The Bike and Scootersharing Telematics Market - 3rd Edition

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

List of Figures

Executive Summary

1. Introduction to Micromobility

• 1.1. Introduction
  • 1.1.1. Passenger cars in use by region
  • 1.1.2. The new passenger car registration trends
  • 1.1.3. Bicycle and scooter usage
  • 1.1.4. Shared mobility services
• 1.2. Market trends
  • 1.2.1. Peak car use and car ownership
  • 1.2.2. The sharing economy
• 1.3. Overview of micromobility services
  • 1.3.1. Bikesharing services
  • 1.3.2. Scootersharing services
  • 1.3.3. Operational models
• 1.4. Micromobility services worldwide
  • 1.4.1. Micromobility in Europe
  • 1.4.2. Micromobility in North America
  • 1.4.3. Micromobility in Asia-Pacific
  • 1.4.4. Overview of micromobility service providers
  • 1.4.5. Business models
• 1.5. Micromobility telematics infrastructure
  • 1.5.1. Vehicle Segment
  • 1.5.2. Tracking segment
  • 1.5.3. Network segment
  • 1.5.4. Service segment

2. Market Forecasts and Trends

• 2.1. Bikesharing market forecasts
  • 2.1.1. Bikesharing in Europe
  • 2.1.2. Bikesharing in North America
  • 2.1.3. Bikesharing in Rest of World
  • 2.1.4. Bikesharing technology vendor market shares
• 2.2. Scootersharing market forecasts
  • 2.2.1. Scootersharing in Europe
  • 2.2.2. Scootersharing in North America
  • 2.2.3. Scootersharing in Rest of World
  • 2.2.4. Scootersharing service providers
• 2.3. Regulatory environment
• 2.4. Market trends and industry observations
  • 2.4.1. Micromobility is becoming increasingly integrated with other mobility services
  • 2.4.2. Micromobility and public transport ecosystems to converge
  • 2.4.3. Cities will embrace various types of micromobility
  • 2.4.4. Micromobility operators now use more ruggedized vehicles
  • 2.4.5. Scooters are equipped with factory-installed telematics systems as standard
  • 2.4.6. Telecoms industry players bet on micromobility services
  • 2.4.7. The micromobility market has entered a consolidation phase
  • 2.4.8. Micromobility operators adopt advanced telematics technology
  • 2.4.9. The relationship between cities and mobility operators has changed drastically
  • 2.4.10. Vehicle utilisation has become the most important KPI

3. Micromobility Operators

• 3.1. Specialist micromobility operators
  • 3.1.1. Beam Mobility
  • 3.1.2. Blinkee.city
  • 3.1.3. Bolt
  • 3.1.4. Dott
  • 3.1.5. Helbiz (Micromobility.com)
  • 3.1.6. Lime
  • 3.1.7. Lyft
  • 3.1.8. Marti Technologies
  • 3.1.9. Neuron Mobility
  • 3.1.10. RideMovi
  • 3.1.11. Swing Mobility
  • 3.1.12. Tier Mobility
  • 3.1.13. Yulu
• 3.2. Specialist bikesharing operators
  • 3.2.1. Anywheel
  • 3.2.2. Bixi Montreal
  • 3.2.3. Blue-bike
  • 3.2.4. Call a Bike by DB Connect
  • 3.2.5. DiDi (Qingju)
  • 3.2.6. Docomo Cycle
  • 3.2.7. Donkey Republic
  • 3.2.8. Forest
  • 3.2.9. Freebike
  • 3.2.10. Hello Cycling
  • 3.2.11. Hellobike
  • 3.2.12. JCDecaux (Cyclocity)
  • 3.2.13. Meituan Bike
  • 3.2.14. Mevo (Rower Metropolitalny)
  • 3.2.15. MYBYK
  • 3.2.16. Nextbike (Tier Mobility)
  • 3.2.17. SG Bike
  • 3.2.18. Tembici
• 3.3. Specialist stand-up scootersharing operators
  • 3.3.1. Bird
  • 3.3.2. BinBin
  • 3.3.3. Hop
  • 3.3.4. Poppy
  • 3.3.5. Ryde Technology
  • 3.3.6. Spin (Bird)
  • 3.3.7. Superpedestrian
  • 3.3.8. Urent
  • 3.3.9. Voi Technology
  • 3.3.10. Whoosh
• 3.4. Specialist sit-down scootersharing operators
  • 3.4.1. Acciona
  • 3.4.2. Cityscoot
  • 3.4.3. Cooltra
  • 3.4.4. Emmy (GoTo Global)
  • 3.4.5. Felyx
  • 3.4.6. GoShare
  • 3.4.7. Revel
  • 3.4.8. Vogo (Chalo Mobility Services)
  • 3.4.9. WeMo

4. Technology Vendors

• 4.1. Specialist bikesharing technology vendors
  • 4.1.1. Conneqtech
  • 4.1.2. DropBike (Drop Mobility)
  • 4.1.3. Fifteen
  • 4.1.4. Haveltec
  • 4.1.5. PBSC Urban Solutions (Lyft)
  • 4.1.6. Vaimoo
  • 4.1.7. Youon Bike Technologies
• 4.2. Micromobility telematics solution vendors
  • 4.2.1. Comodule
  • 4.2.2. Drover AI
  • 4.2.3. Invers
  • 4.2.4. Luna Systems
  • 4.2.5. OCTO Telematics
  • 4.2.6. Omni Intelligent Technology
  • 4.2.7. Queclink Wireless Solutions
  • 4.2.8. Teltonika
  • 4.2.9. Tracefy
  • 4.2.10. Vulog
• 4.3. Micromobility software platform vendors
  • 4.3.1. Atom Mobility
  • 4.3.2. ElectricFeel
  • 4.3.3. Good Travel Software
  • 4.3.4. Joyride Technologies
  • 4.3.5. Moqo
  • 4.3.6. ScootAPI
  • 4.3.7. Urban Sharing
  • 4.3.8. Wunder Mobility
  • 4.3.9. Zemtu
  • 4.3.10. Zoba
• List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

List of Figures

• Figure 1.1: Car parc by region (World 2015-2021)
• Figure 1.2: Passenger car density per 1,000 inhabitants (EU+EFTA+UK 2021)
• Figure 1.3: New car registration data (World 2015-2022)
• Figure 1.4: Top 10 countries by new passenger car and light truck registrations (2022)
• Figure 1.5: Bike market data (Europe 2022)
• Figure 1.6: Bike market data (North America 2022)
• Figure 1.7: Top 15 countries by new motorcycle and moped registrations (2022)
• Figure 1.8: Example of bicycle design used in bikesharing schemes
• Figure 1.9: Examples of vehicles used in scootersharing services
• Figure 1.10: Bike and scootersharing fleet and availability (World 2018-2022)
• Figure 1.11: Micromobility service providers by industry background (Q4-2023)
• Figure 1.12: Micromobility telematics system overview
• Figure 1.13: Smartphone QR reader access solution
• Figure 2.1: Shared micromobility fleet by service (World 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.2: Bikesharing fleet by operational model (World 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.3: Bikesharing stations by region (World 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.4: Bikesharing fleet and stations (Europe 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.5: Bikesharing fleet and stations (North America 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.6: Bikesharing fleet and stations (ROW 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.7: Leading bikesharing technology vendors (World Q4-2022)
• Figure 2.8: Scootersharing fleet by vehicle type (World 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.9: Scootersharing fleet by vehicle type (Europe 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.10: Scootersharing fleet by vehicle type (North America 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.11: Scootersharing fleet by vehicle type (ROW 2022-2027)
• Figure 2.12: Leading stand-up scootersharing providers (World Q4-2022)
• Figure 2.13: Leading sit-down scootersharing providers (World Q4-2022)
• Figure 2.14: Examples of scooter manufacturers (Q4-2023)
• Figure 2.15: Mergers and acquisitions in the micromobility ecosystem (2018-2023)
• Figure 3.1: Specialist micromobility service providers (World Q4-2023)
• Figure 3.2: The Yulu Miracle low speed electric vehicle
• Figure 3.3: Specialist bikesharing service providers (World Q4-2023)
• Figure 3.4: The Docomo Cycle bike and smartphone app
• Figure 3.5: Examples of stand-up scootersharing operators (World Q4-2023)
• Figure 3.6: Examples of sit-down scootersharing operators (World Q4-2023)
• Figure 4.1: Micromobility technology vendors (Q4-2023)
• Figure 4.2: Overview of specialist bikesharing technology vendors (Q4-2023)
• Figure 4.3: Bikesharing station from PBSC Urban Solutions
• Figure 4.4: Overview of micromobility telematics system vendors (Q4-2023)
• Figure 4.5: The CloudBoxx Mini
• Figure 4.6: Overview of micromobility platform vendors (Q4-2023)