic Valve Stenosis (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement), Others), Material (Nitinol, Polyurethane, Usage, Disposable Devices, Re-Usable Devices), End-User (Hospitals and Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Others), States and Company Analysis, 2025-2033.

United States Embolic Protection Device Industry Overview

The aging population, the growing incidence of cardiovascular diseases, and the rise in minimally invasive surgical techniques are all contributing factors to the continuous growth of the embolic protection device (EPD) market in the United States. The purpose of embolic protection devices is to catch and eliminate embolic debris that might come loose during treatments including percutaneous coronary interventions, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and carotid artery stenting. These devices are becoming more and more important in interventional cardiology and vascular surgery because they dramatically lower the risk of perioperative stroke and other problems. The need for EPDs is anticipated to increase in tandem with the growing number of high-risk patients receiving endovascular operations, since cardiovascular disease continues to be the primary cause of mortality in the United States.

The embolic protection device (EPD) market in the US is expanding steadily due to a number of factors, including the aging population, the rising prevalence of cardiovascular disorders, and the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Embolic protection devices are used to capture and remove embolic debris that may break loose during procedures such as carotid artery stenting, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and percutaneous coronary interventions. Because they significantly reduce the risk of perioperative stroke and other complications, these devices are becoming increasingly significant in interventional cardiology and vascular surgery. Given that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, the demand for EPDs is expected to rise in line with the increasing number of high-risk patients undergoing endovascular procedures.

Nearly half of American adults, or 48.1%, or approximately 119.9 million people, had high blood pressure in 2022, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). High blood pressure is defined as having a systolic reading of more than 130 mm Hg, a diastolic reading of more than 80 mm Hg, or being on medication to treat the condition. Furthermore, according to the same source, 38 million individuals worldwide suffered from diabetes in 2024. Both disorders increase the chance of developing vascular illnesses, which frequently necessitate interventional procedures where embolic protection is essential, including carotid artery stenting or transcatheter valve replacement. Therefore, it is anticipated that the high and rising prevalence of these chronic illnesses would create a considerable demand for embolic protection devices, thereby enhancing their function in contemporary vascular treatment and supporting further market expansion.

Additionally, the major players' increased product development efforts are driving the market expansion. For example, Terumo Interventional Systems announced in May 2025 that their FDA-approved ROADSAVERTM Carotid Stent System, which is intended to be used with the Nanoparasol(R) Embolic Protection System, would be made available for purchase in the United States early. With a closed-cell design and open-cell flexibility, it is the first dual-layer micromesh carotid stent approved in the United States and is recommended for patients at high risk of carotid endarterectomy. In intricate anatomy, it improves wall apposition and aids in halting distal embolization and plaque protrusion.

Key Factors Driving the United States Embolic Protection Device Market Growth

Growing Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence and Population Aging

The market for embolic protection devices in the United States is primarily driven by the rising prevalence of cardiovascular illnesses (CVD), such as coronary artery disease and carotid artery stenosis. Since cardiovascular diseases continue to be the primary cause of death, more and more patients need interventional procedures like transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and carotid artery stenting, which have a high risk of embolic events. The need for embolic protection devices is further increased by the fact that the elderly population of the United States is more vulnerable to vascular disorders. The usage of embolic protection devices to prevent problems like stroke has grown more important as more older patients undergo minimally invasive cardiac and vascular procedures. This has fueled market expansion and encouraged healthcare professionals to use these safety solutions.

Innovative Device Designs and Technological Developments

One of the main drivers of growth in the US market for embolic protection devices is technological innovation. Technological developments have produced more effective, user-friendly tools that improve procedural safety and embolic debris capture. Improved filter materials, enhanced deliverability, and compatibility with a greater variety of vascular anatomies are characteristics of modern devices. Clinical uses have also expanded with the advent of distal protection filters and occlusion balloon devices. These developments encourage broader adoption among vascular surgeons and interventional cardiologists by lowering complications and improving patient outcomes. The goal of ongoing research and development is to produce devices that are more affordable, more adaptable, and smaller. This will increase market penetration by making the devices more widely available and accepted in healthcare facilities.

Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures Are Becoming More Popular

The market for embolic protection devices in the United States is being driven mostly by the increasing preference for less invasive cardiovascular operations. Because they are less risky and need less recovery time than open surgeries, procedures including carotid artery stenting, TAVR, and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are becoming more and more popular. These operations do, however, pose a risk of embolic events, in which strokes or other problems may result from debris that becomes dislodged during intervention. Embolic protection devices are essential instruments during such operations since they play a crucial role in reducing these hazards. The market for embolic protection devices is growing in both inpatient and outpatient settings as a result of the rise in the number of these treatments brought on by patient preferences and doctor recommendations.

Challenges in the United States Embolic Protection Device Market

Exorbitant device expenses and problems with reimbursement

The high price of these cutting-edge medical gadgets is one of the main issues facing the American market for embolic protection devices. The use of advanced materials and precise engineering in the production of embolic protection devices adds to their high cost. Adoption may be restricted by high expenses, particularly in outpatient clinics or smaller hospitals with tighter budgets. Furthermore, different insurance companies have different reimbursement guidelines for embolic protection devices, which can occasionally lead to insufficient coverage or drawn-out approval procedures. Despite the clinical advantages of these devices, this ambiguity may deter medical professionals from regularly utilizing them. Manufacturers and healthcare stakeholders must collaborate to expedite reimbursement procedures and provide clinical and economic proof of cost-effectiveness in order to guarantee wider adoption.

Complexity of Procedures and Requirement for Skilled Operators

Widespread deployment of embolic protection devices is hampered by the need for specific knowledge and training. For these devices to properly catch embolic debris during complex cardiovascular procedures without causing vessel damage or procedural difficulties, they must be placed and controlled carefully. Insufficient operator expertise may result in less-than-ideal device positioning, decreased effectiveness, and elevated patient risks. Additionally, certain healthcare facilities can be discouraged from regularly providing embolic protection due to the procedural complexity and learning curves. To give doctors and catheterization lab employees the essential skills, training courses, workshops, and certification campaigns are required. Adoption rates might continue to be restricted to high-volume, well-resourced facilities if this issue is not resolved, which would limit market expansion.

United States Embolic Protection Device Market Overview by States

The aging population, sophisticated healthcare infrastructure, and growing use of minimally invasive procedures are driving the demand for embolic protection devices in the US, particularly in areas with large volumes of cardiovascular procedures like Florida, Texas, and California. The following provides a market overview by States:

California Embolic Protection Device Market

California represents a significant share of the U.S. embolic protection device market due to its large and aging population, high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, and advanced healthcare infrastructure. The state's leading medical centers and specialized cardiovascular hospitals drive strong demand for embolic protection devices during procedures such as carotid artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). California's focus on minimally invasive interventions and the adoption of cutting-edge medical technologies further boosts market growth. Additionally, increasing public awareness about stroke prevention and cardiovascular health encourages early diagnosis and intervention. However, disparities in healthcare access between urban and rural areas remain a challenge. Overall, the state's progressive policies, research institutions, and high procedure volumes position California as a key growth market for embolic protection devices.

Texas Embolic Protection Device Market

Texas holds a prominent position in the U.S. embolic protection device market, driven by its large population and rising incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Major metropolitan areas such as Houston, Dallas, and Austin feature advanced healthcare facilities that perform a high volume of minimally invasive cardiovascular procedures, including carotid artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The state's expanding elderly population and increased awareness of stroke prevention further propel demand for embolic protection devices. Additionally, growing adoption of telehealth and outpatient surgical centers improves access to specialized care. However, challenges persist in rural areas, where limited specialist availability may restrict device utilization. Overall, Texas's robust healthcare infrastructure and growing procedural volume make it a key market for embolic protection device growth.

New York Embolic Protection Device Market

New York is a vital market for embolic protection devices in the U.S., driven by its dense population and concentration of world-class healthcare institutions. The state's leading cardiovascular centers and hospitals perform a high volume of complex minimally invasive procedures like carotid artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), where embolic protection devices are crucial for preventing stroke and other complications. New York's aging population and rising prevalence of cardiovascular diseases further boost device demand. Additionally, state initiatives promoting cardiovascular health awareness and early diagnosis support market growth. However, disparities in healthcare access across urban and rural areas remain a challenge. Overall, New York's advanced medical ecosystem and procedural volumes position it as a key contributor to the U.S. embolic protection device market expansion.

Florida Embolic Protection Device Market

Florida's embolic protection device market is expanding rapidly, fueled by its large elderly population and high incidence of cardiovascular diseases. The state is known for its numerous retirement communities, which increases demand for minimally invasive procedures such as carotid artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Florida's advanced healthcare infrastructure, including numerous specialized cardiovascular centers, supports widespread adoption of embolic protection devices to reduce perioperative complications like stroke. Additionally, growing public awareness of heart health and stroke prevention further drives market growth. However, challenges such as regional disparities in healthcare access, particularly in rural and underserved areas, can limit device utilization. Overall, Florida's demographic trends and procedural volumes make it a key market for embolic protection device adoption in the U.S.

Market Segmentations

Product

  • Distal Filter Devices
  • Distal Occlusion Devices
  • Proximal Occlusion Devices

Application

  • Coronary Artery Treatment
  • Carotid Artery Treatment
  • Others

Procedure

  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Carotid Artery Stenosis
  • Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement)
  • Others

Material

  • Nitinol
  • Polyurethane
  • Usage
  • Disposable Devices
  • Re-Usable Devices

End-User

  • Hospitals and Clinics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Others

States

  • California
  • Texas
  • New York
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Pennsylvania
  • Ohio
  • Georgia
  • New Jersey
  • Washington
  • North Carolina
  • Massachusetts
  • Virginia
  • Michigan
  • Maryland
  • Colorado
  • Tennessee
  • Indiana
  • Arizona
  • Minnesota
  • Wisconsin
  • Missouri
  • Connecticut
  • South Carolina
  • Oregon
  • Louisiana
  • Alabama
  • Kentucky
  • Rest of United States

All the Key players have been covered

  • Overviews
  • Key Person
  • Recent Developments
  • SWOT Analysis
  • Revenue Analysis

Company Analysis:

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Allium Medical Solutions Ltd.
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Cardinal Health Inc.
  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
  • Medtronic Inc.
  • Silk Road Medical Inc.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Research & Methodology

  • 2.1 Data Source
    • 2.1.1 Primary Sources
    • 2.1.2 Secondary Sources
  • 2.2 Research Approach
    • 2.2.1 Top-Down Approach
    • 2.2.2 Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.3 Forecast Projection Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Dynamics

  • 4.1 Growth Drivers
  • 4.2 Challenges

5. United States Embolic Protection Device Market

  • 5.1 Historical Market Trends
  • 5.2 Market Forecast

6. Market Share Analysis

  • 6.1 By Product
  • 6.2 By Application
  • 6.3 By Procedure
  • 6.4 By Material
  • 6.5 By Usage
  • 6.6 By End-User
  • 6.7 By States

7. Product

  • 7.1 Distal Filter Devices
    • 7.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 7.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.2 Distal Occlusion Devices
    • 7.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 7.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.3 Proximal Occlusion Devices
    • 7.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 7.3.2 Market Size & Forecast

8. Application

  • 8.1 Coronary Artery Treatment
    • 8.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 8.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.2 Carotid Artery Treatment
    • 8.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 8.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.3 Others
    • 8.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 8.3.2 Market Size & Forecast

9. Procedure

  • 9.1 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    • 9.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 9.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.2 Carotid Artery Stenosis
    • 9.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 9.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.3 Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention
    • 9.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 9.3.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.4 Aortic Valve Stenosis (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement)
    • 9.4.1 Market Analysis
    • 9.4.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.5 Others
    • 9.5.1 Market Analysis
    • 9.5.2 Market Size & Forecast

10. Material

  • 10.1 Nitinol
    • 10.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 10.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.2 Polyurethane
    • 10.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 10.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.3 Usage
    • 10.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 10.3.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.4 Disposable Devices
    • 10.4.1 Market Analysis
    • 10.4.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.5 Re-Usable Devices
    • 10.5.1 Market Analysis
    • 10.5.2 Market Size & Forecast

11. End-User

  • 11.1 Hospitals and Clinics
    • 11.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 11.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 11.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 11.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 11.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 11.3 Others
    • 11.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 11.3.2 Market Size & Forecast

12. Top States

  • 12.1 California
    • 12.1.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.1.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.2 Texas
    • 12.2.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.2.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.3 New York
    • 12.3.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.3.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.4 Florida
    • 12.4.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.4.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.5 Illinois
    • 12.5.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.5.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.6 Pennsylvania
    • 12.6.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.6.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.7 Ohio
    • 12.7.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.7.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.8 Georgia
    • 12.8.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.8.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.9 New Jersey
    • 12.9.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.9.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.10 Washington
    • 12.10.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.10.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.11 North Carolina
    • 12.11.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.11.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.12 Massachusetts
    • 12.12.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.12.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.13 Virginia
    • 12.13.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.13.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.14 Michigan
    • 12.14.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.14.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.15 Maryland
    • 12.15.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.15.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.16 Colorado
    • 12.16.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.16.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.17 Tennessee
    • 12.17.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.17.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.18 Indiana
    • 12.18.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.18.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.19 Arizona
    • 12.19.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.19.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.20 Minnesota
    • 12.20.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.20.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.21 Wisconsin
    • 12.21.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.21.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.22 Missouri
    • 12.22.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.22.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.23 Connecticut
    • 12.23.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.23.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.24 South Carolina
    • 12.24.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.24.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.25 Oregon
    • 12.25.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.25.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.26 Louisiana
    • 12.26.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.26.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.27 Alabama
    • 12.27.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.27.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.28 Kentucky
    • 12.28.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.28.2 Market Size & Forecast
  • 12.29 Rest of United States
    • 12.29.1 Market Analysis
    • 12.29.2 Market Size & Forecast

13. Value Chain Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 14.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 14.3 Degree of Competition
  • 14.4 Threat of New Entrants
  • 14.5 Threat of Substitutes

15. SWOT Analysis

  • 15.1 Strength
  • 15.2 Weakness
  • 15.3 Opportunity
  • 15.4 Threats

16. Pricing Benchmark Analysis

  • 16.1 Abbott Laboratories
  • 16.2 Allium Medical Solutions Ltd.
  • 16.3 Boston Scientific Corporation
  • 16.4 Cardinal Health Inc.
  • 16.5 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
  • 16.6 Medtronic Inc.
  • 16.7 Silk Road Medical Inc.

17. Key Players Analysis

  • 17.1 Abbott Laboratories
    • 17.1.1 Overviews
    • 17.1.2 Key Person
    • 17.1.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.1.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.1.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.2 Allium Medical Solutions Ltd.
    • 17.2.1 Overviews
    • 17.2.2 Key Person
    • 17.2.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.2.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.2.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.3 Boston Scientific Corporation
    • 17.3.1 Overviews
    • 17.3.2 Key Person
    • 17.3.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.3.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.3.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.4 Cardinal Health Inc.
    • 17.4.1 Overviews
    • 17.4.2 Key Person
    • 17.4.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.4.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.4.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.5 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
    • 17.5.1 Overviews
    • 17.5.2 Key Person
    • 17.5.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.5.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.5.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.6 Medtronic Inc.
    • 17.6.1 Overviews
    • 17.6.2 Key Person
    • 17.6.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.6.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.6.5 Revenue Analysis
  • 17.7 Silk Road Medical Inc.
    • 17.7.1 Overviews
    • 17.7.2 Key Person
    • 17.7.3 Recent Developments
    • 17.7.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 17.7.5 Revenue Analysis
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!