SEARCH
What are you looking for?
Need help finding what you are looking for? Contact Us
Compare

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117116

Cover Image

PUBLISHER: Mellalta Meets LLP | PRODUCT CODE: 2117116

Pancreatic Cancer: Early Detection and Treatment Gaps | Market Intelligence | US, EU5, Japan & China

PUBLISHED:
PAGES: 180 Pages
DELIVERY TIME: 7-10 business days
SELECT AN OPTION
PPT (Single User License)
USD 6900
PPT (2 - 3 User License)
USD 7500
PPT (Site License - Up to 10 Users)
USD 10500
PPT (Enterprise License)
USD 15500

Add to Cart

Pancreatic cancer is the report card Japan's cancer system would rather not publish. The annual case count and the annual death count sit almost on top of each other - a mortality-to-incidence relationship no other major cancer matches - because most patients arrive with disease already spread, and the treatments available change that arithmetic only marginally. Surgery remains the only curative route, yet the window in which surgery is possible closes before symptoms force a diagnosis in the great majority of cases. Every serious analysis of the disease converges on the same conclusion: the leverage is in finding it earlier, and in the KRAS biology that drives nearly all of it.

The tension is that both levers are immature in instructive ways. Early detection lacks a proven screening target population and a validated test: multi-cancer blood tests from GRAIL, Freenome, Exact Sciences, Delfi, and Immunovia carry pancreatic signal claims of varying maturity, Japan's own Craif pursues a urine miRNA approach, and none yet has a reimbursement route or a defined high-risk pathway to attach to. On treatment, gemcitabine-based backbones and FOLFIRINOX define a standard that has barely moved, while Revolution Medicines' daraxonrasib pivotal program tests whether RAS(ON) inhibition can finally crack the disease's core driver - with Lilly, Verastem, and radioligand interests arrayed behind. What Japan's payer will fund, and against what evidence, is undecided on both fronts.

This report maps pancreatic cancer in Japan across the full chain: epidemiology and risk factors, the diagnostic pathway and its delays, surgical and systemic standards, the KRAS-directed pipeline program by program, and the early-detection field test by test. It treats the high-risk surveillance question - new-onset diabetes, family history, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm follow-up - as a defined commercial and clinical segment, and examines where Japanese diagnostics capability could attach to global early-detection platforms.

The report serves diagnostics investors evaluating early-detection claims, biotech BD teams tracking KRAS and pancreatic pipelines, hospital planners, and payers preparing for either a screening test or a practice-changing therapy. It is organized so that each reader can locate the specific uncertainty - validation, regulation, reimbursement, or sequencing - that governs their decision.

Scope and Coverage: The report covers pancreatic cancer epidemiology, diagnostic pathways, surgical and systemic treatment standards, KRAS-directed and other pipeline therapies, and the early-detection test landscape as each applies to Japan. It profiles Revolution Medicines, Lilly, Novartis, Verastem, GRAIL, Freenome, Exact Sciences, Delfi, Immunovia, Craif, and Burning Rock.

Report Highlights:

  • Quantifies the framework of Japan's pancreatic mortality-incidence relationship and diagnostic-delay structure
  • Maps the treatment standard: surgery, FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, and maintenance options
  • Profiles the KRAS-directed pipeline led by daraxonrasib's pivotal program
  • Reviews multi-cancer and pancreatic-specific early-detection tests and their evidence maturity
  • Defines the high-risk surveillance segment: new-onset diabetes, IPMN, and family history
  • Analyzes reimbursement and regulatory pathways for both diagnostics and therapeutics
Product Code: JPH-036

Table of Content

1. Executive Summary

2. Pancreatic Cancer: Overview and Clinical Background

3. Epidemiology and Patient Population: US, EU5, Japan, and China

4. Current Treatment Landscape and Standard of Care

5. Pipeline and Development Activity

6. Regulatory Pathways: FDA, EMA, PMDA, and NMPA Considerations

7. Reimbursement and Pricing Analysis with a Focus on Japan's NHI System

8. Competitive Landscape and Key Companies

9. Unmet Needs and Commercial Opportunities in Japan

10. Appendix: Methodology and Sources

Companies Mentioned

  • Revolution Medicines (US) - daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) Phase 3 in pancreatic cancer
  • Eli Lilly (US) - KRAS and pancreatic cancer pipeline
  • Novartis (CH) - radioligand and targeted oncology portfolio relevant to pancreatic NETs
  • GRAIL (US) - Galleri multi-cancer early-detection test with pancreatic signal
  • Freenome (US) - blood-based multi-cancer early detection including pancreatic
  • Exact Sciences (US) - blood-based early-detection programs
  • Verastem (US) - avutometinib RAS/MAPK pathway program
  • Immunovia (SE) - IMMray PanCan-d pancreatic early-detection test
  • Delfi Diagnostics (US) - fragmentomics-based early detection
  • Craif (JP) - urine miRNA cancer detection including pancreatic
  • Burning Rock (CN) - multi-cancer early detection in China
Product Code: JPH-036

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Pancreatic Cancer Epidemiology in Japan: Registry Framework and Data Sources
  • Table 2. Mortality-to-Incidence Relationship: Structural Explanation Framework
  • Table 3. Risk Factor Map: Smoking, Diabetes, Chronic Pancreatitis, and Family History
  • Table 4. Diagnostic Pathway of Pancreatic Cancer in Japan: Referral and Delay Points
  • Table 5. Imaging Standards: CT, EUS, and MRI/MRCP Roles in Diagnosis
  • Table 6. CA19-9 and Established Biomarkers: Roles and Limitations
  • Table 7. Resectability Classification and Surgical Standards in Japan
  • Table 8. Pancreatic Surgery Center Concentration and Volume Standards
  • Table 9. Perioperative Regimens: Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Frameworks
  • Table 10. FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine-Nab-Paclitaxel: First-Line Standards
  • Table 11. NALIRIFOX and NAPOLI-3 Program Context
  • Table 12. Maintenance and Second-Line Treatment Framework
  • Table 13. BRCA and Homologous-Recombination Alterations: Olaparib POLO Context
  • Table 14. MSI and Rare-Alteration Subgroups in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Table 15. KRAS Biology in Pancreatic Cancer: Allele Distribution
  • Table 16. Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236): Mechanism and Early-Phase Pancreatic Data Framework
  • Table 17. RASolute 302: Pivotal Program Design and Japanese Site Participation
  • Table 18. Revolution Medicines Allele-Selective Programs Relevant to Pancreas
  • Table 19. Lilly KRAS and Pancreatic Pipeline Programs
  • Table 20. Verastem Avutometinib RAS/MAPK Pathway Program
  • Table 21. Novartis Radioligand Relevance to Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Table 22. Stroma-Targeting and Microenvironment Strategies: Program Landscape
  • Table 23. Immunotherapy Failure Modes in Pancreatic Cancer: Evidence Framework
  • Table 24. Early-Detection Concept Taxonomy: Single-Cancer vs Multi-Cancer Approaches
  • Table 25. GRAIL Galleri: Pancreatic Signal and Program Design
  • Table 26. Freenome Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Early-Detection Programs
  • Table 27. Exact Sciences Blood-Based Early-Detection Development
  • Table 28. Immunovia IMMray PanCan-d: Pancreatic-Specific Test Design
  • Table 29. Delfi Diagnostics Fragmentomics Platform
  • Table 30. Craif Urine miRNA Cancer Detection: Japanese Program Profile
  • Table 31. Burning Rock Multi-Cancer Early Detection: China Context
  • Table 32. Evidence Maturity Framework for Early-Detection Tests
  • Table 33. High-Risk Surveillance Segment: New-Onset Diabetes Enrichment Strategies
  • Table 34. IPMN and Cystic Lesion Follow-Up as a Surveillance Channel
  • Table 35. Familial and Genetic High-Risk Clinic Models
  • Table 36. Pancreatic NET Diagnostics and Treatment: Distinct Framework
  • Table 37. Regulatory Pathways for Early-Detection Tests in Japan
  • Table 38. Reimbursement Precedents for Cancer Screening Diagnostics Under NHI
  • Table 39. Pricing and Access Framework for Pancreatic Therapeutics
  • Table 40. Competitive Positioning Matrix: Pancreatic Pipeline Assets
  • Table 41. Deal Benchmarks for Pancreatic Oncology and Detection Licensing
  • Table 42. Trial-Enrollment Dynamics in Japanese Pancreatic Studies
  • Table 43. Scenario Framework: Early Detection Adoption vs Therapeutic Breakthrough Paths
  • Table 44. Risk Register: Validation Failure, Overdiagnosis, and Sequencing Disputes
  • Table 45. Indicator Dashboard for Pancreatic Theme Monitoring
  • Table 46. Due-Diligence Checklist for Early-Detection Investments
  • Table 47. Stakeholder Position Map: Societies, Payers, Developers, and Registries
  • Table 48. Real-World Data Sources for Pancreatic Cancer in Japan
  • Table 49. Patient Journey from Symptom Onset to Treatment Decision
  • Table 50. Analytical Appendix: Registries, Trial Sources, and Test-Validation Literature

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Pancreatic Cancer Epidemiological Framework
  • Figure 2. Mortality-Incidence Structure Diagram
  • Figure 3. Risk Factor Map
  • Figure 4. Diagnostic Pathway and Delay Point Diagram
  • Figure 5. Imaging Standard Roles in Diagnosis
  • Figure 6. Biomarker Role and Limitation Framework
  • Figure 7. Resectability Classification Diagram
  • Figure 8. Surgical Center Concentration Map Framework
  • Figure 9. Perioperative Regimen Timeline
  • Figure 10. First-Line Standard Comparison Framework
  • Figure 11. NAPOLI-3 Program Schematic
  • Figure 12. Maintenance and Second-Line Framework
  • Figure 13. POLO and Homologous-Recombination Context
  • Figure 14. Rare-Alteration Subgroup Map
  • Figure 15. KRAS Allele Distribution in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Figure 16. Daraxonrasib Mechanism Diagram
  • Figure 17. RASolute 302 Design Schematic
  • Figure 18. Revolution Medicines Allele-Selective Program Map
  • Figure 19. Lilly and Verastem Pancreatic Programs
  • Figure 20. NET Radioligand Context Diagram
  • Figure 21. Stroma-Targeting Strategy Landscape
  • Figure 22. Immunotherapy Failure Mode Framework
  • Figure 23. Early-Detection Concept Taxonomy
  • Figure 24. GRAIL Galleri Program Structure
  • Figure 25. Freenome and Exact Sciences Program Maps
  • Figure 26. IMMray PanCan-d Test Design Diagram
  • Figure 27. Delfi Fragmentomics Platform Schematic
  • Figure 28. Craif Urine miRNA Program Diagram
  • Figure 29. Burning Rock China Context Map
  • Figure 30. Evidence Maturity Framework for Early Detection
  • Figure 31. New-Onset Diabetes Enrichment Strategy Diagram
  • Figure 32. IPMN Surveillance Channel Flow
  • Figure 33. Familial High-Risk Clinic Model
  • Figure 34. Pancreatic NET Distinct Framework Map
  • Figure 35. Regulatory Pathway Map for Early-Detection Tests
  • Figure 36. NHI Screening Reimbursement Precedent Map
  • Figure 37. Pancreatic Therapeutic Pricing Framework
  • Figure 38. Competitive Positioning Map: Pipeline Assets
  • Figure 39. Licensing Deal Benchmark Framework
  • Figure 40. Enrollment Dynamics in Japanese Pancreatic Studies
  • Figure 41. Scenario Tree: Detection Adoption vs Therapeutic Breakthrough
  • Figure 42. Risk Map: Validation, Overdiagnosis, and Sequencing
  • Figure 43. Pancreatic Theme Monitoring Dashboard
  • Figure 44. Early-Detection Investment Due-Diligence Flow
  • Figure 45. Stakeholder Position Map
  • Figure 46. Real-World Data Source Map
  • Figure 47. Patient Journey Diagram from Symptoms to Treatment
  • Figure 48. Investor KPI Dashboard for the Pancreatic Theme
  • Figure 49. Synthesis: Where Pancreatic Leverage Actually Sits in Japan
  • Figure 50. Report Roadmap: Chapter Linkages to Reader Decisions
Have a question?
Picture

Jeroen Van Heghe

Manager - EMEA

+32-2-535-7543

Picture

Christine Sirois

Manager - Americas

+1-860-674-8796

Questions? Please give us a call or visit the contact form.
Hi, how can we help?
Contact us!