Automated Container Terminal Market by Offering, Automation Level, Application, Terminal Size

Description

List of Tables

[196 Pages Report] The Automated Container Terminal Market size was estimated at USD 12.20 billion in 2023 and expected to reach USD 12.84 billion in 2024, at a CAGR 5.38% to reach USD 17.62 billion by 2030.

An automated container terminal is a state-of-the-art facility encompassing a combination of computerized control systems, advanced machinery, and robotic equipment engineered to work in unison to enhance port operations' efficiency, safety, and reliability. These systems are principally applied in international and domestic ports engaged in maritime trade to optimize processes, reduce labor costs, and increase safety and efficiency within port terminal operations. Increased international trade activities have increased the demand for efficient container handling systems. Further, innovations in automation technology, such as robotics, artificial intelligence(AI), and IoT, are crucial in automated container terminals. Moreover, stricter environmental laws are promoting port operators to invest in green technologies, including automated systems that enhance operational efficiency and reduce emissions. However, the high initial investment costs required to deploy automated systems may be prohibitive for some port operators. Furthermore, integrating new automated systems with existing port infrastructure and workflows can be challenging and require specialized expertise. Nevertheless, implementing 5G networks in ports for faster and more reliable data transfer and enhancing real-time decision-making in operations is expected to bolster the deployment of automated container terminals. Adoption of electric and hybrid container handling equipment leading to lower operating costs & sustainability supports market expansion.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2023]	USD 12.20 billion
Estimated Year [2024]	USD 12.84 billion
Forecast Year [2030]	USD 17.62 billion
CAGR (%)	5.38%

Offering: Increasing demand for equipment owing to the automation trend

The equipment used in automated container terminals includes cranes, automated guided vehicles (AGVs), automated stacking cranes (ASCs), straddle carriers, and shuttle carriers. Each of these plays a crucial role in the efficiency and effectiveness of container handling. The preference for specific equipment is based on the throughput requirement, terminal layout, budget, and flexibility. High-volume terminals prefer solutions such as automated stacking cranes that maximize space utilization and throughput. In contrast, terminals with variable peak times might prefer the flexibility offered by AGVs or shuttle carriers. Services in automated container terminals encompass a broad range, including design, consulting, maintenance, and support. These services ensure seamless operation of the equipment and software systems in place. Terminals seeking to optimize existing resources may prioritize consulting services, while those implementing new solutions might look for comprehensive design and support services. Maintenance services are critical across the board, as they ensure the longevity and reliability of the equipment and software. Software is the backbone of automated container terminals, including terminal operating systems (TOS), equipment control systems (ECS), and berth planning software. These are integral to achieving high levels of coordination and efficiency. The choice of software depends on compatibility with existing systems, ease of integration, customization needs, and the terminal's operational complexity. Large terminals with intricate operations require sophisticated TOS with advanced features such as real-time optimization and data analytics.

Automation Level: Suitability of fully automated terminals for large scale ports to attain peak efficiency, safety, and consistency

Fully automated terminals represent cutting-edge container handling technology employing unmanned ground vehicles, automated stacking cranes, and remotely operated ship-to-shore cranes supported with sophisticated software systems. They are designed to deliver peak efficiency, safety, and consistency while significantly reducing the need for manual labor, thereby minimizing human error and enhancing operational safety. They are best suited for large-scale ports with high throughput requirements that are looking to optimize resource utilization and future-proof their operations. Semi-automated terminals are a hybrid solution where certain elements of the container handling process, typically the yard operations, are automated. Ship-to-shore cranes may still be operated manually, but the transfer and stacking of containers are conducted by automated straddle carriers or automated guided vehicles. Such terminals offer a balance between investment and the benefits of automation. They are ideal for medium-sized to large terminals that seek some level of automation to streamline operations without committing to the full cost and complexity of a fully automated terminal.

Application: Preferences for clear greenfield terminals owing to advanced planning and incorporation of cutting-edge technologies

Brownfield terminals refer to modernizing or upgrading existing port facilities to incorporate automated technology. This approach is typically adopted by ports with infrastructure constraints or in urban areas where expansion is limited. The need for automation in brownfield terminals arises from the requirement to improve efficiency, enhance safety, and increase competitiveness without the option for physical expansion. Greenfield terminals, in contrast, are new port facilities designed and built from scratch with automation as a central feature. These projects allow for the most advanced planning and incorporation of cutting-edge technologies, offering efficiency and throughput benefits that older ports may not be able to achieve. The selection of a greenfield approach is often based on the need for additional capacity, strategic positioning, or the lack of existing port facilities in a region. The preference for greenfield terminals generally arises when there is capacity for new ports, a geographical advantage, or a long-term vision for port development. It may also be preferred when a clear pathway for technological advancements can be seamlessly integrated into the port infrastructure from the outset.

Terminal Size: Proliferation of large terminals for high-volume traffic, & maximized throughput

Automated large terminals are exceedingly complex operational environments that typically handle millions of TEUs (Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units) per year. The preference for large terminals revolves around optimizing high-volume traffic, maximizing throughput, reducing operational downtime, and advancing safety measures. These terminals benefit from comprehensive automation solutions, including automated stacking cranes, guided vehicles, and advanced terminal operating systems. Medium-sized automated terminals typically serve regional markets and are designed to handle moderate levels of container throughput. These terminals juggle efficiency and cost-effectiveness, seeking scalable automation solutions that significantly improve yard management and vessel turnaround times. Small automated terminals often cater to niche markets or support specialized cargo handling, aiming to enhance operational capabilities within limited spatial and financial constraints. Automation technology for small terminals focuses on modularity and flexibility, allowing for stepwise investments into semi-automated systems or full automation where feasible.

Regional Insights

The demand for automated container terminals in the Americas is influenced by several key factors, including efforts to enhance port efficiency and competitiveness in response to increased trade volumes, particularly with the expansion of the Panama Canal. Additionally, there is a strong push towards reducing environmental impact through lower emissions and energy consumption. Labor cost considerations and the need to address safety concerns by reducing human involvement in hazardous operations are also significant drivers for the deployment of automated container terminals. Major investments in port infrastructure, coupled with advancements in technology that make automation more accessible and reliable, continue to bolster the demand in the region. In the EU region, with a strong emphasis on sustainability, leading to a rise in eco-friendly ACT initiatives, major countries are pioneers in green port technologies while focusing on the efficient throughput management offered by automated ports. In the Middle East, major oil-exporting nations are investing heavily in ACTs to diversify their economies and streamline trade operations. The Asia Pacific region showcases significant growth in demand for automated container terminals (ACTs) due to substantial trade volume and ongoing investments in port infrastructure from major economies. Moreover, the modernization of ports, leading to a surge in technological advancements and patent filings related to ACTs and integration of IoT and AI into port structures to reduce turnaround times and handle larger international trade volumes efficiently, has supported the market growth.

FPNV Positioning Matrix

The FPNV Positioning Matrix is pivotal in evaluating the Automated Container Terminal Market. It offers a comprehensive assessment of vendors, examining key metrics related to Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction. This in-depth analysis empowers users to make well-informed decisions aligned with their requirements. Based on the evaluation, the vendors are then categorized into four distinct quadrants representing varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital (V).

Market Share Analysis

The Market Share Analysis is a comprehensive tool that provides an insightful and in-depth examination of the current state of vendors in the Automated Container Terminal Market. By meticulously comparing and analyzing vendor contributions in terms of overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can offer companies a greater understanding of their performance and the challenges they face when competing for market share. Additionally, this analysis provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of the sector, including factors such as accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits observed over the base year period studied. With this expanded level of detail, vendors can make more informed decisions and devise effective strategies to gain a competitive edge in the market.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Automated Container Terminal Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include ABB Ltd., akquinet port consulting GmbH, APM Terminals, Camco Technologies, Cargotec Corporation, Cavotec SA, CMA CGM, CyberLogitec Co., Ltd., DP World Limited, Evergreen Marine Corp., IDENTEC GROUP AG, INFORM Institut fur Operations Research und Management GmbH, Infyz Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Kaleris, Konecranes Oyj, Kunz GmbH, Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd., ORBCOMM Inc., t42 Tracking Solutions, Tideworks by Carrix, Inc., TMEIC Corporation, Total Soft Bank Ltd., Toyota Industries Corporation, Tratos Cavi SpA by ALMA S.r.l., and ZPMC Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co. Ltd..

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Automated Container Terminal Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Offering
- Equipment
- Services
- Software

Automation Level
- Fully Automated Terminal
- Semi-Automated Terminal

Application
- Brownfield Terminals
- Greenfield Terminals

Terminal Size
- Large Terminal
- Medium Terminal
- Small Terminal

Region
- Americas
  - Argentina
  - Brazil
  - Canada
  - Mexico
  - United States
    - California
    - Florida
    - Illinois
    - New York
    - Ohio
    - Pennsylvania
    - Texas
- Asia-Pacific
  - Australia
  - China
  - India
  - Indonesia
  - Japan
  - Malaysia
  - Philippines
  - Singapore
  - South Korea
  - Taiwan
  - Thailand
  - Vietnam

Europe, Middle East & Africa
- Denmark
- Egypt
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Israel
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Nigeria
- Norway
- Poland
- Qatar
- Russia
- Saudi Arabia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom

The report offers valuable insights on the following aspects:

1. Market Penetration: It presents comprehensive information on the market provided by key players.

2. Market Development: It delves deep into lucrative emerging markets and analyzes the penetration across mature market segments.

3. Market Diversification: It provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographic regions, recent developments, and investments.

4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: It conducts an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players.

5. Product Development & Innovation: It offers intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments.

The report addresses key questions such as:

1. What is the market size and forecast of the Automated Container Terminal Market?

2. Which products, segments, applications, and areas should one consider investing in over the forecast period in the Automated Container Terminal Market?

3. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Automated Container Terminal Market?

4. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Automated Container Terminal Market?

5. Which modes and strategic moves are suitable for entering the Automated Container Terminal Market?

Product Code: MRR-69324464D2A0

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

5.1. Market Dynamics
- 5.1.1. Drivers
  - 5.1.1.1. Growing demand for large container ships and the need for efficient port operations
  - 5.1.1.2. High preferences toward automated equipment handling systems
- 5.1.2. Restraints
  - 5.1.2.1. High cost involved in deploying and maintaining automated container terminals
- 5.1.3. Opportunities
  - 5.1.3.1. Ongoing expansion and development of automated container terminals
  - 5.1.3.2. Rising investments to expand container capacities worldwide
- 5.1.4. Challenges
  - 5.1.4.1. Technical complications in the integration and development of automated container terminal
5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
- 5.2.1. Offering: Increasing demand for equipment owing to the automation trend
- 5.2.2. Automation Level: Suitability of fully automated terminals for large scale ports to attain peak efficiency, safety, and consistency
- 5.2.3. Application: Preferences for clear greenfield terminals owing to advanced planning and incorporation of cutting-edge technologies
- 5.2.4. Terminal Size: Proliferation of large terminals for high-volume traffic, & maximized throughput
5.3. Market Disruption Analysis
5.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- 5.4.1. Threat of New Entrants
- 5.4.2. Threat of Substitutes
- 5.4.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
- 5.4.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 5.4.5. Industry Rivalry
5.5. Value Chain & Critical Path Analysis
5.6. Pricing Analysis
5.7. Technology Analysis
5.8. Patent Analysis
5.9. Trade Analysis
5.10. Regulatory Framework Analysis

6. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Offering

6.1. Introduction
6.2. Equipment
6.3. Services
6.4. Software

7. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Automation Level

7.1. Introduction
7.2. Fully Automated Terminal
7.3. Semi-Automated Terminal

8. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Application

8.1. Introduction
8.2. Brownfield Terminals
8.3. Greenfield Terminals

9. Automated Container Terminal Market, by Terminal Size

9.1. Introduction
9.2. Large Terminal
9.3. Medium Terminal
9.4. Small Terminal

10. Americas Automated Container Terminal Market

10.1. Introduction
10.2. Argentina
10.3. Brazil
10.4. Canada
10.5. Mexico
10.6. United States

11. Asia-Pacific Automated Container Terminal Market

11.1. Introduction
11.2. Australia
11.3. China
11.4. India
11.5. Indonesia
11.6. Japan
11.7. Malaysia
11.8. Philippines
11.9. Singapore
11.10. South Korea
11.11. Taiwan
11.12. Thailand
11.13. Vietnam

12. Europe, Middle East & Africa Automated Container Terminal Market

12.1. Introduction
12.2. Denmark
12.3. Egypt
12.4. Finland
12.5. France
12.6. Germany
12.7. Israel
12.8. Italy
12.9. Netherlands
12.10. Nigeria
12.11. Norway
12.12. Poland
12.13. Qatar
12.14. Russia
12.15. Saudi Arabia
12.16. South Africa
12.17. Spain
12.18. Sweden
12.19. Switzerland
12.20. Turkey
12.21. United Arab Emirates
12.22. United Kingdom

13. Competitive Landscape

13.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
13.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
13.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
- 13.3.1. Philippine-Owned Australian Container Terminal Vict Acquires Two Automated Cranes from China's Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries
- 13.3.2. Evergreen Launches Taiwan's 1st Fully-Automated Container Terminal
- 13.3.3. Identec Solutions Granted USD 11 Million for Container Terminal Automation Project
13.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

14. Competitive Portfolio

14.1. Key Company Profiles
14.2. Key Product Portfolio