Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market by Component Type, Landing Gear Configuration, Aircraft Type, Material Type, End User

List of Tables

The Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market was valued at USD 8.96 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 9.61 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.05%, reaching USD 15.42 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 8.96 billion
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 9.61 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 15.42 billion
CAGR (%)	8.05%

Comprehensive orientation to landing gear component systems, supply chain interplay, and the operational drivers that determine procurement and maintenance priorities

This executive summary opens with a focused orientation to aircraft landing gear components and the ecosystems they support, providing a concise foundation for decision-makers across engineering, procurement, and aftermarket operations. Landing gear systems combine mechanical complexity with rigorous safety and certification demands, and they function at the intersection of airframe integration, hydraulic and electro-mechanical actuation, and wear-prone rotating assemblies. Understanding the interplay among these elements is essential for prioritizing supplier relationships, qualifying spares inventories, and aligning MRO capabilities with fleet composition.

The opening analysis clarifies component groupings, supply chain nodes, and the performance drivers that matter most to operators and OEMs. It underscores how component choices-ranging from actuation architecture to brake material selection-affect weight, energy consumption, maintainability, and total ownership cost over asset life. It also frames regulatory and certification pressures that shape design cycles and aftermarket approvals, setting the stage for subsequent sections that analyze transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for industry leaders. By establishing common terminology and focusing on commercially material issues, this introduction aligns stakeholders for rapid assimilation of the technical, economic, and strategic implications contained in the full report.

Converging forces of electrification, additive manufacturing, digital condition monitoring, and sustainability that are remapping supplier strategies and maintenance models

The landscape for aircraft landing gear components is undergoing simultaneous technical, commercial, and regulatory shifts that will define supplier viability and fleet economics over the next technology cycle. Electrification of actuation is progressing from proof-of-concept to integration programs, as electro-mechanical actuators gain traction against hydraulic systems in targeted applications due to better controllability, easier diagnostic integration, and reduced hydraulic plumbing weight. At the same time, advances in materials and additive manufacturing are beginning to alter lifecycle strategies: high-performance alloys and titanium-compatible AM techniques streamline low-volume, high-complexity part production while challenging traditional casting and forging supply models.

Concurrently, digitalization is reshaping MRO and asset management; condition-based maintenance enabled by embedded sensors and prognostics is reducing unscheduled removals and optimizing overhaul timing. This transition increases the value of components with built-in condition monitoring and heightens the importance of secure data architectures between OEMs, suppliers, and operators. Supply chain risk management has moved center stage: supplier diversification, nearshoring of critical subassemblies, and longer-term contractual frameworks are being used to safeguard continuity. Finally, sustainability considerations-driven by airline commitments and airframe OEM targets-are prompting greater scrutiny of component lifecycle emissions, recyclability, and the fuel-burn impacts of weight reductions, with design trade-offs increasingly evaluated through environmental performance lenses. These combined shifts demand adaptive sourcing strategies, rapid qualification protocols for new technologies, and a stronger emphasis on interoperable diagnostics across suppliers and platforms.

How the 2025 United States tariff measures reshaped sourcing economics, accelerated nearshoring, and compelled supply chain reconfiguration across multiple supplier tiers

The cumulative impact of United States tariffs implemented in 2025 has created measurable pressure across multiple tiers of the landing gear component supply base, altering cost structures, procurement routes, and supplier risk assessments. Tariff measures applied to specific classes of imported mechanical and electro-mechanical parts prompted a re-evaluation of sourcing strategies for assemblies such as actuators, valves, and precision-machined strut components. As a direct consequence, many OEMs and tier suppliers accelerated qualification of alternative sources outside the impacted tariff jurisdictions, while some pursued vertical integration for selected subcomponents to regain cost predictability and certification control.

Importantly, the tariffs amplified the attractiveness of local manufacturing investments and established a renewed emphasis on nearshoring for critical systems. For aerospace manufacturers that depend on globalized networks for hoses and tubing, pumps, reservoirs, filters, and brake assemblies, the added tariff layer increased the total landed cost for certain imports and shortened the runway for suppliers operating with thin margins. These dynamics led to more aggressive negotiations on long-term contracts, higher inventory buffers for critical spares, and the adoption of dual-sourcing strategies to mitigate single-country exposure. Simultaneously, tariffs influenced product development priorities: suppliers started to emphasize modular designs and standardized interfaces to enable easier source substitution and reduce requalification lead times. While tariffs created short-term cost shocks and reconfiguration costs, they also catalyzed supply chain resilience measures that can reduce systemic risk over the medium term, provided firms invest strategically in alternative capacities and maintain rigorous qualification pathways for the altered supply base.

Actionable segmentation insights revealing how component type, end user, aircraft type, technology, and gear location shape design priorities and aftermarket strategies

Segment-level behavior in landing gear components varies markedly by component type, end user, aircraft type, technology, and gear location, producing distinct commercial imperatives for suppliers and operators. Based on component type, the market requires separate engagement strategies for actuators, hydraulic systems, struts, and wheels and brakes; within actuators, differentiation between electric actuators and hydraulic actuators drives divergent validation pathways and aftermarket support models, while hydraulic systems fragment into hoses and tubing, pumps, reservoirs and filters, and valves, each with unique maintenance cycles and certification touchpoints. Struts divide into mechanical struts and oleopneumatic struts, which present contrasting failure modes and overhaul requirements, and wheels and brakes split into brakes and wheels where material selection and thermal management determine overhaul intervals and consumable schedules.

End-user segmentation further informs product and service design: business jets, commercial aircraft, and military aircraft have discrete procurement cadences, regulatory oversight, and lifecycle expectations that affect warranty structures, spare pool size, and aftermarket revenue potential. Aircraft type segmentation between fixed wing and rotary wing imposes divergent loads, kinematic constraints, and certification standards that influence design margins, materials choices, and maintenance frequency. Technology segmentation between electro-mechanical and hydraulic approaches reveals trade-offs in system mass, energy usage, maintainability, and digital diagnostic capability, which in turn affect operator total cost of ownership and retrofit decisions. Finally, gear-type segmentation into main gear and nose gear dictates load distribution, structural integration, and brake sizing considerations, thereby shaping supplier specialization and component qualification pathways. Collectively, these segmentation lenses create a matrix of technical and commercial priorities that suppliers must navigate to align product roadmaps and aftersales services with the precise requirements of each customer segment.

Comparative regional dynamics that shape manufacturing footprints, MRO networks, and localized sourcing strategies across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics for landing gear components are driven by fleet composition, domestic manufacturing capabilities, regulatory regimes, and investment incentives that influence sourcing and MRO footprints across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, established OEMs and a large commercial fleet create sustained demand for both original equipment and aftermarket services, while the presence of advanced MRO networks supports rapid turnaround and on-wing support models. This region also houses significant research and development centers which accelerate adoption of electro-mechanical actuation and predictive maintenance technologies, reinforcing a market preference for components with integrated diagnostics and proven supply chain traceability.

Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the market blends legacy fleet support with aggressive modernization programs and a strong regulatory focus on safety and environmental performance, prompting suppliers to prioritize lightweight materials and low-emissions lifecycle solutions. The EMEA region's diverse regulatory landscape requires suppliers to operate with flexible certification strategies and established local partnerships to enable rapid entry into national markets. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid fleet expansion among commercial carriers and growing defense modernization programs create a large addressable demand pool, but regionalization trends and currency considerations push many global suppliers to develop localized manufacturing, joint ventures, or licensed production agreements. Combined, these regional dynamics emphasize the need for tailored commercial terms, local technical support capability, and adaptable qualification strategies that reflect each region's unique operating environment and regulatory expectations.

Competitive imperatives for suppliers driven by certification strength, digital-enabled maintenance, and strategic partnerships across the component lifecycle

Competitive positioning among leading companies in the landing gear component domain centers on technical differentiation, certification track record, aftermarket service breadth, and strategic partnerships across the supply chain. Market leaders demonstrate deep domain expertise across actuator systems, hydraulic assemblies, strut manufacturing, and wheel and brake technology, backed by comprehensive qualification credentials and long-standing relationships with airframe OEMs and major airlines. Companies that integrate diagnostics and digital maintenance services into component designs gain a competitive edge by enabling condition-based maintenance and reducing unscheduled downtime for operators.

Mid-tier suppliers and specialized firms often compete on agility, cost-effective manufacturing, and niche technical capabilities-such as advanced brake materials, additive manufacturing for complex housings, or high-precision valve assemblies. These players can capture opportunities through rapid prototyping, targeted certification efforts, and partnerships with MRO providers to bundle replacement parts with overhaul services. Strategic alliances, licensing arrangements, and localized production agreements are common tools used to enter new regions or to comply with defense offset requirements. Across the competitive landscape, success requires a coordinated approach to product lifecycle management, clear aftermarket service propositions, and the ability to respond to evolving specifications from airframe integrators while maintaining rigorous quality and compliance systems.

Practical recommendations for suppliers and OEMs to strengthen resilience, accelerate digitalization, and expand aftermarket revenue through targeted design and sourcing actions

Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable measures to safeguard operations, accelerate innovation, and capture aftermarket value. First, prioritize investments in modular design and standardized interfaces that reduce requalification costs and enable faster supplier substitution when disruptions occur. Second, accelerate integration of condition monitoring and prognostic health management into component linecards to support predictive MRO, which will increase service revenue and improve fleet availability for operator customers. Third, pursue a dual-path sourcing strategy that balances nearshoring for critical subassemblies with validated offshore suppliers to optimize cost and resilience while maintaining certification continuity.

Next, invest in manufacturing flexibility through selective adoption of additive manufacturing for low-volume complex parts and in automation for repeatable quality in high-precision machining; these moves will shorten lead times and reduce inventory carrying costs. Cultivate strategic partnerships with MRO networks and logistics providers to offer bundled aftermarket services and to ensure rapid turnaround capabilities in key regions. Finally, align product development with emerging sustainability requirements by prioritizing lightweight materials, recyclable components, and process improvements that reduce energy consumption; communicate these attributes clearly to airline and regulator stakeholders to differentiate offerings in procurement and upgrade cycles. Implementing these recommendations requires cross-functional coordination among engineering, procurement, and commercial teams, backed by measurable KPIs that track time-to-qualification, spare-part availability, and aftermarket service margins.

Robust multi-source research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and scenario analysis to ensure rigorous and actionable insights

The research methodology underpinning this report synthesizes primary engagement with industry stakeholders, technical analysis of component architectures, and triangulation against publicly available regulatory and certification documentation. Primary inputs included structured interviews with engineers, supply chain managers, and aftermarket leaders across OEMs, tier suppliers, and MRO providers, combined with technical briefings on recent actuation and brake system developments. Secondary analysis drew on component-level performance literature, certification agency guidance, and trend signals from fleet maintenance bulletins to validate failure modes, overhaul triggers, and qualification timelines.

Analytical frameworks focused on segmentation across component type, end user, aircraft type, technology, and gear location to map product-to-customer fit and to surface differential service requirements. Scenario testing explored supply chain disruption responses, tariff-induced sourcing shifts, and technology adoption pathways to assess resilience and strategic options. Quality controls included cross-validation of interview findings with multiple independent sources, peer review by subject-matter experts, and a documented audit trail for data provenance. The resulting methodology ensures that the report's insights are grounded in practical engineering realities, current regulatory expectations, and commercial considerations that matter to executives making sourcing, investment, and aftermarket service decisions.

Synthesis of technical, commercial, and supply chain imperatives that define strategic priorities and investment pathways for landing gear component stakeholders

In conclusion, aircraft landing gear components sit at a strategic intersection of technological change, regulatory rigor, and supply chain complexity that compels decisive action from suppliers and operators alike. The migration toward electrified actuation, coupled with digital prognostics and evolving materials capabilities, creates opportunities for suppliers who can reduce system mass, improve maintainability, and integrate diagnostics without compromising certification timelines. At the same time, macroeconomic and policy shifts, including tariff measures and regionalization trends, require firms to re-examine sourcing footprints, invest in qualification flexibility, and deepen partnerships with MRO providers to protect operational readiness.

To remain competitive, companies must balance short-term resilience measures-such as dual sourcing and localized production-with longer-term investments in design modularity, additive manufacturing, and sustainability-focused materials. Firms that execute on these fronts while maintaining stringent quality systems and clear aftermarket propositions will enhance their ability to capture value across the equipment lifecycle. The combined technical, commercial, and regional insights within this summary provide a strategic foundation for leadership teams to make informed choices on product roadmaps, supplier strategies, and investment priorities that align with evolving fleet needs and regulatory expectations.

Product Code: MRR-F14BA1B341DE

1. Preface

1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Component Type

8.1. Actuators
- 8.1.1. Electric Actuators
- 8.1.2. Hydraulic Actuators
8.2. Hydraulic Systems
- 8.2.1. Hoses And Tubing
- 8.2.2. Pumps
- 8.2.3. Reservoirs And Filters
- 8.2.4. Valves
8.3. Struts
- 8.3.1. Mechanical Struts
- 8.3.2. Oleopneumatic Struts
8.4. Wheels And Brakes
- 8.4.1. Brakes
- 8.4.2. Wheels

9. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Landing Gear Configuration

9.1. Tricycle Landing Gear
9.2. Tandem Landing Gear
9.3. Tailwheel Landing Gear
9.4. Multi Bogie Landing Gear
9.5. Skid And Floats

10. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Aircraft Type

10.1. Commercial Transport Aircraft
10.2. Regional Transport Aircraft
10.3. Business Jets
10.4. General Aviation Aircraft
10.5. Military Combat Aircraft
10.6. Military Transport And Special Mission Aircraft
10.7. Rotary Wing Aircraft
10.8. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

11. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Material Type

11.1. High Strength Steels
11.2. Aluminum Alloys
11.3. Titanium Alloys
11.4. Composite Materials
- 11.4.1. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites
- 11.4.2. Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites
- 11.4.3. Hybrid Composite Structures
11.5. Advanced Coatings And Surface Treatments
- 11.5.1. Corrosion Protection Coatings
- 11.5.2. Wear Resistant Coatings
- 11.5.3. Low Friction Coatings

12. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by End User

12.1. Original Equipment Manufacturers
12.2. Airlines And Fleet Operators
12.3. Military And Defense Operators
12.4. Maintenance Repair And Overhaul Providers
12.5. Leasing Companies

13. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Region

13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Group

14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO

15. Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market, by Country

15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea

16. United States Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market

17. China Aircraft Landing Gear Components Market

18. Competitive Landscape

18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
18.5. AAR Corp.
18.6. CIRCOR International, Inc.
18.7. Collins Aerospace, Inc.
18.8. Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.
18.9. Eaton Corporation plc
18.10. GKN Aerospace Services Limited
18.11. Honeywell International Inc.
18.12. Heroux-Devtek Inc.
18.13. Liebherr-International AG
18.14. Magellan Aerospace Corporation
18.15. Meggitt PLC
18.16. Moog Inc.
18.17. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
18.18. Revima Group
18.19. Safran Landing Systems
18.20. Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.
18.21. Triumph Group, Inc.