SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117111

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117111

KRAS-Targeted Therapy | Oncology Modality Intelligence | US, EU5, Japan & China

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 120 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 7-10 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PPT (Single User License)
USD 5500
PPT (2 - 3 User License)
USD 5950
PPT (Site License - Up to 10 Users)
USD 9500
PPT (Enterprise License)
USD 13500

Add to Cart

KRAS spent four decades as oncology's most famous undruggable target, and its arrival as a druggable one has played out unevenly in Japan. Amgen's Lumakras is the only KRAS inhibitor approved and reimbursed in the country, which makes Japan simultaneously a validated market for the class and a strikingly under-contested one: adagrasib, approved in the US and Europe under Bristol Myers Squibb's ownership since the Mirati acquisition, has no Japanese entry. For a country carrying heavy colorectal and pancreatic cancer burdens - tumor types where KRAS mutation is the rule rather than the exception - the distance between biological relevance and therapeutic availability is unusually wide.

The tension is about which generation of the class Japan gets, and when. First-generation G12C inhibitors validated the target but left resistance, combination, and allele-coverage questions open. The next wave - Revolution Medicines' RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitors led by daraxonrasib, Lilly's olomorasib, Roche's divarasib, and Chinese G12C agents from Jacobio and GenFleet - is designed around those weaknesses, and the pivotal programs now running will decide whether KRAS targeting expands from a NSCLC niche into the pancreatic and colorectal mainfields that matter most in Japan. Companion-diagnostic attach, combination partner strategy, and the sponsor-recruitment dynamics of Japan's unapproved-drug lists all sit unresolved around that core question.

This report maps the KRAS class from a Japanese vantage point. It explains the allele biology and testing infrastructure that define treatable populations, profiles Lumakras's Japanese position and the CodeBreaK program behind it, and walks asset by asset through the competing pipelines: adagrasib's absent entry, daraxonrasib and zoldonrasib, olomorasib, divarasib, Frontier Medicines, Erasca's pan-RAS approach, Verastem's pathway combinations, and the Chinese G12C developers. Chapters cover combination architectures, resistance mechanisms, biomarker-testing economics, and the BD opening created by Japan's thin coverage of the class.

The report serves biotech BD teams weighing Japan rights and licensing, companion-diagnostics firms, investors pricing KRAS exposure, and Japanese companies seeking in-licensing opportunities. It provides allele-level and program-level detail suited to deal screening and market-entry judgment.

Scope and Coverage: The report covers approved and pipeline KRAS-targeted agents relevant to Japan across NSCLC, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers, including G12C inhibitors, RAS(ON) multi-selective agents, pan-RAS programs, and pathway combinations. It profiles Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Revolution Medicines, Lilly, Roche, Frontier Medicines, Erasca, Verastem, Jacobio, and GenFleet, and addresses biomarker-testing and regulatory pathways.

Report Highlights:

  • Explains Lumakras's Japanese position and the CodeBreaK trial program
  • Analyzes adagrasib's absence from Japan and the resulting market structure
  • Profiles RAS(ON) programs: daraxonrasib, zoldonrasib, and the RASolute trials
  • Covers olomorasib, divarasib, and Chinese G12C agents from Jacobio and GenFleet
  • Maps allele-specific treatable populations across NSCLC, CRC, and pancreatic cancer
  • Frames Japan entry, licensing, and companion-diagnostic opportunities in the class
Product Code: JPH-031

Table of Content

1. Executive Summary

2. KRAS-Targeted Therapy: Modality Overview and Mechanism Landscape

3. Global Pipeline and Deal Activity

4. Key Programs, Clinical Readouts, and Evidence Status

5. Japan Relevance: Trials, Approvals, and Partnerships

6. Regulatory and Pricing Considerations in Japan

7. Competitive Positioning and Valuation Considerations

8. Watch Items and Upcoming Catalysts

9. Appendix: Methodology and Sources

Companies Mentioned

  • Amgen (US) - Lumakras (sotorasib); only approved KRAS G12C inhibitor in Japan
  • Bristol Myers Squibb (US) - adagrasib (Krazati) via the Mirati acquisition; no Japan entry to date
  • Revolution Medicines (US) - RAS(ON) inhibitors including daraxonrasib and zoldonrasib
  • Eli Lilly (US) - olomorasib KRAS G12C program
  • Roche (CH) - divarasib KRAS G12C program
  • Frontier Medicines (US) - KRAS G12C inhibitor program
  • Erasca (US) - pan-RAS and RAS-pathway pipeline
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (DE) - KRAS inhibitor research programs
  • Verastem (US) - RAS/MAPK pathway combinations
  • Jacobio (CN) - glecirasib KRAS G12C inhibitor
  • GenFleet (CN) - fulzerasib KRAS G12C inhibitor licensed to Innovent
Product Code: JPH-031

List of Tables

  • Table 1. KRAS Biology: Allele Distribution and Switch-Region Druggability
  • Table 2. KRAS Mutation Landscape Across Japanese NSCLC, CRC, and Pancreatic Populations
  • Table 3. KRAS Testing Infrastructure in Japan: NGS Panels and PCR Assays
  • Table 4. Companion-Diagnostic Attach Models for KRAS-Targeted Therapy
  • Table 5. Lumakras (Sotorasib): Mechanism and Japanese Label
  • Table 6. CodeBreaK Trial Program: Designs Across Lines and Combinations
  • Table 7. Lumakras Combination Development: Immunotherapy and SHP2 Pairings
  • Table 8. Adagrasib (Krazati): KRYSTAL Program and US-EU Status
  • Table 9. Adagrasib's Japan Absence: Regulatory and Commercial Explanation Framework
  • Table 10. Bristol Myers Squibb Mirati Acquisition: KRAS Asset Integration
  • Table 11. Revolution Medicines RAS(ON) Platform: Mechanistic Differentiation
  • Table 12. Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236): Program Design in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Table 13. RASolute 302 and Pancreatic Pivotal Strategy
  • Table 14. Zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) and Allele-Selective RAS(ON) Programs
  • Table 15. Elironrasib and RAS(ON) G12C-Selective Development
  • Table 16. Lilly Olomorasib: Program Design and Combination Strategy
  • Table 17. Roche Divarasib: Program Design and Inavolisib Combination Context
  • Table 18. Frontier Medicines KRAS G12C Program
  • Table 19. Erasca Pan-RAS and RAS-Pathway Pipeline
  • Table 20. Verastem RAS/MAPK Combination Programs: Avutometinib Context
  • Table 21. Boehringer Ingelheim KRAS Research Programs
  • Table 22. Jacobio Glecirasib: China Development and Out-Licensing Position
  • Table 23. GenFleet Fulzerasib and the Innovent Licensing Relationship
  • Table 24. China KRAS Developer Landscape and Licensing-Out Record
  • Table 25. Resistance Mechanisms to G12C Inhibition: RTK, MAPK, and Allele Switching
  • Table 26. Combination Architecture Framework for KRAS-Targeted Regimens
  • Table 27. G12D and Pan-KRAS Programs Relevant to Japan's CRC and Pancreatic Burden
  • Table 28. SOS1, SHP2, and Downstream Pathway Targeting Programs
  • Table 29. KRAS-Targeted Therapy in Japanese Treatment Guidelines
  • Table 30. PMDA Pathways and Unapproved-Drug List Status for KRAS Agents
  • Table 31. Sponsor-Recruitment Dynamics for KRAS Assets Lacking Japan Sponsors
  • Table 32. Trial-Enrollment Competition Among KRAS Programs in Asia
  • Table 33. Biomarker-Defined Population Funnels by Allele and Tumor Type
  • Table 34. Testing Turnaround and Referral Implications for KRAS-Directed Care
  • Table 35. Pricing and Reimbursement Precedents for Targeted Agents in Japan
  • Table 36. Competitive Positioning Matrix: KRAS Assets by Allele, Modality, and Stage
  • Table 37. Deal Benchmarks for KRAS-Asset Licensing
  • Table 38. Japan Entry Models for KRAS Developers: Solo, Partner, and Skip
  • Table 39. Scenario Framework: KRAS Class Coverage of Japan's Tumor Burden
  • Table 40. Risk Register: Resistance, Combination Toxicity, and Competitive Timing
  • Table 41. Indicator Dashboard for KRAS Class Monitoring
  • Table 42. Due-Diligence Checklist for KRAS-Asset Licensing
  • Table 43. Japanese In-Licensing Candidates: Domestic Company Appetite Map
  • Table 44. Stakeholder Position Map: Sponsors, Diagnostics, and Payers
  • Table 45. Real-World KRAS Testing Rates and Data Sources in Japan
  • Table 46. Pancreatic Cancer KRAS Program Detail: Line-of-Therapy Strategies
  • Table 47. Colorectal Cancer KRAS Program Detail: Combination Requirements
  • Table 48. NSCLC KRAS Program Detail: Post-Immunotherapy Positioning
  • Table 49. Horizon Scan: Molecular Glue and Next-Generation RAS Targeting
  • Table 50. Analytical Appendix: Trial Registries and Licensing Databases

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. KRAS Switch-Region Biology and Inhibitor Binding Model
  • Figure 2. Allele Distribution Map Across Japanese Tumor Types
  • Figure 3. KRAS Testing Infrastructure Diagram
  • Figure 4. Companion-Diagnostic Attach Model Flow
  • Figure 5. Lumakras Japanese Position Timeline
  • Figure 6. CodeBreaK Program Family Tree
  • Figure 7. Lumakras Combination Strategy Diagram
  • Figure 8. Adagrasib KRYSTAL Program Map
  • Figure 9. Adagrasib Japan Absence: Explanation Framework
  • Figure 10. Revolution Medicines RAS(ON) Mechanism Diagram
  • Figure 11. Daraxonrasib Pancreatic Program Map
  • Figure 12. RASolute 302 Pivotal Design Schematic
  • Figure 13. Allele-Selective RAS(ON) Program Tree
  • Figure 14. Olomorasib and Divarasib Program Schematics
  • Figure 15. Frontier, Erasca, and Verastem Program Map
  • Figure 16. China KRAS Developer Landscape
  • Figure 17. Jacobio and GenFleet Licensing Structure Diagrams
  • Figure 18. Resistance Mechanism Map to G12C Inhibition
  • Figure 19. Combination Architecture Framework
  • Figure 20. G12D and Pan-KRAS Program Map
  • Figure 21. Downstream Pathway Targeting Diagram
  • Figure 22. Guideline Positioning of KRAS Therapy in Japan
  • Figure 23. PMDA and Unapproved-Drug List Pathway
  • Figure 24. Sponsor-Recruitment Dynamics Diagram
  • Figure 25. Enrollment Competition Map in Asia
  • Figure 26. Allele-Defined Population Funnel
  • Figure 27. Testing Turnaround and Referral Flow
  • Figure 28. Pricing Precedent Map for Targeted Agents
  • Figure 29. Competitive Positioning Map: KRAS Assets
  • Figure 30. KRAS Licensing Deal Benchmark Framework
  • Figure 31. Japan Entry Model Decision Tree
  • Figure 32. Scenario Tree: KRAS Coverage of Japan's Tumor Burden
  • Figure 33. Risk Map: Resistance, Toxicity, and Timing
  • Figure 34. KRAS Class Monitoring Dashboard
  • Figure 35. Licensing Due-Diligence Flow
  • Figure 36. Domestic In-Licensing Appetite Map
  • Figure 37. Stakeholder Position Map
  • Figure 38. Real-World KRAS Testing Data Framework
  • Figure 39. Pancreatic Line-of-Therapy Strategy Diagram
  • Figure 40. Colorectal Combination Requirement Map
  • Figure 41. NSCLC Post-Immunotherapy Positioning Diagram
  • Figure 42. Molecular Glue Horizon Scan
  • Figure 43. Patient Journey from Biopsy to KRAS-Directed Therapy
  • Figure 44. Biomarker-Lab Readiness Framework
  • Figure 45. Sponsor Trial-Network Footprints in Japan
  • Figure 46. Investor KPI Dashboard for the KRAS Theme
  • Figure 47. Competitive Response Options for Incumbent Sponsors
  • Figure 48. Deal History Timeline in the KRAS Class
  • Figure 49. Synthesis: What Determines KRAS Class Value in Japan
  • Figure 50. Report Roadmap: Chapter Linkages to Reader Decisions
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!