Picture

Questions?

+1-866-353-3335

SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: TechSci Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1881552

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: TechSci Research | PRODUCT CODE: 1881552

Uterine Manipulation Devices Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Application, By End-use, by Region, and Competition, 2020-2030F

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 182 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 2-3 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
Unprintable PDF (Single User License)
USD 4500
PDF and Excel (Multi-User License)
USD 5500
PDF and Excel (Custom Research License)
USD 8000

Add to Cart

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

The Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market, valued at USD 282.56 Million in 2024, is projected to experience a CAGR of 6.27% to reach USD 406.87 Million by 2030. Uterine manipulation devices are specialized surgical instruments designed to provide optimal control and mobility of the uterus during various gynecological procedures, primarily in minimally invasive settings. These devices, typically inserted via the cervix, enable surgeons to precisely position the uterus for improved visualization and access to pelvic structures during operations such as laparoscopic hysterectomies and myomectomies. The market's expansion is significantly driven by the increasing global preference for minimally invasive surgeries due to benefits like reduced patient recovery times, the rising prevalence of gynecological conditions, and ongoing technological advancements enhancing device precision and ergonomics.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2026-2030
Market Size 2024USD 282.56 Million
Market Size 2030USD 406.87 Million
CAGR 2025-20306.27%
Fastest Growing SegmentTotal Laparoscopy Hysterectomy
Largest MarketNorth America

Key Market Drivers

The increasing adoption of minimally invasive gynecological surgeries is a primary driver for the Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market. These procedures are highly valued for their reduced patient trauma, shorter recovery times, and lower complication rates compared to traditional open surgeries. Uterine manipulation devices are essential in these settings, enabling surgeons with enhanced control and visualization for operations like laparoscopic hysterectomies and myomectomies. According to Medscape, in April 2023, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy constituted 65.8% of total hysterectomy surgeries, reflecting a significant procedural shift towards advanced minimally invasive techniques.

Key Market Challenges

The primary impediment to the expansion of the Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market is the substantial cost associated with these advanced surgical instruments. These high expenses present a significant financial barrier for numerous healthcare facilities, particularly in developing regions, where budget allocations for medical equipment are frequently constrained. This directly limits the acquisition and widespread adoption of these devices, despite the recognized benefits of minimally invasive gynecological procedures they enable.

Key Market Trends

The integration of digital and AI-powered surgical platforms is a significant trend transforming the Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market by enhancing procedural precision and efficiency. These advanced systems provide surgeons with data-driven insights, real-time guidance, and optimized workflows, improving decision-making during complex gynecological procedures. According to MedTech Europe, the European medical technology market was estimated to be roughly €170 billion in 2024, reflecting a substantial base for digital innovation within the healthcare sector. This progression is further exemplified by companies like Medtronic, which introduced new AI algorithms for post-operative analysis in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery in April 2024, offering enhanced surgical insights and training opportunities.

Key Market Players

  • Conkin Surgical Instrument Ltd.
  • Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
  • CooperSurgical, Inc.
  • B. Braun SE
  • KARL STORZ GmbH & Co. KG
  • CONMED Corporation
  • RUDOLF Medical GmbH + Co. KG
  • LiNA Medical ApS
  • Richard Wolf GmbH
  • Utah Medical Products, Inc.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Uterine Manipulation Devices Market, By Application:

  • Total Laparoscopy Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
  • Sacrocolpopexy
  • Others

Uterine Manipulation Devices Market, By End User:

  • Hospitals & Clinics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Others

Uterine Manipulation Devices Market, By Region:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).
Product Code: 21525

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Application (Total Laparoscopy Hysterectomy, Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy, Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy, Sacrocolpopexy, Others)
    • 5.2.2. By End User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Others)
    • 5.2.3. By Region
    • 5.2.4. By Company (2024)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Application
    • 6.2.2. By End User
    • 6.2.3. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By End User
    • 6.3.2. Canada Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By End User
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By End User

7. Europe Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Application
    • 7.2.2. By End User
    • 7.2.3. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By End User
    • 7.3.2. France Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By End User
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By End User
    • 7.3.4. Italy Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By End User
    • 7.3.5. Spain Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Application
    • 8.2.2. By End User
    • 8.2.3. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By End User
    • 8.3.2. India Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By End User
    • 8.3.3. Japan Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By End User
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By End User
    • 8.3.5. Australia Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Application
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By End User

9. Middle East & Africa Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Application
    • 9.2.2. By End User
    • 9.2.3. By Country
  • 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By End User
    • 9.3.2. UAE Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By End User
    • 9.3.3. South Africa Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By End User

10. South America Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Application
    • 10.2.2. By End User
    • 10.2.3. By Country
  • 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. Brazil Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By End User
    • 10.3.2. Colombia Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By End User
    • 10.3.3. Argentina Uterine Manipulation Devices Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Application
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Uterine Manipulation Devices Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • 14.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 14.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 14.4. Power of Customers
  • 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Conkin Surgical Instrument Ltd.
    • 15.1.1. Business Overview
    • 15.1.2. Products & Services
    • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
    • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
    • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
  • 15.2. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
  • 15.3. CooperSurgical, Inc.
  • 15.4. B. Braun SE
  • 15.5. KARL STORZ GmbH & Co. KG
  • 15.6. CONMED Corporation
  • 15.7. RUDOLF Medical GmbH + Co. KG
  • 15.8. LiNA Medical ApS
  • 15.9. Richard Wolf GmbH
  • 15.10. Utah Medical Products, Inc.

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer

Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!